Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		23	0.34	49	0.00	12	0.12	10	0.49	23	0.45	13	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		62	0.23	57	0.00	35	0.05	35	0.21	24	0.45	28	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		71	0.21	63	0.00	76	0.04	72	0.04	79	0.04	77	0.04
Bacha 2000		50	0.26	54	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.09	33	0.25	40	0.15
Badura 1965		45	0.27	61	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.12	29	0.39	35	0.22
Barbosa 1983		14	0.36	6	0.05	13	0.11	14	0.44	23	0.43	15	0.43
Biret 1990		69	0.22	64	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	33	0.40	41	0.15
Blet 2003		55	0.25	37	0.00	57	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.08	51	0.07
Block 1995		38	0.29	85	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.04	76	0.04
Blumental 1952		74	0.18	53	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	79	0.03	88	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		5	0.44	1	0.19	1	0.19	4	0.66	11	0.61	2	0.63
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.35	15	0.01	16	0.10	13	0.44	9	0.61	9	0.52
Bunin 1987		70	0.21	86	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.04
Bunin 1987b		68	0.22	65	0.00	73	0.04	77	0.04	61	0.05	69	0.04
Chiu 1999		15	0.36	4	0.08	10	0.09	17	0.40	53	0.07	38	0.17
Cohen 1997		37	0.30	9	0.02	18	0.10	25	0.33	22	0.49	21	0.40
Cortot 1951		17	0.35	16	0.01	17	0.10	11	0.48	13	0.59	8	0.53
Csalog 1996		72	0.19	50	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	74	0.04	74	0.04
Czerny 1949		78	0.17	10	0.02	47	0.06	47	0.06	28	0.56	37	0.18
Czerny 1990		44	0.27	29	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	45	0.09	52	0.07
Duchoud 2007		25	0.34	14	0.01	31	0.08	32	0.26	43	0.15	36	0.20
Ezaki 2006		26	0.33	12	0.02	7	0.13	8	0.53	17	0.62	5	0.57
Falvay 1989		41	0.28	58	0.00	45	0.05	62	0.05	39	0.16	48	0.09
Farrell 1958		20	0.34	28	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.34	11	0.52	16	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.24	34	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	23	0.70	29	0.30
Fliere 1977		8	0.40	35	0.00	9	0.12	9	0.52	42	0.32	20	0.41
Fou 1978		12	0.37	26	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.48	21	0.42	14	0.45
Francois 1956		65	0.22	67	0.00	46	0.05	61	0.05	29	0.41	42	0.14
Friedman 1923		18	0.35	19	0.01	15	0.11	22	0.35	43	0.20	34	0.26
Friedman 1923b		19	0.35	7	0.03	14	0.10	21	0.35	42	0.24	32	0.29
Friedman 1930		51	0.26	62	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	52	0.07	56	0.06
Garcia 2007		2	0.46	5	0.08	5	0.19	3	0.66	8	0.65	1	0.65
Garcia 2007b		85	0.08	87	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		61	0.23	66	0.00	54	0.05	66	0.05	38	0.21	47	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		53	0.26	77	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.18	25	0.47	33	0.29
Groot 1988		67	0.22	80	0.00	62	0.05	67	0.05	67	0.05	62	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.40	11	0.02	8	0.13	7	0.54	19	0.45	11	0.49
Hatto 1993		75	0.18	78	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	68	0.05	85	0.03
Hatto 1997		80	0.15	32	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03
Horowitz 1949		30	0.32	51	0.00	51	0.05	68	0.05	55	0.06	60	0.05
Indjic 1988		84	0.14	68	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	71	0.05	73	0.04
Kapell 1951		10	0.40	21	0.00	20	0.10	15	0.43	34	0.20	31	0.29
Kissin 1993		73	0.18	81	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	67	0.05	82	0.03
Kushner 1989		39	0.28	33	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	71	0.04	50	0.07
Luisada 1991		56	0.25	25	0.00	70	0.06	50	0.06	68	0.05	57	0.05
Lushtak 2004		21	0.34	22	0.00	23	0.08	20	0.38	13	0.46	18	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		66	0.22	44	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	78	0.03	81	0.03
Magaloff 1978		49	0.27	79	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	45	0.07	53	0.06
Magin 1975		87	0.00	82	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Michalowski 1933		81	0.14	59	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.05	72	0.04
Milkina 1970		54	0.25	38	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.27	24	0.43	25	0.34
Mohovich 1999		6	0.41	23	0.00	6	0.13	6	0.58	13	0.56	6	0.57
Moravec 1969		36	0.30	40	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	68	0.04	64	0.04
Morozova 2008		33	0.31	69	0.00	28	0.06	31	0.27	76	0.04	45	0.10
Neighaus 1950		3	0.45	3	0.17	3	0.29	1	0.68	13	0.49	4	0.58
Niedzielski 1931		42	0.28	46	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.05	68	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		57	0.25	72	0.00	65	0.05	57	0.05	77	0.04	71	0.04
Osinska 1989		28	0.32	30	0.00	33	0.08	27	0.31	29	0.44	22	0.37
Pachmann 1927		34	0.30	74	0.00	52	0.05	63	0.05	50	0.07	55	0.06
Paderewski 1930		59	0.24	88	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.05	70	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.23	70	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.04	65	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.26	42	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	63	0.04	66	0.04
Poblocka 1999		22	0.34	27	0.00	24	0.06	23	0.34	30	0.31	26	0.32
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.31	24	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.39	20	0.64	10	0.50
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.28	73	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	50	0.05	58	0.05
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		40	0.28	43	0.00	67	0.07	45	0.07	62	0.05	54	0.06
Rosen 1989		1	0.47	2	0.17	2	0.23	2	0.67	14	0.58	3	0.62
Rosenthal 1930		29	0.32	52	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.19	17	0.48	30	0.30
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.22	39	0.00	27	0.07	34	0.22	24	0.56	24	0.35
Rosenthal 1931b		35	0.30	41	0.00	26	0.08	29	0.29	18	0.62	19	0.42
Rosenthal 1931c		27	0.33	18	0.01	19	0.14	16	0.42	13	0.58	12	0.49
Rosenthal 1931d		48	0.27	13	0.02	37	0.05	36	0.19	15	0.53	27	0.32
Rossi 2007		88	-0.06	89	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.05	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.17	83	0.00	69	0.05	64	0.05	72	0.04	67	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		79	0.17	90	0.00	66	0.06	46	0.06	57	0.05	63	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.44	8	0.03	4	0.18	5	0.62	6	0.51	7	0.56
Schilhawsky 1960		82	0.14	36	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	53	0.05	75	0.04
Shebanova 2002		13	0.37	31	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.31	51	0.08	39	0.16
Smith 1975		76	0.17	75	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	35	0.24	44	0.11
Sokolov 2002		83	0.14	20	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.03	79	0.03
Sztompka 1959		47	0.27	47	0.00	64	0.05	65	0.05	66	0.05	61	0.05
Tomsic 1995		58	0.24	45	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.06	59	0.05
Uninsky 1932		24	0.34	60	0.00	32	0.09	38	0.19	64	0.05	46	0.10
Uninsky 1971		46	0.27	71	0.00	39	0.07	33	0.24	52	0.07	43	0.13
Wasowski 1980		31	0.31	55	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	52	0.06	49	0.08
Zak 1937		9	0.40	17	0.01	21	0.10	19	0.38	19	0.47	17	0.42
Zak 1951		11	0.37	48	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.29	20	0.47	23	0.37
Random 1		90	-0.13	56	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		86	0.00	76	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.06	84	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.08	84	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	76	0.02	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).