Barbosa 1983

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		19	0.39	12	0.02	19	0.07	21	0.43	28	0.37	20	0.40
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.34	72	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.37	13	0.53	17	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.38	60	0.00	23	0.08	20	0.44	63	0.06	32	0.16
Bacha 2000		48	0.29	61	0.00	52	0.05	59	0.05	30	0.28	36	0.12
Badura 1965		77	0.17	53	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	63	0.04	85	0.03
Barbosa 1983		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Biret 1990		59	0.25	73	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	39	0.27	38	0.12
Blet 2003		11	0.42	49	0.00	11	0.14	6	0.67	10	0.65	3	0.66
Block 1995		46	0.30	8	0.03	25	0.09	29	0.35	38	0.18	28	0.25
Blumental 1952		31	0.34	45	0.00	46	0.05	63	0.05	42	0.13	54	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.42	15	0.02	7	0.16	5	0.67	13	0.57	6	0.62
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.19	66	0.00	79	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.05	72	0.04
Bunin 1987		34	0.33	10	0.03	30	0.09	26	0.37	27	0.43	21	0.40
Bunin 1987b		35	0.33	23	0.01	31	0.09	28	0.36	24	0.41	22	0.38
Chiu 1999		5	0.44	32	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.50	44	0.15	26	0.27
Cohen 1997		61	0.25	31	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.06	68	0.05
Cortot 1951		81	0.15	47	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	80	0.02	87	0.03
Csalog 1996		75	0.19	84	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		88	0.04	74	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.04	84	0.03
Czerny 1990		40	0.32	38	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.21	46	0.10
Duchoud 2007		53	0.27	42	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	62	0.05	66	0.05
Ezaki 2006		57	0.26	59	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	49	0.07	57	0.05
Falvay 1989		64	0.24	75	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.13	51	0.06	47	0.09
Farrell 1958		62	0.25	54	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.13	47	0.07	43	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		83	0.15	78	0.00	77	0.04	74	0.04	39	0.33	42	0.11
Fliere 1977		33	0.33	50	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	73	0.04	55	0.06
Fou 1978		45	0.31	67	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.13	48	0.05	52	0.08
Francois 1956		66	0.23	37	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	43	0.16	51	0.09
Friedman 1923		52	0.28	68	0.00	64	0.06	52	0.06	57	0.07	56	0.06
Friedman 1923b		55	0.27	87	0.00	63	0.05	65	0.05	64	0.06	69	0.05
Friedman 1930		38	0.32	81	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	56	0.06	49	0.09
Garcia 2007		16	0.41	3	0.11	4	0.14	9	0.63	10	0.61	5	0.62
Garcia 2007b		27	0.35	63	0.00	24	0.09	19	0.47	15	0.59	14	0.53
Gierzod 1998		72	0.20	88	0.00	69	0.05	56	0.05	54	0.06	65	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		73	0.20	85	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.05	78	0.04
Groot 1988		29	0.34	22	0.01	26	0.08	18	0.49	66	0.05	33	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		10	0.42	11	0.02	12	0.09	24	0.40	40	0.15	30	0.24
Hatto 1993		4	0.44	7	0.05	3	0.13	3	0.72	15	0.53	7	0.62
Hatto 1997		17	0.40	36	0.00	9	0.12	10	0.63	10	0.53	12	0.58
Horowitz 1949		21	0.38	28	0.01	18	0.08	11	0.59	18	0.57	11	0.58
Indjic 1988		3	0.47	1	0.14	1	0.14	2	0.73	11	0.63	2	0.68
Kapell 1951		8	0.43	16	0.01	8	0.19	8	0.64	11	0.49	13	0.56
Kissin 1993		44	0.31	56	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.21	43	0.28	29	0.24
Kushner 1989		42	0.31	82	0.00	56	0.06	50	0.06	57	0.05	60	0.05
Luisada 1991		2	0.48	2	0.12	2	0.14	1	0.74	9	0.70	1	0.72
Lushtak 2004		7	0.43	5	0.07	14	0.09	31	0.32	18	0.39	23	0.35
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.35	30	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.19	55	0.05	44	0.10
Magaloff 1978		71	0.21	58	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	71	0.04	74	0.04
Magin 1975		51	0.28	79	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	44	0.16	39	0.11
Michalowski 1933		58	0.25	57	0.00	45	0.05	55	0.05	57	0.06	63	0.05
Milkina 1970		49	0.28	29	0.00	55	0.07	45	0.07	35	0.29	35	0.14
Mohovich 1999		13	0.42	6	0.07	6	0.17	15	0.52	17	0.49	15	0.50
Moravec 1969		67	0.21	46	0.00	72	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.04	79	0.03
Morozova 2008		6	0.43	20	0.01	20	0.07	30	0.32	44	0.09	31	0.17
Neighaus 1950		22	0.38	18	0.01	15	0.08	14	0.54	42	0.13	27	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		23	0.37	48	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.27	51	0.07	34	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.32	64	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.26	50	0.05	41	0.11
Osinska 1989		80	0.16	83	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04
Pachmann 1927		56	0.26	44	0.00	51	0.05	66	0.05	62	0.06	62	0.05
Paderewski 1930		41	0.31	51	0.00	29	0.11	32	0.32	38	0.28	25	0.30
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.31	35	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	53	0.05	58	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.16	89	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.03	81	0.03
Poblocka 1999		28	0.34	33	0.00	27	0.10	22	0.43	20	0.42	19	0.42
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.23	69	0.00	66	0.06	51	0.06	39	0.21	40	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		47	0.30	41	0.00	60	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.04	59	0.05
Rangell 2001		24	0.36	24	0.01	17	0.09	23	0.43	14	0.44	18	0.43
Richter 1976		30	0.34	40	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	47	0.09	48	0.09
Rosen 1989		60	0.25	86	0.00	57	0.07	47	0.07	72	0.03	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.21	39	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	63	0.05	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.16	65	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	58	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.15	80	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.12	70	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.13	71	0.00	81	0.04	73	0.04	63	0.03	86	0.03
Rossi 2007		89	-0.07	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	67	0.04	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		50	0.28	76	0.00	68	0.05	68	0.05	70	0.04	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.24	21	0.01	53	0.06	49	0.06	67	0.04	70	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.50	4	0.09	5	0.18	4	0.68	4	0.58	4	0.63
Schilhawsky 1960		12	0.42	27	0.01	22	0.10	13	0.56	4	0.67	9	0.61
Shebanova 2002		14	0.41	17	0.01	10	0.14	7	0.66	40	0.35	16	0.48
Smith 1975		69	0.21	77	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	65	0.05	75	0.04
Sokolov 2002		74	0.20	52	0.00	58	0.05	60	0.05	68	0.03	73	0.04
Sztompka 1959		54	0.27	14	0.02	35	0.08	38	0.17	54	0.06	45	0.10
Tomsic 1995		70	0.21	19	0.01	50	0.05	67	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.05
Uninsky 1932		26	0.35	43	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.21	51	0.07	37	0.12
Uninsky 1971		39	0.32	25	0.01	47	0.05	62	0.05	56	0.06	64	0.05
Wasowski 1980		36	0.32	13	0.02	32	0.13	25	0.39	38	0.26	24	0.32
Zak 1937		15	0.41	9	0.03	13	0.09	12	0.58	11	0.65	8	0.61
Zak 1951		18	0.40	26	0.01	16	0.09	16	0.52	8	0.65	10	0.58
Random 1		87	0.06	62	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	10	0.42	50	0.09
Random 2		86	0.10	34	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	24	0.31	53	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.09	55	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	47	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).