Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		76	0.19	80	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	83	0.03	80	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		69	0.22	68	0.00	69	0.04	79	0.04	63	0.04	72	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.59	7	0.01	5	0.21	3	0.83	9	0.80	8	0.81
Bacha 2000		72	0.21	66	0.00	66	0.06	58	0.06	67	0.04	59	0.05
Badura 1965		63	0.26	81	0.00	55	0.04	78	0.04	50	0.05	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		48	0.34	48	0.00	46	0.09	47	0.09	44	0.10	50	0.09
Biret 1990		78	0.14	32	0.00	79	0.04	80	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.04
Blet 2003		39	0.40	53	0.00	44	0.16	43	0.30	38	0.33	43	0.31
Block 1995		19	0.54	40	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.72	10	0.65	23	0.68
Blumental 1952		58	0.28	69	0.00	57	0.05	66	0.05	60	0.05	65	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		25	0.49	41	0.00	27	0.15	23	0.71	10	0.63	25	0.67
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.17	42	0.00	74	0.07	52	0.07	65	0.05	53	0.06
Bunin 1987		52	0.33	59	0.00	34	0.11	38	0.40	25	0.43	38	0.41
Bunin 1987b		54	0.33	72	0.00	37	0.10	39	0.39	23	0.41	40	0.40
Chiu 1999		3	0.62	19	0.00	12	0.17	6	0.82	3	0.76	9	0.79
Cohen 1997		65	0.25	49	0.00	77	0.04	77	0.04	80	0.02	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		64	0.25	82	0.00	73	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.05
Csalog 1996		35	0.45	45	0.00	38	0.12	37	0.43	12	0.57	34	0.50
Czerny 1949		85	0.01	83	0.00	87	0.02	89	0.02	84	0.02	84	0.02
Czerny 1990		17	0.55	8	0.01	6	0.23	5	0.82	4	0.86	3	0.84
Duchoud 2007		33	0.47	25	0.00	25	0.12	22	0.71	4	0.70	20	0.70
Ezaki 2006		79	0.14	84	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	85	0.02	76	0.03
Falvay 1989		67	0.22	38	0.00	63	0.06	57	0.06	69	0.03	70	0.04
Farrell 1958		70	0.22	50	0.00	68	0.05	64	0.05	45	0.08	54	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		90	-0.12	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Fliere 1977		1	0.71	1	0.44	1	0.44	2	0.89	1	0.86	1	0.87
Fou 1978		31	0.47	18	0.00	33	0.11	31	0.58	11	0.55	33	0.56
Francois 1956		81	0.11	51	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923		10	0.58	15	0.01	9	0.13	10	0.80	4	0.79	12	0.79
Friedman 1923b		11	0.58	27	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.79	5	0.80	11	0.79
Friedman 1930		4	0.61	3	0.05	3	0.24	7	0.81	3	0.83	5	0.82
Garcia 2007		36	0.45	85	0.00	22	0.12	26	0.66	2	0.69	24	0.67
Garcia 2007b		47	0.34	9	0.01	42	0.12	42	0.32	23	0.52	39	0.41
Gierzod 1998		75	0.19	57	0.00	64	0.06	56	0.06	64	0.05	63	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.28	28	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	65	0.04	74	0.04
Groot 1988		20	0.52	20	0.00	24	0.12	24	0.69	13	0.53	29	0.60
Harasiewicz 1955		32	0.47	33	0.00	43	0.13	44	0.28	46	0.07	45	0.14
Hatto 1993		13	0.56	54	0.00	16	0.18	14	0.78	7	0.70	16	0.74
Hatto 1997		56	0.30	86	0.00	59	0.05	67	0.05	56	0.05	62	0.05
Horowitz 1949		26	0.48	46	0.00	26	0.14	27	0.66	9	0.72	21	0.69
Indjic 1988		23	0.50	74	0.00	23	0.11	19	0.75	14	0.63	22	0.69
Kapell 1951		30	0.47	31	0.00	29	0.12	35	0.51	16	0.45	36	0.48
Kissin 1993		22	0.50	14	0.01	20	0.16	17	0.76	7	0.78	13	0.77
Kushner 1989		7	0.59	13	0.01	13	0.23	9	0.80	3	0.79	10	0.79
Luisada 1991		38	0.41	11	0.01	41	0.11	40	0.39	35	0.28	42	0.33
Lushtak 2004		53	0.33	70	0.00	58	0.05	68	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		34	0.46	75	0.00	32	0.13	30	0.61	14	0.58	30	0.59
Magaloff 1978		18	0.54	47	0.00	17	0.14	18	0.75	9	0.72	18	0.73
Magin 1975		12	0.56	5	0.03	8	0.13	12	0.79	3	0.86	4	0.82
Michalowski 1933		37	0.45	10	0.01	39	0.12	34	0.52	19	0.47	35	0.49
Milkina 1970		82	0.08	29	0.00	75	0.04	74	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04
Mohovich 1999		51	0.33	39	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	54	0.06	66	0.05
Moravec 1969		44	0.35	87	0.00	48	0.07	50	0.07	46	0.05	52	0.06
Morozova 2008		27	0.48	22	0.00	18	0.13	25	0.68	7	0.62	27	0.65
Neighaus 1950		41	0.38	34	0.00	45	0.10	45	0.10	57	0.05	51	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		8	0.59	4	0.05	4	0.27	4	0.83	2	0.79	6	0.81
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.55	17	0.00	15	0.17	20	0.73	2	0.69	19	0.71
Osinska 1989		45	0.34	23	0.00	54	0.05	63	0.05	52	0.06	60	0.05
Pachmann 1927		5	0.60	16	0.00	7	0.13	8	0.80	5	0.83	7	0.81
Paderewski 1930		28	0.48	36	0.00	31	0.12	28	0.65	10	0.65	26	0.65
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.48	52	0.00	30	0.11	32	0.55	16	0.62	31	0.58
Pierdomenico 2008		24	0.49	30	0.00	36	0.13	33	0.53	7	0.63	32	0.58
Poblocka 1999		40	0.40	26	0.00	35	0.10	36	0.48	14	0.45	37	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		80	0.13	56	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.02	83	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.37	55	0.00	40	0.10	41	0.36	26	0.41	41	0.38
Rangell 2001		59	0.28	21	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	45	0.07	58	0.06
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		21	0.52	24	0.00	28	0.14	29	0.64	13	0.60	28	0.62
Rosenthal 1930		66	0.23	88	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	76	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.08	60	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.06	63	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	79	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.22	61	0.00	72	0.06	55	0.06	61	0.04	68	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.00	71	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		71	0.21	89	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	19	0.39	46	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		62	0.26	67	0.00	49	0.07	51	0.07	37	0.13	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.34	43	0.00	53	0.08	49	0.08	40	0.13	48	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.36	44	0.00	50	0.08	48	0.08	53	0.05	56	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.26	62	0.00	51	0.07	53	0.07	31	0.30	44	0.14
Shebanova 2002		2	0.68	2	0.28	2	0.50	1	0.89	4	0.85	2	0.87
Smith 1975		74	0.20	64	0.00	81	0.04	76	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Sokolov 2002		57	0.28	35	0.00	61	0.05	65	0.05	70	0.03	69	0.04
Sztompka 1959		9	0.58	12	0.01	14	0.22	15	0.77	7	0.75	14	0.76
Tomsic 1995		50	0.34	58	0.00	47	0.10	46	0.10	44	0.09	49	0.09
Uninsky 1932		14	0.56	6	0.02	11	0.19	13	0.79	5	0.73	15	0.76
Uninsky 1971		73	0.21	76	0.00	70	0.04	75	0.04	85	0.02	78	0.03
Wasowski 1980		15	0.55	37	0.00	19	0.14	16	0.76	6	0.71	17	0.73
Zak 1937		49	0.34	77	0.00	52	0.06	54	0.06	46	0.07	55	0.06
Zak 1951		55	0.32	65	0.00	60	0.06	59	0.06	59	0.05	61	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.06	90	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	80	0.02	86	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.04	78	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	81	0.02	85	0.02
Random 3		86	0.01	79	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	31	0.17	57	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).