Garcia 2007b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		52	0.21	67	0.00	52	0.08	47	0.08	58	0.04	54	0.06
Anderszewski 2003		70	0.09	42	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	52	0.06	57	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.54	7	0.02	3	0.26	2	0.82	17	0.69	2	0.75
Bacha 2000		47	0.25	27	0.00	40	0.07	41	0.16	29	0.29	31	0.22
Badura 1965		62	0.15	54	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	70	0.03	75	0.03
Barbosa 1983		24	0.35	31	0.00	24	0.11	15	0.59	19	0.47	14	0.53
Biret 1990		38	0.30	43	0.00	54	0.06	57	0.06	44	0.12	48	0.08
Blet 2003		12	0.41	8	0.02	11	0.22	11	0.68	24	0.53	11	0.60
Block 1995		48	0.24	23	0.00	31	0.10	36	0.31	67	0.04	42	0.11
Blumental 1952		25	0.35	62	0.00	25	0.12	22	0.52	19	0.50	15	0.51
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.37	11	0.01	27	0.12	25	0.48	34	0.31	23	0.39
Brailowsky 1960		81	0.04	46	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03
Bunin 1987		10	0.44	41	0.00	9	0.15	9	0.69	8	0.62	9	0.65
Bunin 1987b		9	0.44	16	0.00	8	0.16	8	0.69	8	0.62	6	0.65
Chiu 1999		21	0.37	25	0.00	15	0.15	19	0.55	29	0.38	17	0.46
Cohen 1997		53	0.19	19	0.00	55	0.06	56	0.06	61	0.04	58	0.05
Cortot 1951		85	-0.01	75	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Csalog 1996		50	0.23	86	0.00	46	0.07	50	0.07	53	0.06	53	0.06
Czerny 1949		89	-0.03	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	82	0.02	87	0.01
Czerny 1990		17	0.39	78	0.00	28	0.12	32	0.34	34	0.39	24	0.36
Duchoud 2007		43	0.28	79	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	56	0.05	46	0.08
Ezaki 2006		72	0.08	87	0.00	60	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.02	66	0.03
Falvay 1989		49	0.23	47	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.14	65	0.03	50	0.06
Farrell 1958		64	0.12	57	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	82	0.03	60	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		86	-0.02	51	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	58	0.06	63	0.04
Fliere 1977		14	0.40	40	0.00	22	0.10	16	0.59	45	0.11	30	0.25
Fou 1978		45	0.26	44	0.00	47	0.07	51	0.07	59	0.05	51	0.06
Francois 1956		66	0.11	88	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	67	0.03	82	0.03
Friedman 1923		41	0.28	58	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.22	47	0.10	40	0.15
Friedman 1923b		35	0.31	14	0.00	34	0.08	29	0.36	46	0.11	33	0.20
Friedman 1930		31	0.32	36	0.00	33	0.10	30	0.35	46	0.10	34	0.19
Garcia 2007		15	0.40	4	0.08	4	0.27	6	0.71	4	0.67	4	0.69
Garcia 2007b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gierzod 1998		87	-0.02	70	0.00	69	0.05	62	0.05	79	0.02	73	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		78	0.06	89	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.01	89	0.01
Groot 1988		3	0.49	5	0.04	10	0.16	10	0.68	27	0.36	16	0.49
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.18	38	0.00	62	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Hatto 1993		6	0.45	48	0.00	5	0.19	4	0.76	13	0.59	5	0.67
Hatto 1997		26	0.35	32	0.00	13	0.15	17	0.55	22	0.36	20	0.44
Horowitz 1949		8	0.44	13	0.01	16	0.18	14	0.61	24	0.53	12	0.57
Indjic 1988		4	0.48	2	0.29	2	0.30	3	0.79	9	0.65	3	0.72
Kapell 1951		30	0.33	30	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.28	45	0.08	38	0.15
Kissin 1993		27	0.35	29	0.00	35	0.09	31	0.34	42	0.28	26	0.31
Kushner 1989		11	0.42	65	0.00	12	0.18	12	0.65	13	0.58	10	0.61
Luisada 1991		1	0.55	1	0.31	1	0.30	1	0.83	5	0.77	1	0.80
Lushtak 2004		57	0.17	9	0.01	49	0.08	46	0.08	37	0.13	43	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.37	17	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.54	27	0.28	22	0.39
Magaloff 1978		54	0.18	49	0.00	56	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.04	59	0.04
Magin 1975		19	0.39	10	0.01	17	0.13	26	0.46	33	0.42	18	0.44
Michalowski 1933		7	0.44	3	0.10	7	0.25	7	0.71	8	0.60	7	0.65
Milkina 1970		71	0.09	34	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	70	0.03
Mohovich 1999		80	0.05	63	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.03	76	0.03
Moravec 1969		59	0.16	76	0.00	53	0.07	52	0.07	62	0.04	55	0.05
Morozova 2008		39	0.30	24	0.00	29	0.13	34	0.31	43	0.10	36	0.18
Neighaus 1950		42	0.28	68	0.00	50	0.06	53	0.06	86	0.02	78	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.30	45	0.00	32	0.09	35	0.31	52	0.06	41	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.18	37	0.00	61	0.04	73	0.04	79	0.04	61	0.04
Osinska 1989		75	0.07	52	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	83	0.02
Pachmann 1927		51	0.23	53	0.00	45	0.07	49	0.07	66	0.05	52	0.06
Paderewski 1930		28	0.34	22	0.00	21	0.10	24	0.52	31	0.38	19	0.44
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.26	80	0.00	57	0.06	55	0.06	56	0.05	56	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		18	0.39	20	0.00	14	0.16	18	0.55	15	0.53	13	0.54
Poblocka 1999		34	0.31	26	0.00	41	0.08	42	0.16	65	0.05	44	0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.10	81	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.02	85	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.31	50	0.00	38	0.09	38	0.23	35	0.21	32	0.22
Rangell 2001		73	0.08	59	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03
Richter 1976		29	0.34	18	0.00	23	0.11	23	0.52	42	0.32	21	0.41
Rosen 1989		68	0.10	82	0.00	70	0.05	59	0.05	75	0.03	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		65	0.12	64	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		88	-0.02	73	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.03	83	0.00	74	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.06	90	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.02	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.06	15	0.00	59	0.08	48	0.08	46	0.07	49	0.07
Rossi 2007		84	0.00	66	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	80	0.03	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		69	0.09	74	0.00	71	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.03	69	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.14	84	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.02	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.16	69	0.00	51	0.06	54	0.06	79	0.03	62	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		40	0.29	39	0.00	48	0.09	45	0.09	30	0.30	37	0.16
Shebanova 2002		5	0.47	6	0.03	6	0.30	5	0.76	27	0.56	8	0.65
Smith 1975		74	0.07	71	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	90	0.01	86	0.01
Sokolov 2002		60	0.16	28	0.00	66	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.02	68	0.03
Sztompka 1959		23	0.36	85	0.00	19	0.07	21	0.54	44	0.13	29	0.26
Tomsic 1995		32	0.32	12	0.01	26	0.12	27	0.43	32	0.20	27	0.29
Uninsky 1932		13	0.40	21	0.00	20	0.09	13	0.61	42	0.18	25	0.33
Uninsky 1971		58	0.17	35	0.00	65	0.05	60	0.05	88	0.02	71	0.03
Wasowski 1980		16	0.39	56	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.41	48	0.08	35	0.18
Zak 1937		36	0.30	33	0.00	36	0.08	33	0.33	36	0.23	28	0.28
Zak 1951		44	0.27	55	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.17	43	0.13	39	0.15
Random 1		82	0.03	72	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	34	0.21	47	0.08
Random 2		79	0.06	60	0.00	82	0.04	70	0.04	31	0.22	45	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.05	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	88	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).