Magaloff 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		71	0.19	40	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.04	87	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		84	0.08	36	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		44	0.32	80	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	67	0.06	55	0.08
Bacha 2000		72	0.19	74	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	48	0.06	71	0.04
Badura 1965		75	0.18	25	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.05	78	0.04
Barbosa 1983		67	0.21	46	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	70	0.04	75	0.04
Biret 1990		66	0.21	69	0.00	65	0.04	64	0.04	49	0.07	68	0.05
Blet 2003		60	0.26	55	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	49	0.08	60	0.06
Block 1995		8	0.54	8	0.02	4	0.19	11	0.70	6	0.72	11	0.71
Blumental 1952		76	0.18	59	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.04	79	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.50	11	0.01	12	0.24	15	0.56	16	0.53	17	0.54
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.27	33	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.12	52	0.08
Bunin 1987		51	0.29	41	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	43	0.13	56	0.08
Bunin 1987b		52	0.29	23	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	43	0.11	57	0.07
Chiu 1999		35	0.36	51	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.44	34	0.31	31	0.37
Cohen 1997		32	0.38	24	0.00	37	0.08	41	0.19	32	0.39	39	0.27
Cortot 1951		36	0.36	47	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.40	9	0.61	21	0.49
Csalog 1996		25	0.41	48	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.43	13	0.56	20	0.49
Czerny 1949		85	0.08	70	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.06	77	0.04
Czerny 1990		77	0.17	60	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	56	0.07	67	0.05
Duchoud 2007		63	0.24	45	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	67	0.04	66	0.05
Ezaki 2006		48	0.30	37	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	29	0.37	42	0.15
Falvay 1989		79	0.16	6	0.03	45	0.07	46	0.07	44	0.12	50	0.09
Farrell 1958		78	0.16	52	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	40	0.16	53	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.00	73	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.04	86	0.03
Fliere 1977		1	0.63	1	0.50	1	0.50	1	0.84	7	0.81	1	0.82
Fou 1978		54	0.29	12	0.01	43	0.06	44	0.12	43	0.14	45	0.13
Francois 1956		49	0.30	81	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	40	0.22	51	0.09
Friedman 1923		9	0.54	15	0.01	9	0.16	6	0.73	7	0.77	4	0.75
Friedman 1923b		10	0.53	75	0.00	10	0.19	10	0.71	7	0.78	6	0.74
Friedman 1930		16	0.45	16	0.01	14	0.12	12	0.61	13	0.65	12	0.63
Garcia 2007		40	0.34	9	0.01	21	0.08	24	0.44	23	0.43	26	0.43
Garcia 2007b		73	0.18	64	0.00	72	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.05	80	0.04
Gierzod 1998		45	0.31	86	0.00	34	0.09	32	0.36	20	0.54	23	0.44
Gornostaeva 1994		15	0.45	10	0.01	20	0.11	20	0.47	15	0.64	16	0.55
Groot 1988		22	0.42	27	0.00	23	0.10	18	0.49	37	0.22	37	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955		31	0.38	39	0.00	38	0.09	36	0.30	50	0.06	46	0.13
Hatto 1993		64	0.23	82	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	62	0.07	69	0.05
Hatto 1997		80	0.15	83	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Horowitz 1949		29	0.39	29	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.27	27	0.46	34	0.35
Indjic 1988		70	0.19	87	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.06	74	0.04
Kapell 1951		74	0.18	84	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.05	73	0.04
Kissin 1993		42	0.33	20	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.37	28	0.50	25	0.43
Kushner 1989		27	0.39	65	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.35	31	0.36	33	0.35
Luisada 1991		50	0.30	31	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.06	62	0.05
Lushtak 2004		39	0.34	66	0.00	27	0.07	31	0.37	9	0.52	24	0.44
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.49	2	0.10	6	0.18	7	0.72	2	0.71	10	0.71
Magaloff 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		38	0.34	61	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.26	29	0.46	32	0.35
Michalowski 1933		19	0.43	18	0.00	24	0.08	29	0.38	29	0.39	30	0.38
Milkina 1970		86	0.03	76	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	70	0.03	82	0.03
Mohovich 1999		30	0.38	44	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.33	21	0.37	35	0.35
Moravec 1969		69	0.20	71	0.00	64	0.05	61	0.05	77	0.03	72	0.04
Morozova 2008		28	0.39	32	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.46	27	0.33	28	0.39
Neighaus 1950		14	0.46	30	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.55	21	0.38	22	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		20	0.43	13	0.01	36	0.06	37	0.28	37	0.21	41	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.54	14	0.01	7	0.19	3	0.76	3	0.68	9	0.72
Osinska 1989		5	0.56	7	0.02	8	0.20	8	0.72	5	0.77	5	0.74
Pachmann 1927		4	0.59	3	0.08	3	0.26	2	0.79	1	0.85	2	0.82
Paderewski 1930		24	0.41	17	0.00	19	0.11	17	0.51	18	0.60	15	0.55
Perlemuter 1992		2	0.60	5	0.05	5	0.24	4	0.73	3	0.79	3	0.76
Pierdomenico 2008		21	0.42	28	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.42	12	0.60	19	0.50
Poblocka 1999		33	0.36	42	0.00	25	0.10	35	0.33	38	0.24	38	0.28
Rabcewiczowa 1932		46	0.31	43	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.26	48	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		53	0.29	72	0.00	58	0.07	47	0.07	34	0.23	44	0.13
Rangell 2001		59	0.27	62	0.00	52	0.07	45	0.07	58	0.05	61	0.06
Richter 1976		7	0.54	49	0.00	11	0.30	9	0.72	18	0.75	7	0.73
Rosen 1989		3	0.59	4	0.07	2	0.30	5	0.73	5	0.73	8	0.73
Rosenthal 1930		57	0.27	38	0.00	62	0.05	60	0.05	36	0.30	47	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.11	63	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	43	0.16	58	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.14	88	0.00	82	0.04	73	0.04	48	0.07	70	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		43	0.33	56	0.00	41	0.09	40	0.23	18	0.51	36	0.34
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.11	77	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	53	0.04	89	0.03
Rossi 2007		23	0.42	19	0.00	17	0.12	19	0.48	2	0.81	13	0.62
Rubinstein 1939		68	0.20	53	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.43	34	0.00	18	0.15	14	0.58	10	0.61	14	0.59
Rubinstein 1966		56	0.27	54	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	68	0.04	76	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		55	0.27	67	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	38	0.23	49	0.11
Shebanova 2002		13	0.47	26	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.60	34	0.44	18	0.51
Smith 1975		41	0.34	78	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	30	0.37	43	0.15
Sokolov 2002		34	0.36	79	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.15	25	0.39	40	0.24
Sztompka 1959		17	0.44	35	0.00	31	0.09	25	0.44	32	0.37	27	0.40
Tomsic 1995		65	0.22	58	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	82	0.03	83	0.03
Uninsky 1932		26	0.40	21	0.00	13	0.10	21	0.47	33	0.32	29	0.39
Uninsky 1971		47	0.30	22	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.06	59	0.06
Wasowski 1980		37	0.35	57	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.06	63	0.05
Zak 1937		61	0.25	85	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	53	0.06	64	0.05
Zak 1951		62	0.25	68	0.00	63	0.05	54	0.05	61	0.05	65	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.02	89	0.00	87	0.02	89	0.02	46	0.05	88	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.08	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.03	90	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	50	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	24	0.29	54	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).