Boshniakovich 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		66	0.23	72	0.00	65	0.06	59	0.06	64	0.04	70	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		52	0.29	26	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.35	8	0.60	27	0.46
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.37	55	0.00	33	0.10	35	0.30	42	0.16	38	0.22
Bacha 2000		58	0.26	77	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	50	0.06	65	0.05
Badura 1965		62	0.25	42	0.00	58	0.06	54	0.06	30	0.38	39	0.15
Barbosa 1983		24	0.42	41	0.00	20	0.13	13	0.57	5	0.67	11	0.62
Biret 1990		72	0.17	56	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	53	0.06	77	0.04
Blet 2003		47	0.32	73	0.00	53	0.07	48	0.07	44	0.15	51	0.10
Block 1995		1	0.54	10	0.02	5	0.23	1	0.77	3	0.77	4	0.77
Blumental 1952		54	0.27	44	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	44	0.10	58	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.33	39	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.24	15	0.56	31	0.37
Bunin 1987		56	0.26	12	0.01	59	0.05	63	0.05	51	0.07	64	0.06
Bunin 1987b		59	0.26	78	0.00	60	0.05	67	0.05	47	0.07	60	0.06
Chiu 1999		51	0.29	79	0.00	57	0.08	45	0.08	48	0.08	55	0.08
Cohen 1997		53	0.27	86	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	52	0.06	54	0.09
Cortot 1951		69	0.19	51	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	34	0.30	50	0.11
Csalog 1996		61	0.25	49	0.00	66	0.06	53	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.06
Czerny 1949		87	-0.05	87	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	87	0.02
Czerny 1990		70	0.19	80	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.06	71	0.05
Duchoud 2007		64	0.24	47	0.00	61	0.06	60	0.06	50	0.07	63	0.06
Ezaki 2006		57	0.26	63	0.00	56	0.06	56	0.06	37	0.23	45	0.12
Falvay 1989		77	0.14	64	0.00	69	0.07	46	0.07	72	0.03	68	0.05
Farrell 1958		83	0.03	88	0.00	84	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		85	0.00	68	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.06	76	0.04
Fliere 1977		2	0.54	6	0.09	6	0.20	6	0.69	15	0.72	7	0.70
Fou 1978		35	0.35	7	0.03	26	0.12	27	0.42	20	0.43	29	0.42
Francois 1956		73	0.16	34	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923		22	0.43	14	0.01	23	0.14	24	0.49	19	0.59	25	0.54
Friedman 1923b		18	0.44	30	0.00	22	0.20	23	0.49	18	0.62	20	0.55
Friedman 1930		19	0.44	29	0.00	24	0.14	17	0.53	20	0.60	17	0.56
Garcia 2007		6	0.52	2	0.13	4	0.19	3	0.76	1	0.78	3	0.77
Garcia 2007b		31	0.37	33	0.00	31	0.10	34	0.31	25	0.48	30	0.39
Gierzod 1998		48	0.31	22	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.16	18	0.57	34	0.30
Gornostaeva 1994		63	0.24	81	0.00	67	0.07	47	0.07	39	0.21	47	0.12
Groot 1988		27	0.40	75	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.24	54	0.07	44	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.44	37	0.00	21	0.17	12	0.59	10	0.55	15	0.57
Hatto 1993		50	0.30	45	0.00	45	0.05	65	0.05	44	0.13	56	0.08
Hatto 1997		76	0.14	46	0.00	68	0.05	62	0.05	74	0.03	75	0.04
Horowitz 1949		25	0.41	59	0.00	34	0.10	36	0.29	30	0.43	32	0.35
Indjic 1988		55	0.26	61	0.00	46	0.06	58	0.06	50	0.08	57	0.07
Kapell 1951		36	0.34	40	0.00	27	0.11	32	0.33	24	0.34	33	0.33
Kissin 1993		46	0.32	57	0.00	48	0.06	57	0.06	41	0.28	42	0.13
Kushner 1989		15	0.45	24	0.00	16	0.10	15	0.55	17	0.54	23	0.54
Luisada 1991		26	0.41	18	0.01	28	0.10	25	0.46	26	0.47	26	0.46
Lushtak 2004		17	0.44	9	0.02	14	0.08	18	0.53	2	0.69	13	0.60
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.47	50	0.00	18	0.10	21	0.51	12	0.59	18	0.55
Magaloff 1978		8	0.50	5	0.09	9	0.19	16	0.53	15	0.56	22	0.54
Magin 1975		37	0.34	52	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	41	0.23	46	0.12
Michalowski 1933		34	0.36	65	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.16	49	0.07	49	0.11
Milkina 1970		84	0.01	82	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Mohovich 1999		3	0.54	1	0.23	1	0.23	2	0.76	2	0.76	5	0.76
Moravec 1969		80	0.12	76	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Morozova 2008		45	0.32	31	0.00	30	0.10	33	0.32	53	0.05	43	0.13
Neighaus 1950		11	0.49	16	0.01	11	0.13	9	0.65	5	0.55	14	0.60
Niedzielski 1931		30	0.37	27	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.25	35	0.23	36	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.37	21	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.34	36	0.14	37	0.22
Osinska 1989		29	0.38	35	0.00	36	0.08	28	0.37	21	0.53	28	0.44
Pachmann 1927		5	0.53	15	0.01	7	0.20	7	0.68	7	0.83	6	0.75
Paderewski 1930		23	0.43	28	0.00	25	0.13	20	0.51	16	0.61	16	0.56
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.49	32	0.00	13	0.11	19	0.52	7	0.72	12	0.61
Pierdomenico 2008		38	0.33	54	0.00	55	0.05	66	0.05	46	0.07	59	0.06
Poblocka 1999		16	0.45	36	0.00	17	0.09	22	0.50	7	0.59	21	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.22	53	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	49	0.08	69	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		75	0.15	89	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03
Rangell 2001		20	0.44	8	0.03	10	0.15	11	0.61	4	0.66	10	0.63
Richter 1976		12	0.49	17	0.01	15	0.10	10	0.63	23	0.71	8	0.67
Rosen 1989		13	0.48	4	0.10	8	0.21	8	0.68	8	0.66	9	0.67
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.09	58	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	66	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.03	83	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	50	0.05	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.12	62	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	45	0.10	72	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		74	0.15	66	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.04	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.12	90	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	49	0.05	78	0.04
Rossi 2007		71	0.17	69	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	24	0.29	52	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		86	-0.01	84	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	89	0.02	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.33	25	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	34	0.26	48	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.32	74	0.00	32	0.09	30	0.34	30	0.25	35	0.29
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.40	13	0.01	19	0.11	26	0.44	3	0.70	19	0.55
Shebanova 2002		9	0.50	48	0.00	12	0.09	14	0.55	30	0.53	24	0.54
Smith 1975		68	0.20	38	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	52	0.06	73	0.04
Sokolov 2002		65	0.24	20	0.00	50	0.07	49	0.07	60	0.03	67	0.05
Sztompka 1959		43	0.32	60	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.13	57	0.06	53	0.09
Tomsic 1995		42	0.33	23	0.00	47	0.07	50	0.07	27	0.26	41	0.13
Uninsky 1932		39	0.33	43	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.06
Uninsky 1971		60	0.25	19	0.00	37	0.07	42	0.14	43	0.14	40	0.14
Wasowski 1980		49	0.30	70	0.00	54	0.06	61	0.06	60	0.05	66	0.05
Zak 1937		4	0.53	3	0.13	2	0.20	4	0.74	2	0.82	1	0.78
Zak 1951		7	0.51	11	0.01	3	0.21	5	0.72	2	0.82	2	0.77
Random 1		88	-0.06	67	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.08	85	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	85	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.07	71	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).