Schilhawsky 1960

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		8	0.70	34	0.00	17	0.10	20	0.43	25	0.34	25	0.38
Anderszewski 2003		36	0.62	17	0.01	22	0.08	37	0.25	16	0.34	36	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.61	24	0.01	27	0.09	23	0.40	28	0.29	33	0.34
Bacha 2000		80	0.40	81	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	83	0.03	80	0.03
Badura 1965		34	0.62	31	0.00	28	0.09	33	0.32	16	0.38	30	0.35
Barbosa 1983		64	0.50	37	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	40	0.14	59	0.07
Biret 1990		58	0.54	16	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.12	50	0.06	56	0.08
Blet 2003		22	0.67	61	0.00	35	0.10	28	0.36	19	0.33	31	0.34
Block 1995		69	0.48	26	0.01	48	0.07	47	0.07	37	0.15	52	0.10
Blumental 1952		76	0.44	41	0.00	55	0.04	71	0.04	49	0.04	76	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.62	27	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.15	20	0.36	39	0.23
Brailowsky 1960		72	0.46	66	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	45	0.07	62	0.05
Bunin 1987		10	0.69	12	0.02	9	0.13	14	0.45	3	0.57	10	0.51
Bunin 1987b		15	0.69	9	0.04	8	0.10	12	0.45	3	0.57	8	0.51
Chiu 1999		75	0.44	36	0.00	66	0.06	49	0.06	67	0.03	71	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.24	68	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	53	0.05	78	0.04
Cortot 1951		9	0.70	59	0.00	19	0.15	15	0.45	5	0.61	5	0.52
Csalog 1996		78	0.43	73	0.00	73	0.04	70	0.04	68	0.04	75	0.04
Czerny 1949		3	0.76	6	0.05	4	0.19	4	0.53	11	0.50	9	0.51
Czerny 1990		16	0.68	48	0.00	34	0.08	32	0.32	38	0.14	41	0.21
Duchoud 2007		44	0.60	45	0.00	33	0.07	35	0.27	10	0.42	32	0.34
Ezaki 2006		19	0.68	32	0.00	32	0.06	27	0.36	38	0.16	37	0.24
Falvay 1989		82	0.40	74	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	72	0.04	82	0.03
Farrell 1958		56	0.55	13	0.02	62	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.06	65	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.63	55	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.29	7	0.44	29	0.36
Fliere 1977		1	0.77	18	0.01	5	0.15	10	0.50	17	0.40	16	0.45
Fou 1978		67	0.49	83	0.00	68	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	73	0.04
Francois 1956		45	0.59	69	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	45	0.05	68	0.05
Friedman 1923		65	0.50	33	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	14	0.45	47	0.15
Friedman 1923b		62	0.51	75	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	13	0.46	43	0.18
Friedman 1930		46	0.58	29	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	16	0.42	42	0.19
Garcia 2007		55	0.55	60	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.17	5	0.53	35	0.30
Garcia 2007b		81	0.40	79	0.00	64	0.06	50	0.06	24	0.20	51	0.11
Gierzod 1998		4	0.74	8	0.04	6	0.11	5	0.53	11	0.46	12	0.49
Gornostaeva 1994		59	0.53	57	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.03	87	0.03
Groot 1988		48	0.58	49	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	48	0.05	79	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.69	21	0.01	12	0.09	6	0.52	13	0.44	13	0.48
Hatto 1993		50	0.57	14	0.02	14	0.11	29	0.36	9	0.57	19	0.45
Hatto 1997		41	0.60	19	0.01	11	0.09	21	0.42	5	0.53	14	0.47
Horowitz 1949		14	0.69	7	0.04	20	0.09	9	0.50	3	0.64	3	0.57
Indjic 1988		47	0.58	23	0.01	13	0.09	26	0.36	7	0.57	17	0.45
Kapell 1951		5	0.74	22	0.01	3	0.14	7	0.51	3	0.51	7	0.51
Kissin 1993		31	0.63	3	0.07	36	0.07	39	0.22	28	0.24	38	0.23
Kushner 1989		30	0.63	53	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05	66	0.05
Luisada 1991		53	0.56	67	0.00	56	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.04	70	0.04
Lushtak 2004		20	0.67	5	0.05	10	0.12	13	0.45	15	0.35	24	0.40
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.62	77	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	30	0.19	49	0.11
Magaloff 1978		60	0.53	30	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	58	0.05	63	0.05
Magin 1975		52	0.56	47	0.00	42	0.08	42	0.16	36	0.15	46	0.15
Michalowski 1933		42	0.60	51	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.42	6	0.50	15	0.46
Milkina 1970		61	0.53	43	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	47	0.06	67	0.05
Mohovich 1999		51	0.57	88	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	66	0.04	77	0.04
Moravec 1969		68	0.49	64	0.00	78	0.04	75	0.04	53	0.04	69	0.04
Morozova 2008		33	0.62	63	0.00	38	0.08	36	0.26	36	0.17	40	0.21
Neighaus 1950		17	0.68	20	0.01	15	0.08	8	0.50	14	0.40	18	0.45
Niedzielski 1931		26	0.65	10	0.03	21	0.10	18	0.44	3	0.59	6	0.51
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.66	58	0.00	26	0.08	16	0.44	17	0.39	23	0.41
Osinska 1989		37	0.61	62	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.05
Pachmann 1927		66	0.49	56	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	38	0.12	58	0.07
Paderewski 1930		49	0.57	80	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	32	0.18	53	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		24	0.66	25	0.01	30	0.09	31	0.33	12	0.41	26	0.37
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.41	78	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03
Poblocka 1999		2	0.77	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.61	4	0.55	2	0.58
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.55	46	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.05	64	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		25	0.65	44	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.34	13	0.40	27	0.37
Rangell 2001		84	0.35	84	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	58	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		7	0.71	4	0.06	7	0.12	2	0.55	2	0.64	1	0.59
Rosen 1989		63	0.51	54	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		43	0.60	39	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	13	0.47	45	0.17
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.46	76	0.00	77	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.18	54	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.45	82	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	30	0.21	57	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.55	11	0.02	58	0.04	62	0.04	24	0.32	50	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.44	15	0.01	76	0.03	77	0.03	35	0.16	60	0.07
Rossi 2007		86	0.29	72	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.04	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.32	85	0.00	86	0.03	88	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.36	35	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.04	89	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		70	0.47	52	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.04	85	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		38	0.61	28	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.22	41	0.13	44	0.17
Smith 1975		39	0.61	38	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	65	0.04	72	0.04
Sokolov 2002		27	0.64	86	0.00	29	0.12	24	0.39	11	0.46	20	0.42
Sztompka 1959		12	0.69	65	0.00	23	0.07	25	0.39	21	0.36	28	0.37
Tomsic 1995		73	0.45	89	0.00	82	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04	74	0.04
Uninsky 1932		21	0.67	50	0.00	16	0.08	17	0.44	7	0.56	11	0.50
Uninsky 1971		6	0.73	2	0.14	2	0.18	3	0.55	3	0.59	4	0.57
Wasowski 1980		28	0.64	40	0.00	40	0.08	38	0.25	11	0.38	34	0.31
Zak 1937		18	0.68	42	0.00	24	0.08	19	0.44	20	0.39	22	0.41
Zak 1951		11	0.69	70	0.00	18	0.12	11	0.46	16	0.38	21	0.42
Random 1		89	-0.06	71	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	23	0.34	55	0.08
Random 2		88	-0.03	87	0.00	88	0.03	87	0.03	8	0.46	48	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.16	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).