Rosenthal 1931b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		59	0.39	70	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	69	0.03	60	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.51	45	0.00	15	0.08	21	0.33	74	0.03	27	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		52	0.41	11	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	78	0.03	79	0.03
Bacha 2000		37	0.44	77	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	64	0.05	42	0.05
Badura 1965		86	0.22	23	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.02	89	0.02
Barbosa 1983		87	0.17	78	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	87	0.02	86	0.02
Biret 1990		26	0.48	27	0.00	41	0.04	42	0.08	78	0.04	41	0.06
Blet 2003		60	0.38	61	0.00	63	0.05	47	0.05	81	0.03	56	0.04
Block 1995		53	0.41	46	0.00	46	0.04	58	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Blumental 1952		67	0.35	5	0.00	33	0.05	33	0.11	86	0.02	46	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		47	0.42	62	0.00	53	0.04	66	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.58	79	0.00	7	0.23	10	0.52	17	0.39	6	0.45
Bunin 1987		70	0.33	55	0.00	72	0.04	62	0.04	58	0.05	62	0.04
Bunin 1987b		71	0.33	28	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.05	54	0.04
Chiu 1999		81	0.28	47	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	83	0.03	50	0.04
Cohen 1997		73	0.32	16	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	21	0.26	18	0.14
Cortot 1951		62	0.37	48	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		64	0.36	22	0.00	69	0.03	72	0.03	60	0.04	73	0.03
Czerny 1949		61	0.38	14	0.00	65	0.04	64	0.04	85	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1990		27	0.47	24	0.00	30	0.08	20	0.33	62	0.04	25	0.11
Duchoud 2007		66	0.35	49	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Ezaki 2006		25	0.48	6	0.00	31	0.10	27	0.26	84	0.03	30	0.09
Falvay 1989		17	0.52	50	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.50	31	0.33	7	0.41
Farrell 1958		29	0.47	71	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.31	49	0.06	17	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		77	0.30	34	0.00	87	0.04	70	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.04
Fliere 1977		13	0.56	39	0.00	20	0.08	14	0.45	77	0.03	20	0.12
Fou 1978		21	0.51	13	0.00	11	0.13	13	0.47	46	0.07	13	0.18
Francois 1956		32	0.46	12	0.00	42	0.04	40	0.09	87	0.02	63	0.04
Friedman 1923		85	0.22	30	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.04	83	0.03
Friedman 1923b		84	0.23	40	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	68	0.05	80	0.03
Friedman 1930		72	0.32	41	0.00	67	0.04	63	0.04	77	0.04	58	0.04
Garcia 2007		42	0.43	8	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	66	0.04	61	0.04
Garcia 2007b		63	0.37	72	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.05
Gierzod 1998		16	0.53	15	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.20	86	0.03	34	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.63	29	0.00	6	0.18	7	0.54	25	0.29	8	0.40
Groot 1988		30	0.46	17	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.32	66	0.04	26	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		51	0.42	20	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.32	81	0.03	29	0.10
Hatto 1993		80	0.29	80	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Hatto 1997		76	0.30	56	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Horowitz 1949		45	0.43	18	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	77	0.03	55	0.04
Indjic 1988		78	0.29	81	0.00	80	0.04	61	0.04	82	0.03	72	0.03
Kapell 1951		28	0.47	73	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	80	0.03	52	0.04
Kissin 1993		22	0.50	82	0.00	16	0.08	17	0.37	59	0.04	21	0.12
Kushner 1989		9	0.58	83	0.00	22	0.09	26	0.29	63	0.04	24	0.11
Luisada 1991		36	0.44	51	0.00	35	0.05	35	0.10	86	0.02	49	0.04
Lushtak 2004		68	0.34	42	0.00	40	0.04	43	0.08	77	0.03	45	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.57	35	0.00	21	0.09	19	0.35	47	0.05	19	0.13
Magaloff 1978		5	0.66	52	0.00	5	0.37	5	0.63	12	0.42	5	0.51
Magin 1975		12	0.57	57	0.00	13	0.11	12	0.48	49	0.05	16	0.15
Michalowski 1933		75	0.30	19	0.00	76	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	85	0.02
Milkina 1970		7	0.60	74	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.52	46	0.07	11	0.19
Mohovich 1999		18	0.52	63	0.00	24	0.07	18	0.35	75	0.03	28	0.10
Moravec 1969		19	0.51	9	0.00	14	0.10	15	0.39	29	0.33	9	0.36
Morozova 2008		57	0.40	53	0.00	38	0.04	36	0.10	76	0.03	44	0.05
Neighaus 1950		35	0.44	43	0.00	60	0.07	45	0.07	80	0.04	47	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.44	44	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.08	60	0.04	38	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		56	0.40	84	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	80	0.03	70	0.03
Osinska 1989		31	0.46	75	0.00	57	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	64	0.03
Pachmann 1927		49	0.42	64	0.00	45	0.04	60	0.04	40	0.11	37	0.07
Paderewski 1930		39	0.44	31	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	73	0.03	68	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.43	10	0.00	28	0.07	24	0.32	65	0.04	22	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		54	0.41	36	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.04
Poblocka 1999		55	0.41	76	0.00	74	0.03	73	0.03	73	0.04	65	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.43	25	0.00	18	0.09	28	0.23	48	0.05	23	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.53	32	0.00	12	0.13	8	0.52	50	0.05	15	0.16
Rangell 2001		23	0.50	21	0.00	25	0.07	32	0.20	52	0.04	31	0.09
Richter 1976		69	0.33	33	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03
Rosen 1989		14	0.54	37	0.00	26	0.07	29	0.23	86	0.03	35	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.76	4	0.00	4	0.59	4	0.85	3	0.82	4	0.83
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.98	1	0.61	1	0.60	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.87	3	0.01	3	0.85	3	0.95	1	0.93	3	0.94
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.97	2	0.38	2	0.95	2	0.99	1	0.98	2	0.98
Rossi 2007		79	0.29	7	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.10	47	0.06	32	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		48	0.42	65	0.00	36	0.04	37	0.10	22	0.31	12	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.46	66	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.38	36	0.24	10	0.30
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.43	67	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	73	0.04	57	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.45	58	0.00	27	0.07	30	0.21	78	0.03	33	0.08
Shebanova 2002		50	0.42	68	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.03	75	0.03
Smith 1975		10	0.57	26	0.00	10	0.12	6	0.57	52	0.05	14	0.17
Sokolov 2002		24	0.49	85	0.00	39	0.04	39	0.09	72	0.03	43	0.05
Sztompka 1959		65	0.36	86	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.04	69	0.03
Tomsic 1995		58	0.40	38	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	66	0.03
Uninsky 1932		82	0.28	69	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.03	87	0.02
Uninsky 1971		74	0.30	87	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03
Wasowski 1980		83	0.27	88	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.02	84	0.02
Zak 1937		38	0.44	59	0.00	49	0.05	46	0.05	86	0.03	53	0.04
Zak 1951		41	0.43	54	0.00	34	0.05	34	0.11	79	0.03	39	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.08	60	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	19	0.36	36	0.08
Random 2		88	-0.07	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.16	40	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.10	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).