Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		38	0.50	33	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.17	61	0.04	38	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.49	37	0.00	20	0.07	34	0.21	49	0.04	34	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		50	0.47	52	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.04
Bacha 2000		65	0.40	47	0.00	68	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.04	61	0.03
Badura 1965		75	0.36	58	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.14	60	0.04	43	0.07
Barbosa 1983		87	0.20	83	0.00	71	0.03	67	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.03
Biret 1990		37	0.50	84	0.00	45	0.04	55	0.04	86	0.03	79	0.03
Blet 2003		45	0.48	40	0.00	60	0.04	53	0.04	83	0.03	72	0.03
Block 1995		76	0.36	28	0.00	64	0.03	66	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Blumental 1952		57	0.43	6	0.01	25	0.07	33	0.22	60	0.04	36	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		41	0.48	77	0.00	48	0.03	73	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.48	59	0.00	47	0.03	71	0.03	68	0.04	62	0.03
Bunin 1987		62	0.41	89	0.00	73	0.05	45	0.05	68	0.04	59	0.04
Bunin 1987b		63	0.41	63	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.04	66	0.03
Chiu 1999		86	0.21	26	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.03
Cohen 1997		78	0.31	62	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	25	0.23	28	0.11
Cortot 1951		31	0.52	51	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.05	49	0.05
Csalog 1996		47	0.47	22	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.05	55	0.04
Czerny 1949		30	0.53	53	0.00	36	0.07	28	0.28	42	0.08	18	0.15
Czerny 1990		13	0.60	23	0.00	8	0.15	8	0.56	54	0.05	12	0.17
Duchoud 2007		55	0.44	90	0.00	54	0.04	52	0.04	76	0.03	76	0.03
Ezaki 2006		22	0.55	43	0.00	13	0.11	11	0.50	51	0.05	13	0.16
Falvay 1989		26	0.55	15	0.00	10	0.11	13	0.47	28	0.36	8	0.41
Farrell 1958		48	0.47	16	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.11	71	0.04	41	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.42	34	0.00	74	0.02	83	0.02	69	0.04	73	0.03
Fliere 1977		8	0.64	54	0.00	14	0.12	10	0.53	68	0.03	22	0.13
Fou 1978		43	0.48	24	0.00	27	0.07	25	0.31	47	0.07	15	0.15
Francois 1956		24	0.55	56	0.00	32	0.08	23	0.33	60	0.04	29	0.11
Friedman 1923		85	0.26	78	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	53	0.06	60	0.04
Friedman 1923b		84	0.26	39	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	53	0.06	78	0.03
Friedman 1930		69	0.39	70	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	50	0.05	57	0.04
Garcia 2007		72	0.38	72	0.00	77	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.27	67	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.03
Gierzod 1998		9	0.62	48	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.42	54	0.05	21	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.67	32	0.00	7	0.22	5	0.67	17	0.39	6	0.51
Groot 1988		42	0.48	68	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.18	72	0.03	44	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		71	0.38	73	0.00	18	0.08	30	0.27	76	0.03	37	0.09
Hatto 1993		82	0.29	27	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Hatto 1997		79	0.31	29	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.03	86	0.02
Horowitz 1949		60	0.42	60	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.02	84	0.02
Indjic 1988		80	0.30	87	0.00	86	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.03
Kapell 1951		14	0.60	31	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.28	76	0.04	25	0.11
Kissin 1993		17	0.57	9	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.43	57	0.05	17	0.15
Kushner 1989		10	0.62	44	0.00	22	0.08	20	0.40	67	0.04	23	0.13
Luisada 1991		66	0.40	80	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.08	72	0.04	45	0.06
Lushtak 2004		59	0.42	35	0.00	34	0.06	31	0.25	75	0.03	35	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.65	18	0.00	9	0.15	17	0.43	16	0.33	10	0.38
Magaloff 1978		5	0.69	11	0.00	5	0.28	6	0.64	15	0.41	5	0.51
Magin 1975		21	0.55	8	0.01	29	0.06	27	0.30	67	0.03	33	0.09
Michalowski 1933		68	0.40	21	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	66	0.05	54	0.04
Milkina 1970		11	0.62	45	0.00	23	0.12	15	0.45	54	0.05	16	0.15
Mohovich 1999		23	0.55	69	0.00	26	0.08	19	0.40	85	0.03	27	0.11
Moravec 1969		16	0.59	19	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.49	12	0.44	7	0.46
Morozova 2008		56	0.43	20	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.18	86	0.02	46	0.06
Neighaus 1950		39	0.49	71	0.00	46	0.03	69	0.03	72	0.04	80	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		34	0.50	25	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	82	0.03	64	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.50	5	0.01	44	0.05	42	0.09	53	0.05	42	0.07
Osinska 1989		20	0.56	61	0.00	40	0.09	35	0.20	47	0.05	30	0.10
Pachmann 1927		67	0.40	81	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	52	0.05	53	0.04
Paderewski 1930		19	0.56	64	0.00	30	0.06	36	0.19	47	0.05	31	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.46	17	0.00	28	0.10	22	0.35	63	0.04	24	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		70	0.38	79	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.03	83	0.02
Poblocka 1999		27	0.54	46	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.53	38	0.00	17	0.09	26	0.31	45	0.06	20	0.14
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.54	13	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.54	55	0.05	14	0.16
Rangell 2001		33	0.50	88	0.00	43	0.03	44	0.07	84	0.03	48	0.05
Richter 1976		73	0.37	49	0.00	75	0.02	84	0.02	75	0.03	85	0.02
Rosen 1989		18	0.56	55	0.00	39	0.07	32	0.23	74	0.03	39	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		3	0.87	2	0.20	3	0.46	4	0.90	1	0.89	4	0.89
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.87	1	0.55	1	0.54	3	0.92	3	0.94	2	0.93
Rosenthal 1931b		2	0.87	4	0.07	2	0.46	1	0.93	3	0.95	1	0.94
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		4	0.86	3	0.11	4	0.81	2	0.93	3	0.94	3	0.93
Rossi 2007		81	0.29	12	0.00	52	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.15	32	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		64	0.40	36	0.00	67	0.03	64	0.03	36	0.18	40	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		35	0.50	14	0.00	24	0.07	21	0.37	32	0.26	11	0.31
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.47	65	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	71	0.04	56	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		25	0.55	7	0.01	16	0.08	24	0.32	62	0.04	26	0.11
Shebanova 2002		44	0.48	50	0.00	66	0.03	63	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03
Smith 1975		12	0.62	10	0.00	6	0.19	7	0.63	29	0.25	9	0.40
Sokolov 2002		15	0.60	57	0.00	19	0.09	14	0.47	56	0.04	19	0.14
Sztompka 1959		32	0.52	41	0.00	49	0.03	65	0.03	74	0.04	68	0.03
Tomsic 1995		51	0.47	75	0.00	61	0.05	49	0.05	66	0.04	52	0.04
Uninsky 1932		77	0.36	66	0.00	82	0.03	68	0.03	75	0.04	74	0.03
Uninsky 1971		61	0.41	42	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	76	0.04	69	0.03
Wasowski 1980		74	0.36	30	0.00	87	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.05	50	0.04
Zak 1937		52	0.46	85	0.00	63	0.05	46	0.05	87	0.02	65	0.03
Zak 1951		53	0.46	76	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	81	0.03	67	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.10	74	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	22	0.34	47	0.06
Random 2		88	-0.06	86	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	58	0.04	87	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.10	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	76	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).