Pachmann 1927

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.59	5	0.06	9	0.09	19	0.33	51	0.04	23	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		64	0.40	32	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	88	0.02	72	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		72	0.39	84	0.00	69	0.05	60	0.05	86	0.03	61	0.04
Bacha 2000		40	0.49	50	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	51	0.04
Badura 1965		47	0.47	53	0.00	34	0.05	37	0.13	65	0.04	40	0.07
Barbosa 1983		46	0.47	44	0.00	27	0.07	25	0.21	52	0.06	22	0.11
Biret 1990		42	0.48	70	0.00	64	0.04	74	0.04	84	0.03	84	0.03
Blet 2003		19	0.56	25	0.01	36	0.04	32	0.17	77	0.03	38	0.07
Block 1995		45	0.47	80	0.00	59	0.05	48	0.05	60	0.04	60	0.04
Blumental 1952		83	0.25	90	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.03	81	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		5	0.60	6	0.05	4	0.18	6	0.51	35	0.17	3	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.59	22	0.01	38	0.04	36	0.13	52	0.05	31	0.08
Bunin 1987		27	0.52	9	0.03	20	0.07	14	0.35	38	0.19	5	0.26
Bunin 1987b		31	0.51	15	0.01	21	0.11	16	0.35	40	0.16	8	0.24
Chiu 1999		17	0.58	2	0.12	3	0.19	5	0.53	24	0.30	1	0.40
Cohen 1997		76	0.36	10	0.02	40	0.04	42	0.10	27	0.21	15	0.14
Cortot 1951		80	0.30	75	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02
Csalog 1996		48	0.46	21	0.01	50	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05	49	0.05
Czerny 1949		56	0.43	89	0.00	72	0.04	65	0.04	86	0.03	77	0.03
Czerny 1990		33	0.50	74	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	81	0.03	62	0.04
Duchoud 2007		75	0.37	81	0.00	73	0.04	67	0.04	83	0.03	78	0.03
Ezaki 2006		25	0.53	88	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	86	0.03	50	0.04
Falvay 1989		3	0.61	42	0.00	15	0.07	8	0.42	43	0.12	9	0.22
Farrell 1958		39	0.49	54	0.00	42	0.04	41	0.10	79	0.03	47	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.43	82	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03
Fliere 1977		2	0.64	4	0.09	2	0.24	2	0.66	55	0.04	14	0.16
Fou 1978		1	0.66	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.67	32	0.21	2	0.38
Francois 1956		20	0.55	19	0.01	26	0.07	23	0.27	66	0.03	29	0.09
Friedman 1923		87	0.20	86	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		86	0.20	85	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	82	0.03
Friedman 1930		81	0.30	33	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03
Garcia 2007		78	0.35	77	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.04	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	0.24	36	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Gierzod 1998		35	0.50	37	0.00	32	0.05	34	0.13	77	0.03	45	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.54	35	0.00	47	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.03	83	0.03
Groot 1988		14	0.58	76	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.38	42	0.10	10	0.19
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.51	38	0.00	23	0.06	21	0.29	86	0.02	35	0.08
Hatto 1993		79	0.34	87	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.18	72	0.04	34	0.08
Hatto 1997		63	0.40	11	0.02	14	0.08	24	0.23	65	0.04	25	0.10
Horowitz 1949		36	0.49	24	0.01	33	0.05	39	0.11	53	0.05	37	0.07
Indjic 1988		70	0.39	79	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.21	70	0.04	28	0.09
Kapell 1951		54	0.44	66	0.00	70	0.06	45	0.06	70	0.04	48	0.05
Kissin 1993		11	0.59	29	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.40	71	0.03	21	0.11
Kushner 1989		26	0.52	60	0.00	45	0.04	69	0.04	71	0.04	55	0.04
Luisada 1991		49	0.46	51	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	79	0.03	36	0.07
Lushtak 2004		8	0.60	3	0.11	7	0.21	7	0.50	38	0.14	4	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.49	61	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	85	0.03	56	0.04
Magaloff 1978		22	0.54	40	0.00	10	0.08	10	0.38	66	0.04	17	0.12
Magin 1975		71	0.39	31	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	80	0.03	70	0.03
Michalowski 1933		82	0.29	45	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	79	0.03	86	0.02
Milkina 1970		12	0.59	18	0.01	12	0.09	11	0.38	73	0.04	18	0.12
Mohovich 1999		7	0.60	68	0.00	16	0.08	15	0.35	76	0.03	26	0.10
Moravec 1969		77	0.35	62	0.00	82	0.04	73	0.04	87	0.02	65	0.03
Morozova 2008		50	0.45	57	0.00	49	0.04	71	0.04	72	0.03	73	0.03
Neighaus 1950		4	0.61	17	0.01	17	0.09	13	0.38	73	0.04	20	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		73	0.38	28	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		41	0.48	39	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.10	70	0.04	43	0.06
Osinska 1989		34	0.50	78	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	74	0.04	52	0.04
Pachmann 1927		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Paderewski 1930		21	0.55	7	0.04	13	0.09	18	0.34	44	0.10	12	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.56	23	0.01	25	0.07	27	0.21	80	0.03	30	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.41	52	0.00	48	0.04	72	0.04	55	0.05	54	0.04
Poblocka 1999		24	0.53	67	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.19	74	0.03	32	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		55	0.44	43	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	84	0.02	71	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		53	0.44	30	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	83	0.03	67	0.03
Rangell 2001		57	0.43	59	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	70	0.03	63	0.04
Richter 1976		29	0.52	16	0.01	22	0.06	26	0.21	55	0.05	24	0.10
Rosen 1989		32	0.51	49	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.13	73	0.03	46	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.39	56	0.00	71	0.06	47	0.06	84	0.02	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		61	0.41	46	0.00	56	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.04	59	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		60	0.42	71	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.11	60	0.04	42	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.40	69	0.00	68	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.03	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		52	0.45	41	0.00	37	0.05	33	0.14	56	0.05	33	0.08
Rossi 2007		85	0.21	48	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.39	14	0.01	51	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.17	27	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.47	20	0.01	24	0.06	22	0.28	38	0.24	6	0.26
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.52	58	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	58	0.05	44	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.49	73	0.00	35	0.05	38	0.12	74	0.04	39	0.07
Shebanova 2002		16	0.58	47	0.00	19	0.09	20	0.31	52	0.05	19	0.12
Smith 1975		43	0.48	64	0.00	46	0.04	75	0.04	86	0.02	68	0.03
Sokolov 2002		68	0.39	63	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	75	0.03	53	0.04
Sztompka 1959		59	0.42	34	0.00	74	0.05	58	0.05	87	0.03	57	0.04
Tomsic 1995		9	0.60	12	0.02	18	0.13	17	0.35	40	0.18	7	0.25
Uninsky 1932		74	0.37	72	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03
Uninsky 1971		51	0.45	26	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	74	0.04	58	0.04
Wasowski 1980		69	0.39	55	0.00	57	0.04	66	0.04	85	0.03	66	0.03
Zak 1937		6	0.60	8	0.04	6	0.28	4	0.56	53	0.06	11	0.18
Zak 1951		15	0.58	13	0.02	5	0.20	3	0.57	59	0.05	13	0.17
Random 1		89	-0.10	65	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	7	0.48	41	0.07
Random 2		88	-0.06	83	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	2	0.57	16	0.13
Random 3		90	-0.13	27	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).