Gierzod 1998

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.74	5	0.07	5	0.12	7	0.53	5	0.54	7	0.53
Anderszewski 2003		29	0.68	15	0.01	35	0.08	28	0.29	13	0.43	27	0.35
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.72	30	0.00	13	0.09	8	0.52	7	0.51	10	0.51
Bacha 2000		50	0.60	26	0.00	31	0.06	43	0.13	15	0.36	39	0.22
Badura 1965		57	0.59	41	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	19	0.37	47	0.14
Barbosa 1983		83	0.46	47	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.04	88	0.03
Biret 1990		27	0.68	85	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.20	30	0.25	41	0.22
Blet 2003		39	0.64	71	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	38	0.13	67	0.07
Block 1995		76	0.51	58	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	47	0.05	83	0.04
Blumental 1952		66	0.56	38	0.00	30	0.07	38	0.16	10	0.34	38	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		19	0.71	8	0.03	29	0.07	29	0.28	4	0.58	22	0.40
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.57	84	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	55	0.05	76	0.04
Bunin 1987		70	0.54	74	0.00	72	0.03	72	0.03	44	0.11	72	0.06
Bunin 1987b		71	0.53	75	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.06	79	0.04
Chiu 1999		81	0.47	82	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	51	0.05	77	0.04
Cohen 1997		86	0.39	79	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	33	0.14	71	0.06
Cortot 1951		38	0.64	51	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	25	0.30	55	0.12
Csalog 1996		77	0.51	31	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.12	66	0.07
Czerny 1949		5	0.78	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.66	4	0.62	1	0.64
Czerny 1990		11	0.74	52	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.44	15	0.46	15	0.45
Duchoud 2007		43	0.63	63	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	32	0.28	54	0.12
Ezaki 2006		20	0.71	40	0.00	38	0.06	33	0.24	28	0.30	36	0.27
Falvay 1989		67	0.56	44	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	58	0.06	78	0.04
Farrell 1958		34	0.66	35	0.00	49	0.04	55	0.04	28	0.24	62	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.57	55	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	48	0.06	74	0.05
Fliere 1977		1	0.80	10	0.02	7	0.18	4	0.61	8	0.52	5	0.56
Fou 1978		60	0.58	25	0.01	32	0.07	40	0.15	34	0.16	43	0.15
Francois 1956		28	0.68	66	0.00	36	0.08	32	0.25	14	0.44	29	0.33
Friedman 1923		84	0.46	87	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	17	0.40	52	0.13
Friedman 1923b		82	0.46	77	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	15	0.43	51	0.13
Friedman 1930		56	0.59	36	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.14	8	0.49	37	0.26
Garcia 2007		68	0.55	80	0.00	61	0.05	50	0.05	21	0.36	50	0.13
Garcia 2007b		79	0.49	61	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	7	0.38	56	0.12
Gierzod 1998		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gornostaeva 1994		15	0.72	70	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.14	21	0.34	40	0.22
Groot 1988		58	0.59	42	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	55	0.04	85	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		49	0.61	37	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.32	28	0.31	32	0.31
Hatto 1993		51	0.60	34	0.00	24	0.07	22	0.35	8	0.59	16	0.45
Hatto 1997		42	0.63	28	0.00	17	0.08	20	0.36	8	0.52	19	0.43
Horowitz 1949		46	0.62	78	0.00	63	0.06	45	0.06	18	0.44	42	0.16
Indjic 1988		48	0.61	46	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.34	8	0.57	17	0.44
Kapell 1951		17	0.71	29	0.00	18	0.07	15	0.42	19	0.37	23	0.39
Kissin 1993		16	0.72	2	0.15	2	0.15	9	0.50	10	0.52	9	0.51
Kushner 1989		7	0.75	39	0.00	19	0.07	19	0.36	12	0.46	21	0.41
Luisada 1991		30	0.68	12	0.02	9	0.13	18	0.39	16	0.47	18	0.43
Lushtak 2004		41	0.63	19	0.01	40	0.07	39	0.16	41	0.12	48	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.69	32	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	15	0.38	44	0.14
Magaloff 1978		22	0.70	48	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.24	23	0.32	35	0.28
Magin 1975		36	0.65	22	0.01	27	0.06	31	0.25	12	0.39	31	0.31
Michalowski 1933		55	0.59	76	0.00	37	0.07	30	0.28	12	0.44	26	0.35
Milkina 1970		24	0.69	16	0.01	10	0.11	21	0.35	26	0.32	28	0.33
Mohovich 1999		25	0.68	59	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	33	0.24	61	0.11
Moravec 1969		53	0.59	60	0.00	66	0.04	63	0.04	30	0.32	57	0.11
Morozova 2008		52	0.60	72	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	34	0.18	45	0.14
Neighaus 1950		4	0.78	24	0.01	6	0.14	2	0.63	2	0.60	3	0.61
Niedzielski 1931		33	0.66	14	0.01	20	0.07	27	0.30	4	0.55	20	0.41
Ohlsson 1999		2	0.79	3	0.12	4	0.13	3	0.62	3	0.61	2	0.61
Osinska 1989		8	0.75	23	0.01	15	0.09	16	0.41	10	0.50	13	0.45
Pachmann 1927		78	0.50	50	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	34	0.13	70	0.06
Paderewski 1930		35	0.65	17	0.01	47	0.04	56	0.04	10	0.38	53	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.59	65	0.00	56	0.03	80	0.03	55	0.04	86	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.57	68	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	31	0.32	59	0.11
Poblocka 1999		6	0.77	4	0.07	8	0.21	6	0.55	3	0.56	6	0.55
Rabcewiczowa 1932		40	0.64	49	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	23	0.31	60	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		59	0.58	56	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	44	0.10	68	0.06
Rangell 2001		72	0.53	54	0.00	65	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.05	84	0.04
Richter 1976		75	0.52	83	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	54	0.05	80	0.04
Rosen 1989		9	0.75	20	0.01	14	0.12	10	0.50	7	0.55	8	0.52
Rosenthal 1930		37	0.64	89	0.00	60	0.05	53	0.05	16	0.40	46	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		74	0.52	53	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	35	0.16	65	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.53	43	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	31	0.20	63	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.62	62	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.42	49	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		69	0.54	81	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	33	0.17	73	0.06
Rossi 2007		87	0.33	73	0.00	87	0.04	67	0.04	78	0.03	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.45	45	0.00	86	0.04	71	0.04	44	0.11	64	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.49	67	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.09	75	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		65	0.57	33	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	54	0.05	81	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		12	0.74	21	0.01	16	0.10	11	0.46	5	0.53	11	0.49
Shebanova 2002		3	0.79	6	0.06	3	0.16	5	0.59	4	0.61	4	0.60
Smith 1975		18	0.71	57	0.00	34	0.09	26	0.31	25	0.27	33	0.29
Sokolov 2002		26	0.68	9	0.02	41	0.09	36	0.20	24	0.38	34	0.28
Sztompka 1959		10	0.74	7	0.05	11	0.09	12	0.45	11	0.51	12	0.48
Tomsic 1995		63	0.57	64	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	41	0.14	69	0.06
Uninsky 1932		47	0.62	27	0.00	22	0.07	35	0.23	18	0.45	30	0.32
Uninsky 1971		32	0.66	11	0.02	21	0.08	24	0.33	15	0.44	25	0.38
Wasowski 1980		45	0.62	69	0.00	51	0.06	46	0.06	26	0.20	58	0.11
Zak 1937		21	0.70	18	0.01	26	0.09	13	0.45	14	0.45	14	0.45
Zak 1951		31	0.67	13	0.02	25	0.07	17	0.40	17	0.36	24	0.38
Random 1		90	-0.14	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.07	86	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	43	0.08	82	0.04
Random 3		88	0.00	88	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	51	0.05	89	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).