Neighaus 1950

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.75	9	0.03	7	0.14	6	0.53	7	0.52	8	0.52
Anderszewski 2003		45	0.63	71	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	24	0.25	64	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		23	0.69	10	0.03	11	0.08	11	0.43	8	0.51	13	0.47
Bacha 2000		48	0.63	69	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	23	0.32	61	0.11
Badura 1965		65	0.58	79	0.00	60	0.05	52	0.05	24	0.35	58	0.13
Barbosa 1983		75	0.50	52	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	24	0.26	67	0.10
Biret 1990		29	0.68	57	0.00	52	0.04	71	0.04	25	0.27	69	0.10
Blet 2003		40	0.64	72	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	21	0.32	56	0.13
Block 1995		56	0.60	38	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.16	6	0.45	35	0.27
Blumental 1952		78	0.46	48	0.00	75	0.05	56	0.05	53	0.04	79	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.76	15	0.02	6	0.13	5	0.57	1	0.68	2	0.62
Brailowsky 1960		39	0.64	54	0.00	72	0.05	53	0.05	34	0.24	62	0.11
Bunin 1987		38	0.64	16	0.01	46	0.09	45	0.09	10	0.50	41	0.21
Bunin 1987b		41	0.64	43	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	10	0.51	48	0.17
Chiu 1999		58	0.59	31	0.00	50	0.05	61	0.05	14	0.47	51	0.15
Cohen 1997		87	0.30	81	0.00	87	0.04	75	0.04	81	0.03	85	0.03
Cortot 1951		46	0.63	80	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	30	0.26	70	0.10
Csalog 1996		85	0.36	47	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	88	0.02
Czerny 1949		13	0.73	2	0.07	8	0.19	9	0.50	6	0.59	6	0.54
Czerny 1990		24	0.69	73	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.24	20	0.32	34	0.28
Duchoud 2007		44	0.63	82	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.09	17	0.38	47	0.18
Ezaki 2006		10	0.73	58	0.00	26	0.07	23	0.32	14	0.39	26	0.35
Falvay 1989		70	0.55	62	0.00	77	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.06	75	0.05
Farrell 1958		19	0.71	30	0.00	30	0.07	34	0.20	3	0.52	29	0.32
Ferenczy 1958		67	0.56	33	0.00	74	0.04	69	0.04	39	0.11	74	0.07
Fliere 1977		1	0.82	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.70	1	0.64	1	0.67
Fou 1978		34	0.66	7	0.04	14	0.08	21	0.32	19	0.38	28	0.35
Francois 1956		16	0.71	21	0.01	22	0.07	20	0.33	7	0.55	16	0.43
Friedman 1923		74	0.54	41	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	9	0.53	52	0.15
Friedman 1923b		72	0.54	63	0.00	49	0.05	60	0.05	8	0.54	50	0.16
Friedman 1930		49	0.62	32	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.11	4	0.55	38	0.25
Garcia 2007		69	0.56	50	0.00	66	0.04	79	0.04	13	0.43	57	0.13
Garcia 2007b		71	0.54	46	0.00	58	0.07	47	0.07	3	0.54	46	0.19
Gierzod 1998		2	0.78	14	0.02	2	0.10	2	0.60	2	0.63	5	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.73	34	0.00	27	0.09	17	0.34	5	0.56	15	0.44
Groot 1988		14	0.72	65	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.30	10	0.52	22	0.39
Harasiewicz 1955		32	0.67	3	0.06	3	0.12	7	0.51	2	0.51	10	0.51
Hatto 1993		68	0.56	56	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	10	0.49	49	0.17
Hatto 1997		54	0.61	66	0.00	41	0.05	38	0.15	11	0.46	37	0.26
Horowitz 1949		21	0.70	40	0.00	33	0.06	29	0.27	7	0.59	19	0.40
Indjic 1988		64	0.58	78	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	11	0.49	45	0.19
Kapell 1951		43	0.63	68	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	33	0.20	65	0.10
Kissin 1993		27	0.68	26	0.00	32	0.06	28	0.27	17	0.39	31	0.32
Kushner 1989		22	0.70	61	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.20	24	0.33	36	0.26
Luisada 1991		37	0.65	36	0.00	36	0.05	35	0.20	26	0.38	33	0.28
Lushtak 2004		17	0.71	8	0.04	13	0.07	15	0.35	9	0.42	23	0.38
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.71	29	0.00	19	0.06	26	0.28	4	0.55	21	0.39
Magaloff 1978		26	0.69	25	0.00	35	0.04	39	0.14	25	0.30	42	0.20
Magin 1975		52	0.61	75	0.00	37	0.05	37	0.16	14	0.33	40	0.23
Michalowski 1933		62	0.59	27	0.00	21	0.07	33	0.20	5	0.52	30	0.32
Milkina 1970		36	0.66	53	0.00	59	0.08	46	0.08	45	0.08	73	0.08
Mohovich 1999		8	0.74	59	0.00	25	0.07	18	0.34	15	0.49	18	0.41
Moravec 1969		81	0.43	83	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	49	0.05	77	0.04
Morozova 2008		51	0.62	24	0.01	40	0.05	41	0.12	14	0.34	43	0.20
Neighaus 1950		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.59	17	0.01	63	0.04	76	0.04	15	0.40	54	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.78	13	0.02	9	0.14	8	0.50	6	0.54	7	0.52
Osinska 1989		20	0.70	23	0.01	28	0.07	27	0.28	16	0.44	27	0.35
Pachmann 1927		55	0.61	55	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	13	0.38	59	0.12
Paderewski 1930		47	0.63	45	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	20	0.31	63	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.67	49	0.00	20	0.07	22	0.32	9	0.47	20	0.39
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.59	77	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	13	0.44	53	0.13
Poblocka 1999		28	0.68	6	0.04	10	0.13	19	0.34	12	0.41	24	0.37
Rabcewiczowa 1932		57	0.60	44	0.00	68	0.04	78	0.04	35	0.19	72	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		35	0.66	28	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.21	12	0.43	32	0.30
Rangell 2001		66	0.58	39	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	22	0.34	60	0.12
Richter 1976		73	0.54	42	0.00	70	0.05	62	0.05	19	0.33	55	0.13
Rosen 1989		11	0.73	18	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.42	9	0.54	11	0.48
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.50	76	0.00	76	0.05	51	0.05	53	0.04	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.43	86	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.44	84	0.00	79	0.04	80	0.04	45	0.07	76	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.49	70	0.00	78	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.45	87	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.05	81	0.04
Rossi 2007		86	0.35	89	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.38	60	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.41	64	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	53	0.06	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		60	0.59	67	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	33	0.24	68	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.68	19	0.01	18	0.07	14	0.40	8	0.50	14	0.45
Shebanova 2002		7	0.75	11	0.02	15	0.07	10	0.43	6	0.61	9	0.51
Smith 1975		25	0.69	51	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.30	13	0.46	25	0.37
Sokolov 2002		33	0.66	35	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	27	0.35	44	0.19
Sztompka 1959		5	0.76	20	0.01	12	0.07	12	0.43	10	0.52	12	0.47
Tomsic 1995		50	0.62	37	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	33	0.25	66	0.10
Uninsky 1932		53	0.61	74	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.12	14	0.49	39	0.24
Uninsky 1971		42	0.63	12	0.02	17	0.07	16	0.34	8	0.51	17	0.42
Wasowski 1980		63	0.59	22	0.01	54	0.05	57	0.05	28	0.18	71	0.09
Zak 1937		12	0.73	4	0.06	5	0.13	4	0.58	2	0.64	3	0.61
Zak 1951		15	0.71	5	0.05	4	0.11	3	0.59	4	0.63	4	0.61
Random 1		90	-0.15	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	56	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.12	90	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	70	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	85	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	36	0.15	80	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).