Gornostaeva 1994

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.69	4	0.05	6	0.09	15	0.44	33	0.26	22	0.34
Anderszewski 2003		25	0.65	23	0.01	33	0.08	31	0.26	22	0.28	26	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		56	0.55	74	0.00	54	0.05	46	0.05	75	0.03	68	0.04
Bacha 2000		54	0.55	25	0.01	55	0.04	59	0.04	41	0.16	47	0.08
Badura 1965		64	0.53	69	0.00	61	0.03	65	0.03	40	0.16	53	0.07
Barbosa 1983		75	0.47	37	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	34	0.20	39	0.13
Biret 1990		24	0.65	42	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.16	67	0.05	46	0.09
Blet 2003		45	0.60	28	0.01	50	0.06	45	0.06	39	0.12	50	0.08
Block 1995		32	0.64	66	0.00	27	0.07	30	0.27	22	0.31	25	0.29
Blumental 1952		82	0.38	40	0.00	71	0.03	67	0.03	61	0.04	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.72	33	0.00	18	0.07	23	0.31	16	0.41	19	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.67	36	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.14	29	0.29	34	0.20
Bunin 1987		70	0.50	76	0.00	66	0.02	83	0.02	46	0.06	86	0.03
Bunin 1987b		72	0.49	67	0.00	67	0.04	57	0.04	46	0.06	57	0.05
Chiu 1999		76	0.47	55	0.00	68	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.04	73	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.28	64	0.00	87	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04	69	0.04
Cortot 1951		53	0.56	63	0.00	73	0.02	84	0.02	69	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		79	0.42	65	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	62	0.04	80	0.03
Czerny 1949		17	0.68	12	0.01	16	0.11	20	0.36	39	0.15	29	0.23
Czerny 1990		13	0.71	51	0.00	29	0.09	13	0.46	36	0.16	27	0.27
Duchoud 2007		50	0.57	22	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.10	36	0.17	41	0.13
Ezaki 2006		11	0.72	48	0.00	14	0.09	6	0.53	20	0.34	13	0.42
Falvay 1989		37	0.63	8	0.02	34	0.07	40	0.14	35	0.28	35	0.20
Farrell 1958		40	0.61	78	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	46	0.06	56	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.54	49	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.04	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		6	0.76	10	0.02	11	0.10	3	0.59	36	0.24	18	0.38
Fou 1978		39	0.61	6	0.03	8	0.09	11	0.50	23	0.33	14	0.41
Francois 1956		14	0.71	5	0.04	9	0.10	12	0.48	11	0.49	9	0.48
Friedman 1923		83	0.37	81	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	35	0.22	52	0.08
Friedman 1923b		84	0.37	86	0.00	75	0.04	62	0.04	37	0.22	45	0.09
Friedman 1930		60	0.54	71	0.00	48	0.04	56	0.04	18	0.41	40	0.13
Garcia 2007		73	0.49	83	0.00	70	0.02	87	0.02	63	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007b		77	0.45	54	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	53	0.05	70	0.04
Gierzod 1998		12	0.72	57	0.00	30	0.11	21	0.34	42	0.14	32	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Groot 1988		30	0.65	31	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.45	29	0.37	15	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		48	0.59	58	0.00	22	0.07	26	0.29	39	0.12	37	0.19
Hatto 1993		86	0.33	89	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	71	0.04	87	0.03
Hatto 1997		80	0.39	82	0.00	80	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.04	82	0.03
Horowitz 1949		59	0.54	85	0.00	79	0.03	69	0.03	60	0.04	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		85	0.35	90	0.00	84	0.03	63	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03
Kapell 1951		46	0.60	44	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.04	61	0.04
Kissin 1993		26	0.65	11	0.01	19	0.07	28	0.28	37	0.15	36	0.20
Kushner 1989		5	0.76	29	0.01	7	0.09	7	0.53	19	0.44	7	0.48
Luisada 1991		35	0.63	59	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.19	43	0.08	42	0.12
Lushtak 2004		71	0.50	79	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.04	67	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.77	20	0.01	3	0.23	10	0.51	6	0.49	6	0.50
Magaloff 1978		7	0.74	14	0.01	12	0.10	8	0.53	5	0.49	3	0.51
Magin 1975		21	0.66	27	0.01	17	0.07	16	0.39	20	0.29	21	0.34
Michalowski 1933		68	0.53	45	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.08	54	0.06
Milkina 1970		15	0.70	53	0.00	13	0.08	19	0.38	23	0.33	20	0.35
Mohovich 1999		9	0.73	3	0.08	4	0.15	9	0.53	20	0.43	8	0.48
Moravec 1969		61	0.54	46	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Morozova 2008		52	0.56	41	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	66	0.04	64	0.04
Neighaus 1950		8	0.73	21	0.01	5	0.10	5	0.56	17	0.34	11	0.44
Niedzielski 1931		49	0.57	80	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	65	0.03	74	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.65	15	0.01	38	0.06	36	0.17	62	0.04	49	0.08
Osinska 1989		4	0.77	13	0.01	10	0.11	4	0.57	14	0.44	5	0.50
Pachmann 1927		62	0.54	52	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Paderewski 1930		44	0.60	73	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	48	0.04	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.61	18	0.01	26	0.06	33	0.24	30	0.17	33	0.20
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.57	61	0.00	63	0.03	70	0.03	50	0.06	59	0.04
Poblocka 1999		42	0.60	75	0.00	64	0.03	66	0.03	65	0.04	72	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		27	0.65	26	0.01	37	0.06	37	0.16	22	0.31	30	0.22
Rachmaninoff 1923		47	0.59	30	0.01	35	0.07	34	0.20	38	0.13	38	0.16
Rangell 2001		34	0.64	56	0.00	21	0.06	27	0.29	18	0.37	24	0.33
Richter 1976		74	0.47	77	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	67	0.04	77	0.03
Rosen 1989		1	0.78	1	0.34	1	0.34	2	0.70	1	0.64	1	0.67
Rosenthal 1930		18	0.67	9	0.02	31	0.09	24	0.30	6	0.62	12	0.43
Rosenthal 1931		31	0.65	50	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.32	7	0.61	10	0.44
Rosenthal 1931b		36	0.63	39	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.29	7	0.54	16	0.40
Rosenthal 1931c		19	0.67	38	0.00	24	0.12	17	0.39	5	0.67	4	0.51
Rosenthal 1931d		23	0.66	43	0.00	32	0.11	32	0.26	14	0.45	23	0.34
Rossi 2007		69	0.52	62	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.11	5	0.49	28	0.23
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.38	32	0.00	72	0.03	72	0.03	50	0.05	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.45	19	0.01	59	0.03	73	0.03	44	0.11	55	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		57	0.54	35	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	42	0.15	44	0.09
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.53	72	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Shebanova 2002		33	0.64	68	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	81	0.03	66	0.04
Smith 1975		2	0.78	2	0.13	2	0.26	1	0.71	2	0.61	2	0.66
Sokolov 2002		29	0.65	7	0.03	28	0.08	18	0.38	19	0.40	17	0.39
Sztompka 1959		22	0.66	16	0.01	20	0.06	29	0.27	40	0.18	31	0.22
Tomsic 1995		38	0.61	47	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	29	0.30	43	0.12
Uninsky 1932		65	0.53	24	0.01	69	0.03	68	0.03	53	0.06	65	0.04
Uninsky 1971		67	0.53	60	0.00	76	0.03	64	0.03	64	0.05	63	0.04
Wasowski 1980		43	0.60	17	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.10	48	0.06	48	0.08
Zak 1937		55	0.55	70	0.00	60	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.04	75	0.03
Zak 1951		63	0.54	34	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.05	58	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.13	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	63	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.20	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.01	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	14	0.36	51	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).