Paderewski 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		23	0.62	62	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.20	68	0.03	43	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		38	0.57	12	0.02	28	0.05	35	0.15	77	0.03	45	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.59	80	0.00	39	0.05	31	0.18	77	0.03	49	0.07
Bacha 2000		58	0.51	87	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	66	0.04	73	0.03
Badura 1965		53	0.52	30	0.01	54	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04	65	0.04
Barbosa 1983		85	0.37	73	0.00	64	0.03	67	0.03	61	0.05	62	0.04
Biret 1990		22	0.62	45	0.00	31	0.06	24	0.24	49	0.06	26	0.12
Blet 2003		18	0.63	2	0.12	2	0.13	3	0.46	20	0.33	5	0.39
Block 1995		55	0.52	32	0.00	50	0.04	53	0.04	40	0.11	47	0.07
Blumental 1952		35	0.58	5	0.05	6	0.08	16	0.33	7	0.37	9	0.35
Boshniakovich 1969		5	0.69	20	0.01	10	0.07	14	0.34	26	0.28	12	0.31
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.53	54	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	84	0.03	85	0.02
Bunin 1987		64	0.49	22	0.01	70	0.04	50	0.04	55	0.05	66	0.04
Bunin 1987b		67	0.49	36	0.00	69	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.05	59	0.04
Chiu 1999		80	0.43	38	0.00	68	0.03	76	0.03	60	0.04	77	0.03
Cohen 1997		76	0.45	76	0.00	58	0.03	64	0.03	12	0.38	30	0.11
Cortot 1951		14	0.64	43	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.31	28	0.28	13	0.29
Csalog 1996		69	0.48	82	0.00	74	0.02	82	0.02	45	0.07	63	0.04
Czerny 1949		36	0.58	8	0.04	38	0.06	38	0.12	55	0.05	42	0.08
Czerny 1990		4	0.69	31	0.00	11	0.07	11	0.37	52	0.05	22	0.14
Duchoud 2007		71	0.47	86	0.00	79	0.02	88	0.02	67	0.04	82	0.03
Ezaki 2006		32	0.60	90	0.00	53	0.03	69	0.03	60	0.04	72	0.03
Falvay 1989		42	0.56	74	0.00	67	0.03	77	0.03	59	0.05	55	0.04
Farrell 1958		24	0.61	9	0.03	14	0.08	5	0.44	8	0.43	1	0.43
Ferenczy 1958		13	0.64	59	0.00	32	0.06	15	0.33	21	0.29	11	0.31
Fliere 1977		7	0.66	17	0.01	21	0.07	13	0.35	84	0.03	32	0.10
Fou 1978		34	0.58	28	0.01	26	0.05	30	0.19	75	0.04	37	0.09
Francois 1956		8	0.66	6	0.05	7	0.07	12	0.37	29	0.30	10	0.33
Friedman 1923		86	0.32	78	0.00	62	0.03	65	0.03	61	0.05	71	0.04
Friedman 1923b		87	0.32	56	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	74	0.04	67	0.04
Friedman 1930		62	0.50	15	0.02	25	0.05	27	0.20	27	0.30	14	0.24
Garcia 2007		68	0.48	55	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	45	0.06	52	0.05
Garcia 2007b		83	0.38	63	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.11	44	0.09	35	0.10
Gierzod 1998		11	0.65	23	0.01	13	0.07	10	0.38	56	0.04	25	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.60	51	0.00	46	0.04	48	0.04	58	0.04	68	0.04
Groot 1988		30	0.60	58	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	71	0.04	53	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.51	69	0.00	41	0.05	37	0.13	80	0.03	50	0.06
Hatto 1993		82	0.42	66	0.00	30	0.06	40	0.11	49	0.06	44	0.08
Hatto 1997		72	0.47	24	0.01	16	0.07	34	0.16	47	0.07	29	0.11
Horowitz 1949		73	0.46	35	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Indjic 1988		77	0.44	75	0.00	29	0.05	39	0.12	56	0.05	40	0.08
Kapell 1951		1	0.70	1	0.14	1	0.14	2	0.49	28	0.28	7	0.37
Kissin 1993		15	0.64	21	0.01	36	0.05	25	0.22	46	0.06	28	0.11
Kushner 1989		10	0.65	42	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.31	55	0.05	24	0.12
Luisada 1991		57	0.51	77	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	75	0.03	74	0.03
Lushtak 2004		26	0.61	27	0.01	9	0.08	8	0.39	53	0.05	21	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.61	37	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	37	0.13	27	0.11
Magaloff 1978		12	0.65	13	0.02	24	0.05	21	0.30	43	0.13	17	0.20
Magin 1975		65	0.49	33	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Michalowski 1933		31	0.60	65	0.00	12	0.07	9	0.39	18	0.40	4	0.39
Milkina 1970		27	0.61	52	0.00	45	0.04	49	0.04	71	0.04	58	0.04
Mohovich 1999		20	0.62	50	0.00	42	0.05	36	0.13	62	0.04	48	0.07
Moravec 1969		47	0.55	46	0.00	59	0.03	68	0.03	41	0.20	38	0.08
Morozova 2008		63	0.50	57	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Neighaus 1950		19	0.63	29	0.01	23	0.08	20	0.31	77	0.04	31	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.52	19	0.01	60	0.04	54	0.04	70	0.03	78	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.58	39	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04
Osinska 1989		2	0.69	10	0.03	4	0.08	4	0.44	28	0.31	6	0.37
Pachmann 1927		48	0.55	11	0.03	27	0.06	44	0.10	18	0.34	19	0.18
Paderewski 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.60	26	0.01	40	0.06	33	0.17	51	0.05	36	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		54	0.52	40	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	37	0.17	39	0.08
Poblocka 1999		9	0.66	4	0.05	5	0.10	6	0.43	22	0.28	8	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		3	0.69	70	0.00	8	0.08	7	0.40	13	0.42	2	0.41
Rachmaninoff 1923		75	0.46	68	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02
Rangell 2001		41	0.57	7	0.04	17	0.06	26	0.21	31	0.26	15	0.23
Richter 1976		74	0.46	34	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	66	0.04	80	0.03
Rosen 1989		21	0.62	81	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.25	39	0.15	18	0.19
Rosenthal 1930		49	0.54	83	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	47	0.05	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.43	61	0.00	86	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.44	84	0.00	85	0.03	73	0.03	56	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		43	0.56	18	0.01	47	0.05	47	0.05	36	0.19	34	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.47	89	0.00	84	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	69	0.04
Rossi 2007		79	0.43	49	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	49	0.06	54	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.38	47	0.00	87	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.05	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		60	0.51	67	0.00	76	0.03	66	0.03	51	0.06	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.56	60	0.00	49	0.05	46	0.05	48	0.06	51	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		40	0.57	16	0.02	37	0.05	32	0.18	69	0.04	41	0.08
Shebanova 2002		17	0.63	14	0.02	18	0.08	22	0.29	38	0.16	16	0.22
Smith 1975		16	0.63	41	0.00	15	0.08	17	0.33	45	0.05	23	0.13
Sokolov 2002		51	0.54	48	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03
Sztompka 1959		6	0.68	3	0.12	3	0.14	1	0.51	23	0.33	3	0.41
Tomsic 1995		46	0.55	53	0.00	57	0.04	52	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.04
Uninsky 1932		50	0.54	44	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.11	65	0.05	46	0.07
Uninsky 1971		39	0.57	25	0.01	34	0.06	29	0.19	43	0.11	20	0.14
Wasowski 1980		45	0.55	72	0.00	55	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.04	75	0.03
Zak 1937		61	0.50	85	0.00	77	0.04	56	0.04	74	0.04	57	0.04
Zak 1951		66	0.49	71	0.00	73	0.03	70	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.22	79	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.01	64	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	7	0.47	33	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.05	88	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	55	0.05	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).