Hatto 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.56	62	0.00	28	0.06	23	0.26	42	0.11	33	0.17
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.71	72	0.00	3	0.24	7	0.53	2	0.55	4	0.54
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.73	38	0.00	5	0.19	3	0.58	5	0.52	3	0.55
Bacha 2000		30	0.56	20	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	37	0.17	47	0.09
Badura 1965		48	0.50	32	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.34	40	0.12
Barbosa 1983		54	0.49	82	0.00	64	0.08	45	0.08	38	0.17	38	0.12
Biret 1990		13	0.61	4	0.00	24	0.07	17	0.32	32	0.24	18	0.28
Blet 2003		15	0.61	76	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.28	24	0.29	17	0.28
Block 1995		84	0.29	12	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Blumental 1952		37	0.54	40	0.00	56	0.04	71	0.04	28	0.17	57	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.47	21	0.00	50	0.04	75	0.04	34	0.19	50	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.47	73	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	48	0.05	70	0.04
Bunin 1987		43	0.52	22	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	32	0.29	42	0.12
Bunin 1987b		45	0.51	47	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	32	0.31	36	0.12
Chiu 1999		32	0.55	63	0.00	53	0.04	72	0.04	32	0.21	48	0.09
Cohen 1997		67	0.43	71	0.00	75	0.04	61	0.04	28	0.20	51	0.09
Cortot 1951		47	0.50	77	0.00	62	0.07	48	0.07	44	0.10	58	0.08
Csalog 1996		78	0.31	49	0.00	66	0.05	58	0.05	34	0.17	49	0.09
Czerny 1949		42	0.52	18	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.22	37	0.16	30	0.19
Czerny 1990		29	0.56	8	0.00	35	0.05	41	0.11	76	0.03	63	0.06
Duchoud 2007		17	0.60	64	0.00	16	0.08	19	0.31	12	0.40	12	0.35
Ezaki 2006		11	0.63	26	0.00	23	0.05	21	0.28	46	0.06	35	0.13
Falvay 1989		77	0.33	39	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.04	76	0.03
Farrell 1958		22	0.58	67	0.00	54	0.03	79	0.03	56	0.05	71	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		33	0.55	24	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.14	19	0.30	28	0.20
Fliere 1977		8	0.65	65	0.00	8	0.17	9	0.50	31	0.29	11	0.38
Fou 1978		40	0.53	41	0.00	39	0.04	32	0.17	62	0.04	54	0.08
Francois 1956		72	0.39	51	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.03	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		21	0.58	88	0.00	27	0.07	29	0.21	21	0.34	20	0.27
Friedman 1923b		19	0.58	87	0.00	26	0.07	28	0.21	20	0.36	19	0.27
Friedman 1930		20	0.58	56	0.00	15	0.09	24	0.25	11	0.47	13	0.34
Garcia 2007		49	0.50	83	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	42	0.10	59	0.07
Garcia 2007b		62	0.45	42	0.00	55	0.03	78	0.03	41	0.10	68	0.05
Gierzod 1998		10	0.63	35	0.00	13	0.14	8	0.52	20	0.36	9	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		73	0.39	60	0.00	73	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.03	84	0.03
Groot 1988		69	0.41	57	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		46	0.51	36	0.00	20	0.07	30	0.21	37	0.16	31	0.18
Hatto 1993		2	0.98	2	0.03	2	0.94	2	0.97	2	0.98	2	0.97
Hatto 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Horowitz 1949		50	0.50	84	0.00	40	0.06	34	0.14	35	0.31	27	0.21
Indjic 1988		1	0.99	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.98	2	0.99	1	0.98
Kapell 1951		25	0.57	52	0.00	12	0.12	13	0.40	27	0.28	14	0.33
Kissin 1993		58	0.47	50	0.00	43	0.05	39	0.11	49	0.06	56	0.08
Kushner 1989		41	0.53	13	0.00	61	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.05	67	0.05
Luisada 1991		5	0.70	33	0.00	6	0.17	6	0.53	13	0.48	5	0.50
Lushtak 2004		7	0.67	7	0.00	14	0.16	14	0.39	23	0.25	15	0.31
Malcuzynski 1961		74	0.38	5	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	51	0.04	62	0.06
Magaloff 1978		64	0.44	6	0.00	41	0.05	37	0.13	57	0.05	53	0.08
Magin 1975		26	0.56	37	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.31	27	0.22	21	0.26
Michalowski 1933		66	0.43	53	0.00	30	0.07	25	0.23	29	0.30	22	0.26
Milkina 1970		59	0.47	43	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	64	0.05	72	0.04
Mohovich 1999		52	0.49	44	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.11	60	0.07
Moravec 1969		76	0.33	45	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03
Morozova 2008		9	0.64	48	0.00	7	0.12	22	0.27	24	0.24	24	0.25
Neighaus 1950		14	0.61	54	0.00	19	0.07	11	0.46	38	0.15	23	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.44	9	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.11	28	0.25	32	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.69	34	0.00	4	0.14	4	0.57	10	0.44	6	0.50
Osinska 1989		55	0.49	16	0.00	63	0.08	46	0.08	67	0.04	61	0.06
Pachmann 1927		70	0.40	58	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	24	0.23	46	0.10
Paderewski 1930		60	0.47	78	0.00	65	0.07	47	0.07	34	0.16	44	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		61	0.45	85	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	76	0.03	69	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.30	27	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		24	0.57	59	0.00	9	0.12	10	0.47	19	0.33	10	0.39
Rabcewiczowa 1932		68	0.42	28	0.00	67	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.04	66	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		39	0.53	79	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	45	0.06	65	0.05
Rangell 2001		86	0.26	29	0.00	80	0.04	66	0.04	43	0.10	64	0.06
Richter 1976		63	0.45	11	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	21	0.31	37	0.12
Rosen 1989		51	0.50	55	0.00	42	0.05	38	0.12	41	0.12	41	0.12
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.39	70	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.29	66	0.00	86	0.04	74	0.04	87	0.02	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.30	74	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.31	19	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.28	3	0.00	84	0.03	87	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.18	68	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	76	0.04	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		23	0.58	25	0.00	21	0.06	44	0.09	28	0.29	34	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.30	75	0.00	81	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.05	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.62	89	0.00	45	0.05	56	0.05	34	0.24	45	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		16	0.60	10	0.00	10	0.10	5	0.53	21	0.42	7	0.47
Shebanova 2002		36	0.54	30	0.00	29	0.06	27	0.22	30	0.26	25	0.24
Smith 1975		44	0.51	46	0.00	51	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.03	77	0.03
Sokolov 2002		35	0.54	17	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.16	65	0.04	52	0.08
Sztompka 1959		31	0.55	61	0.00	37	0.05	42	0.10	57	0.06	55	0.08
Tomsic 1995		75	0.38	15	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	76	0.03	79	0.03
Uninsky 1932		53	0.49	80	0.00	33	0.05	31	0.18	33	0.23	29	0.20
Uninsky 1971		38	0.53	90	0.00	11	0.11	12	0.45	11	0.47	8	0.46
Wasowski 1980		34	0.54	14	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.13	41	0.09	43	0.11
Zak 1937		18	0.59	23	0.00	22	0.06	15	0.35	30	0.24	16	0.29
Zak 1951		28	0.56	31	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.34	33	0.16	26	0.23
Random 1		90	-0.15	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	55	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.01	81	0.00	88	0.03	88	0.03	6	0.48	39	0.12
Random 3		89	0.00	69	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	48	0.05	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).