Rossi 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.45	27	0.01	27	0.06	27	0.24	74	0.03	36	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		17	0.48	35	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	82	0.03	61	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.34	32	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	71	0.03	65	0.04
Bacha 2000		55	0.34	34	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	52	0.06	43	0.06
Badura 1965		35	0.42	78	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	88	0.02	80	0.03
Barbosa 1983		46	0.39	17	0.01	23	0.08	26	0.26	81	0.03	29	0.09
Biret 1990		21	0.46	43	0.00	17	0.09	8	0.48	62	0.05	13	0.15
Blet 2003		47	0.38	85	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.17	60	0.04	35	0.08
Block 1995		20	0.47	29	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.23	34	0.17	10	0.20
Blumental 1952		26	0.45	52	0.00	34	0.05	28	0.23	81	0.02	41	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.44	26	0.01	58	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.02	81	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.50	24	0.01	29	0.06	38	0.15	42	0.13	14	0.14
Bunin 1987		83	0.17	73	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Bunin 1987b		86	0.15	79	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.02
Chiu 1999		15	0.48	65	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	84	0.03	68	0.03
Cohen 1997		75	0.25	49	0.00	64	0.03	80	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		37	0.41	2	0.13	2	0.12	22	0.29	31	0.22	5	0.25
Csalog 1996		87	0.13	61	0.00	65	0.04	72	0.04	51	0.05	60	0.04
Czerny 1949		25	0.45	21	0.01	39	0.06	40	0.13	83	0.03	46	0.06
Czerny 1990		4	0.58	3	0.11	3	0.13	1	0.66	56	0.04	12	0.16
Duchoud 2007		77	0.25	37	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Ezaki 2006		1	0.59	9	0.04	6	0.11	4	0.58	83	0.03	18	0.13
Falvay 1989		8	0.50	10	0.04	10	0.10	6	0.49	34	0.28	1	0.37
Farrell 1958		38	0.41	55	0.00	25	0.07	20	0.31	63	0.04	25	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		50	0.37	71	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	81	0.03	63	0.04
Fliere 1977		31	0.43	41	0.00	52	0.06	53	0.06	58	0.04	48	0.05
Fou 1978		29	0.44	75	0.00	30	0.07	35	0.18	82	0.03	39	0.07
Francois 1956		23	0.46	6	0.05	7	0.10	13	0.39	52	0.05	17	0.14
Friedman 1923		70	0.28	80	0.00	69	0.07	45	0.07	65	0.05	47	0.06
Friedman 1923b		71	0.28	63	0.00	68	0.04	60	0.04	73	0.04	66	0.04
Friedman 1930		43	0.40	66	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	58	0.05	62	0.04
Garcia 2007		42	0.40	58	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.04	64	0.04
Garcia 2007b		48	0.38	59	0.00	55	0.06	52	0.06	68	0.04	54	0.05
Gierzod 1998		57	0.33	64	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	67	0.04	77	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.52	14	0.01	13	0.11	5	0.49	41	0.11	8	0.23
Groot 1988		41	0.40	47	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.28	84	0.03	31	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.59	7	0.05	14	0.08	31	0.21	78	0.03	37	0.08
Hatto 1993		85	0.16	77	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Hatto 1997		82	0.18	84	0.00	80	0.04	76	0.04	85	0.03	74	0.03
Horowitz 1949		78	0.24	56	0.00	84	0.04	75	0.04	80	0.03	69	0.03
Indjic 1988		84	0.16	89	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	88	0.02	87	0.02
Kapell 1951		69	0.29	70	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.21	85	0.03	33	0.08
Kissin 1993		24	0.46	42	0.00	41	0.04	42	0.10	72	0.03	49	0.05
Kushner 1989		13	0.49	72	0.00	24	0.08	18	0.32	82	0.03	27	0.10
Luisada 1991		9	0.50	51	0.00	26	0.08	23	0.28	58	0.04	23	0.11
Lushtak 2004		36	0.41	46	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	71	0.03	50	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.40	13	0.01	19	0.06	21	0.30	60	0.04	26	0.11
Magaloff 1978		16	0.48	5	0.06	8	0.09	10	0.45	36	0.18	2	0.28
Magin 1975		40	0.40	31	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	64	0.04	45	0.06
Michalowski 1933		53	0.34	25	0.01	72	0.04	77	0.04	83	0.03	71	0.03
Milkina 1970		34	0.42	18	0.01	16	0.09	15	0.37	61	0.05	15	0.14
Mohovich 1999		19	0.47	23	0.01	12	0.10	7	0.48	80	0.03	21	0.12
Moravec 1969		45	0.39	60	0.00	15	0.07	12	0.39	43	0.17	3	0.26
Morozova 2008		14	0.49	76	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.17	82	0.03	40	0.07
Neighaus 1950		52	0.35	86	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.03	83	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.33	12	0.02	47	0.06	51	0.06	79	0.03	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		65	0.29	44	0.00	74	0.04	68	0.04	83	0.03	70	0.03
Osinska 1989		2	0.59	8	0.04	5	0.17	2	0.61	54	0.05	11	0.17
Pachmann 1927		80	0.21	45	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02
Paderewski 1930		32	0.43	40	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	81	0.03	59	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		6	0.56	33	0.00	22	0.08	16	0.37	85	0.03	24	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		18	0.47	48	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.31	36	0.17	6	0.23
Poblocka 1999		79	0.24	81	0.00	78	0.04	67	0.04	75	0.03	67	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		12	0.50	4	0.10	4	0.15	11	0.41	39	0.13	7	0.23
Rachmaninoff 1923		11	0.50	28	0.01	20	0.06	14	0.37	66	0.04	20	0.12
Rangell 2001		74	0.25	82	0.00	56	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	53	0.05
Richter 1976		76	0.25	88	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	87	0.02	85	0.02
Rosen 1989		22	0.46	11	0.02	9	0.11	9	0.47	56	0.04	16	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.29	69	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	78	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.33	83	0.00	45	0.05	57	0.05	36	0.16	30	0.09
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.29	53	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	38	0.10	38	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		64	0.29	30	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.15	47	0.05	32	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		58	0.33	20	0.01	48	0.07	46	0.07	29	0.21	22	0.12
Rossi 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.20	74	0.00	77	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04	55	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.28	68	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.11	74	0.04	42	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.31	36	0.00	33	0.06	25	0.26	74	0.04	28	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		67	0.29	15	0.01	71	0.04	71	0.04	84	0.03	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		62	0.31	54	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.03	76	0.03
Smith 1975		5	0.57	1	0.14	1	0.14	3	0.59	40	0.11	4	0.25
Sokolov 2002		51	0.36	19	0.01	37	0.06	34	0.18	86	0.02	44	0.06
Sztompka 1959		33	0.42	22	0.01	35	0.05	33	0.20	84	0.03	34	0.08
Tomsic 1995		49	0.37	16	0.01	11	0.10	17	0.36	43	0.12	9	0.21
Uninsky 1932		44	0.39	67	0.00	66	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03
Uninsky 1971		73	0.26	87	0.00	79	0.05	59	0.05	85	0.02	72	0.03
Wasowski 1980		28	0.44	62	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.20	44	0.09	19	0.13
Zak 1937		66	0.29	57	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.04
Zak 1951		60	0.32	39	0.00	67	0.04	74	0.04	71	0.04	58	0.04
Random 1		88	-0.12	38	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	40	0.15	51	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.20	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.14	50	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	38	0.14	52	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).