Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.60	72	0.00	35	0.05	36	0.19	41	0.17	41	0.18
Anderszewski 2003		14	0.70	12	0.02	14	0.09	14	0.46	4	0.52	11	0.49
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 2000		31	0.63	64	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	12	0.42	46	0.14
Badura 1965		43	0.60	38	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.20	11	0.44	30	0.30
Barbosa 1983		71	0.49	61	0.00	61	0.03	74	0.03	50	0.06	75	0.04
Biret 1990		20	0.68	79	0.00	28	0.10	25	0.35	11	0.41	24	0.38
Blet 2003		60	0.55	69	0.00	60	0.03	69	0.03	52	0.05	77	0.04
Block 1995		75	0.48	17	0.01	68	0.04	64	0.04	32	0.20	59	0.09
Blumental 1952		28	0.64	30	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.12	11	0.33	39	0.20
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.62	55	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	31	0.23	54	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.58	74	0.00	67	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.17	62	0.08
Bunin 1987		48	0.58	83	0.00	51	0.04	62	0.04	21	0.38	51	0.12
Bunin 1987b		52	0.58	89	0.00	52	0.06	45	0.06	19	0.40	43	0.15
Chiu 1999		36	0.62	48	0.00	33	0.06	39	0.18	11	0.48	31	0.29
Cohen 1997		72	0.49	20	0.01	80	0.04	60	0.04	23	0.24	55	0.10
Cortot 1951		30	0.63	27	0.01	26	0.09	26	0.31	11	0.46	25	0.38
Csalog 1996		86	0.35	86	0.00	78	0.03	70	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Czerny 1949		50	0.58	47	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.22	30	0.28	34	0.25
Czerny 1990		26	0.64	34	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.22	34	0.18	40	0.20
Duchoud 2007		7	0.72	54	0.00	11	0.09	6	0.51	2	0.66	3	0.58
Ezaki 2006		2	0.74	16	0.01	15	0.07	20	0.40	12	0.41	20	0.40
Falvay 1989		67	0.50	11	0.02	69	0.03	76	0.03	56	0.06	71	0.04
Farrell 1958		34	0.62	60	0.00	66	0.03	66	0.03	55	0.05	72	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		64	0.52	29	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.11	31	0.20	45	0.15
Fliere 1977		12	0.70	45	0.00	21	0.11	11	0.48	22	0.36	18	0.42
Fou 1978		21	0.66	2	0.09	5	0.08	34	0.21	31	0.24	36	0.22
Francois 1956		73	0.49	31	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	46	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923		74	0.49	53	0.00	74	0.03	72	0.03	19	0.36	57	0.10
Friedman 1923b		70	0.49	57	0.00	73	0.03	83	0.03	19	0.36	56	0.10
Friedman 1930		55	0.57	77	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	15	0.42	47	0.14
Garcia 2007		49	0.58	87	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	18	0.37	48	0.14
Garcia 2007b		69	0.50	90	0.00	75	0.03	67	0.03	35	0.13	66	0.06
Gierzod 1998		9	0.72	37	0.00	12	0.11	7	0.51	8	0.52	7	0.51
Gornostaeva 1994		61	0.55	67	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	46	0.05	80	0.04
Groot 1988		58	0.56	76	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	67	0.04	82	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		27	0.64	15	0.01	17	0.08	13	0.46	12	0.44	16	0.45
Hatto 1993		6	0.73	19	0.01	9	0.08	4	0.54	6	0.61	4	0.57
Hatto 1997		4	0.73	36	0.00	10	0.11	5	0.52	3	0.58	6	0.55
Horowitz 1949		37	0.61	49	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	14	0.48	44	0.15
Indjic 1988		5	0.73	14	0.02	8	0.08	3	0.54	4	0.63	2	0.58
Kapell 1951		29	0.63	7	0.03	13	0.08	17	0.44	14	0.40	19	0.42
Kissin 1993		23	0.65	23	0.01	32	0.07	30	0.26	27	0.24	33	0.25
Kushner 1989		18	0.69	18	0.01	16	0.07	15	0.45	7	0.54	10	0.49
Luisada 1991		3	0.73	28	0.01	18	0.09	9	0.48	5	0.51	8	0.49
Lushtak 2004		10	0.72	63	0.00	22	0.13	16	0.45	6	0.45	15	0.45
Malcuzynski 1961		59	0.55	33	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	41	0.11	63	0.07
Magaloff 1978		44	0.59	26	0.01	56	0.04	65	0.04	51	0.06	67	0.05
Magin 1975		8	0.72	6	0.05	2	0.11	2	0.55	2	0.58	5	0.56
Michalowski 1933		40	0.61	35	0.00	25	0.11	22	0.38	3	0.55	14	0.46
Milkina 1970		41	0.61	46	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	49	0.06	68	0.05
Mohovich 1999		33	0.63	66	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.05	79	0.04
Moravec 1969		77	0.48	39	0.00	72	0.03	68	0.03	35	0.24	61	0.08
Morozova 2008		19	0.69	8	0.03	23	0.11	23	0.36	7	0.42	22	0.39
Neighaus 1950		16	0.69	5	0.05	6	0.10	8	0.51	11	0.43	13	0.47
Niedzielski 1931		79	0.45	22	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.10	27	0.28	42	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.77	1	0.31	1	0.31	1	0.59	4	0.57	1	0.58
Osinska 1989		38	0.61	80	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	40	0.14	52	0.11
Pachmann 1927		85	0.39	85	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	60	0.05	74	0.04
Paderewski 1930		46	0.59	78	0.00	65	0.03	77	0.03	31	0.18	64	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.59	73	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.54	51	0.00	62	0.03	82	0.03	26	0.36	53	0.10
Poblocka 1999		32	0.63	4	0.05	3	0.09	19	0.42	16	0.36	21	0.39
Rabcewiczowa 1932		63	0.54	70	0.00	71	0.03	73	0.03	64	0.04	86	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.58	13	0.02	36	0.06	38	0.18	21	0.31	35	0.24
Rangell 2001		68	0.50	59	0.00	64	0.03	80	0.03	25	0.29	60	0.09
Richter 1976		66	0.52	32	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	22	0.31	50	0.12
Rosen 1989		25	0.65	24	0.01	34	0.07	37	0.19	31	0.24	38	0.21
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.48	68	0.00	76	0.05	49	0.05	38	0.17	58	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.41	50	0.00	82	0.03	87	0.03	45	0.05	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.41	56	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	57	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.47	65	0.00	79	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.04	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.41	84	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	57	0.05	81	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.34	62	0.00	87	0.03	71	0.03	50	0.06	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.41	21	0.01	86	0.02	88	0.02	74	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.42	42	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	89	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		57	0.56	41	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	55	0.05	78	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		39	0.61	40	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.29	23	0.40	28	0.34
Shebanova 2002		13	0.70	43	0.00	20	0.10	12	0.47	11	0.51	12	0.49
Smith 1975		15	0.70	3	0.07	4	0.08	10	0.48	9	0.51	9	0.49
Sokolov 2002		17	0.69	25	0.01	27	0.07	27	0.30	13	0.44	26	0.36
Sztompka 1959		11	0.71	10	0.02	24	0.13	18	0.44	15	0.44	17	0.44
Tomsic 1995		65	0.52	81	0.00	77	0.05	47	0.05	69	0.04	73	0.04
Uninsky 1932		51	0.58	52	0.00	38	0.07	29	0.26	21	0.41	29	0.33
Uninsky 1971		56	0.57	71	0.00	37	0.05	31	0.25	29	0.34	32	0.29
Wasowski 1980		45	0.59	44	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.18	23	0.24	37	0.21
Zak 1937		22	0.66	58	0.00	19	0.09	24	0.36	19	0.40	23	0.38
Zak 1951		24	0.65	9	0.03	7	0.09	21	0.40	21	0.33	27	0.36
Random 1		90	-0.15	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	47	0.05	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.02	88	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	25	0.20	65	0.06
Random 3		88	0.14	75	0.00	88	0.03	85	0.03	2	0.65	49	0.14

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).