Smith 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.65	88	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	48	0.05	65	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.72	49	0.00	17	0.12	11	0.46	10	0.46	9	0.46
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.70	10	0.02	6	0.13	9	0.51	10	0.48	6	0.49
Bacha 2000		70	0.53	68	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	21	0.32	50	0.11
Badura 1965		66	0.55	42	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.05	81	0.04
Barbosa 1983		56	0.58	25	0.01	26	0.08	24	0.29	7	0.53	19	0.39
Biret 1990		36	0.65	48	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.33	13	0.38	25	0.35
Blet 2003		28	0.66	43	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.21	17	0.35	32	0.27
Block 1995		53	0.60	64	0.00	56	0.04	72	0.04	21	0.33	54	0.11
Blumental 1952		72	0.53	8	0.03	7	0.10	21	0.34	12	0.33	27	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		37	0.65	79	0.00	64	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.05	71	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		18	0.67	22	0.01	39	0.04	37	0.12	11	0.45	34	0.23
Bunin 1987		69	0.53	67	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	40	0.18	66	0.07
Bunin 1987b		71	0.53	89	0.00	75	0.04	59	0.04	42	0.15	62	0.08
Chiu 1999		65	0.56	85	0.00	65	0.05	50	0.05	31	0.22	56	0.10
Cohen 1997		86	0.39	90	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	20	0.30	59	0.09
Cortot 1951		43	0.63	73	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.13	20	0.35	37	0.21
Csalog 1996		87	0.38	86	0.00	87	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.05	77	0.04
Czerny 1949		32	0.65	75	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.11	73	0.04	64	0.07
Czerny 1990		5	0.75	15	0.01	5	0.09	4	0.54	16	0.45	7	0.49
Duchoud 2007		47	0.62	27	0.01	36	0.05	33	0.15	26	0.33	36	0.22
Ezaki 2006		1	0.79	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.64	4	0.58	2	0.61
Falvay 1989		23	0.67	4	0.08	9	0.08	30	0.23	10	0.53	24	0.35
Farrell 1958		29	0.66	33	0.00	29	0.11	18	0.35	5	0.51	13	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.67	5	0.06	20	0.09	28	0.25	3	0.58	21	0.38
Fliere 1977		3	0.76	24	0.01	11	0.08	8	0.51	28	0.30	17	0.39
Fou 1978		52	0.60	32	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	40	0.11	52	0.11
Francois 1956		27	0.66	61	0.00	23	0.09	27	0.26	19	0.40	29	0.32
Friedman 1923		85	0.41	51	0.00	80	0.04	56	0.04	27	0.29	55	0.11
Friedman 1923b		84	0.41	69	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	26	0.29	60	0.09
Friedman 1930		63	0.57	38	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	14	0.43	41	0.15
Garcia 2007		74	0.53	84	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	64	0.04	86	0.03
Garcia 2007b		77	0.49	62	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	38	0.12	67	0.06
Gierzod 1998		10	0.71	57	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.27	26	0.31	30	0.29
Gornostaeva 1994		2	0.78	2	0.18	2	0.25	2	0.61	1	0.71	1	0.66
Groot 1988		25	0.66	36	0.00	12	0.07	14	0.43	13	0.49	11	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		14	0.69	37	0.00	15	0.07	17	0.37	30	0.27	28	0.32
Hatto 1993		82	0.47	66	0.00	76	0.02	85	0.02	67	0.04	87	0.03
Hatto 1997		75	0.51	45	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Horowitz 1949		78	0.49	81	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	79	0.03	88	0.02
Indjic 1988		79	0.48	72	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Kapell 1951		17	0.68	12	0.01	19	0.10	10	0.50	16	0.37	12	0.43
Kissin 1993		21	0.67	34	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.06	70	0.05
Kushner 1989		12	0.71	18	0.01	18	0.09	22	0.33	26	0.33	26	0.33
Luisada 1991		11	0.71	59	0.00	22	0.09	15	0.39	20	0.43	14	0.41
Lushtak 2004		26	0.66	9	0.03	13	0.10	6	0.53	11	0.41	8	0.47
Malcuzynski 1961		39	0.63	52	0.00	58	0.04	68	0.04	29	0.22	57	0.09
Magaloff 1978		16	0.68	11	0.02	10	0.08	16	0.37	14	0.41	18	0.39
Magin 1975		30	0.66	50	0.00	38	0.04	44	0.09	26	0.23	43	0.14
Michalowski 1933		54	0.59	31	0.00	57	0.04	71	0.04	28	0.30	53	0.11
Milkina 1970		35	0.65	54	0.00	48	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.14	63	0.07
Mohovich 1999		6	0.74	7	0.03	8	0.09	7	0.52	16	0.49	5	0.50
Moravec 1969		67	0.55	23	0.01	70	0.03	73	0.03	20	0.37	51	0.11
Morozova 2008		33	0.65	55	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.16	35	0.17	39	0.16
Neighaus 1950		15	0.69	35	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.46	24	0.30	22	0.37
Niedzielski 1931		73	0.53	41	0.00	81	0.05	55	0.05	56	0.04	74	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.66	30	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.12	34	0.17	44	0.14
Osinska 1989		4	0.76	6	0.06	3	0.13	5	0.54	9	0.51	4	0.52
Pachmann 1927		81	0.48	82	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	75	0.04	83	0.03
Paderewski 1930		40	0.63	56	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	17	0.33	47	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		22	0.67	44	0.00	25	0.07	19	0.35	17	0.36	23	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		42	0.63	65	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	29	0.34	48	0.12
Poblocka 1999		44	0.63	83	0.00	60	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.06	73	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		41	0.63	47	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.11	8	0.44	35	0.22
Rachmaninoff 1923		57	0.58	28	0.01	34	0.05	34	0.14	37	0.14	42	0.14
Rangell 2001		68	0.54	74	0.00	66	0.05	46	0.05	27	0.28	49	0.12
Richter 1976		80	0.48	70	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	62	0.04	82	0.03
Rosen 1989		7	0.73	3	0.09	4	0.15	12	0.46	15	0.47	10	0.46
Rosenthal 1930		50	0.61	26	0.01	53	0.04	67	0.04	11	0.48	46	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		51	0.60	40	0.00	42	0.05	35	0.13	6	0.62	31	0.28
Rosenthal 1931b		62	0.57	58	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	6	0.57	38	0.17
Rosenthal 1931c		46	0.62	20	0.01	30	0.08	29	0.25	7	0.63	16	0.40
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.58	63	0.00	54	0.05	54	0.05	11	0.49	40	0.16
Rossi 2007		61	0.57	16	0.01	32	0.05	40	0.11	3	0.59	33	0.25
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.41	53	0.00	84	0.02	88	0.02	43	0.12	68	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.50	39	0.00	46	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.21	61	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.59	19	0.01	47	0.05	48	0.05	23	0.39	45	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.61	29	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.05	78	0.04
Shebanova 2002		38	0.65	60	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.05	80	0.04
Smith 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sokolov 2002		31	0.66	13	0.01	24	0.07	20	0.35	10	0.47	15	0.41
Sztompka 1959		8	0.72	14	0.01	14	0.08	3	0.56	9	0.52	3	0.54
Tomsic 1995		19	0.67	17	0.01	27	0.08	26	0.27	12	0.53	20	0.38
Uninsky 1932		60	0.58	21	0.01	68	0.04	60	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.04
Uninsky 1971		58	0.58	46	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	51	0.06	76	0.04
Wasowski 1980		64	0.56	71	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	49	0.05	72	0.04
Zak 1937		48	0.61	80	0.00	52	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.05	75	0.04
Zak 1951		45	0.62	76	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.21	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.23	77	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	78	0.00	88	0.03	84	0.03	24	0.25	58	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).