Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		56	0.43	39	0.00	65	0.07	46	0.07	88	0.02	59	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.49	16	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.26	54	0.04	28	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		58	0.41	40	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	84	0.03	64	0.04
Bacha 2000		32	0.49	48	0.00	32	0.06	30	0.21	51	0.06	22	0.11
Badura 1965		84	0.22	12	0.00	81	0.02	88	0.02	79	0.03	88	0.02
Barbosa 1983		86	0.17	53	0.00	73	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.03	85	0.02
Biret 1990		24	0.51	44	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.14	80	0.04	40	0.07
Blet 2003		61	0.39	17	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	63	0.04	58	0.04
Block 1995		37	0.46	49	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.16	71	0.03	38	0.07
Blumental 1952		66	0.34	20	0.00	45	0.04	73	0.04	71	0.03	79	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.45	38	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.10	84	0.02	63	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.63	45	0.00	6	0.19	9	0.50	10	0.46	6	0.48
Bunin 1987		73	0.32	36	0.00	79	0.04	71	0.04	83	0.03	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		74	0.31	57	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03
Chiu 1999		77	0.29	68	0.00	46	0.04	69	0.04	87	0.03	68	0.03
Cohen 1997		69	0.33	26	0.00	34	0.05	31	0.18	19	0.30	12	0.23
Cortot 1951		62	0.38	76	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		57	0.42	85	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	65	0.04	57	0.04
Czerny 1949		60	0.39	24	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1990		26	0.51	34	0.00	29	0.05	23	0.27	83	0.03	30	0.09
Duchoud 2007		64	0.37	46	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	84	0.03	60	0.04
Ezaki 2006		27	0.50	15	0.00	30	0.05	28	0.24	77	0.03	32	0.08
Falvay 1989		15	0.56	77	0.00	9	0.15	7	0.52	26	0.37	7	0.44
Farrell 1958		31	0.49	65	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.25	54	0.05	23	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.33	41	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02
Fliere 1977		12	0.58	71	0.00	22	0.09	13	0.45	51	0.05	16	0.15
Fou 1978		22	0.53	9	0.00	13	0.13	10	0.49	45	0.08	14	0.20
Francois 1956		29	0.49	37	0.00	50	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.04	66	0.04
Friedman 1923		87	0.17	35	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.04	83	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.18	58	0.00	86	0.04	72	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		80	0.28	27	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.03	76	0.03
Garcia 2007		53	0.43	14	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04
Garcia 2007b		68	0.33	29	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	64	0.04	46	0.06
Gierzod 1998		19	0.54	61	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.17	87	0.02	45	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.66	59	0.00	7	0.20	14	0.45	32	0.26	10	0.34
Groot 1988		28	0.50	50	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.26	80	0.03	31	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.41	86	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.30	57	0.04	27	0.11
Hatto 1993		83	0.26	87	0.00	75	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.03	89	0.02
Hatto 1997		79	0.28	4	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	87	0.03	77	0.03
Horowitz 1949		49	0.44	28	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	68	0.03	54	0.04
Indjic 1988		82	0.27	88	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	85	0.03	74	0.03
Kapell 1951		34	0.49	89	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	86	0.02	69	0.03
Kissin 1993		18	0.54	54	0.00	15	0.09	16	0.43	64	0.04	19	0.13
Kushner 1989		10	0.59	42	0.00	20	0.08	20	0.31	69	0.04	24	0.11
Luisada 1991		38	0.46	32	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.13	73	0.03	41	0.06
Lushtak 2004		70	0.33	69	0.00	48	0.05	58	0.05	79	0.03	62	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.60	5	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.34	54	0.04	21	0.12
Magaloff 1978		5	0.69	18	0.00	5	0.34	5	0.66	11	0.44	5	0.54
Magin 1975		16	0.56	60	0.00	14	0.08	17	0.42	57	0.05	18	0.14
Michalowski 1933		81	0.27	11	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03	73	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.65	21	0.00	8	0.24	8	0.51	39	0.13	11	0.26
Mohovich 1999		17	0.55	78	0.00	25	0.08	22	0.30	71	0.04	25	0.11
Moravec 1969		14	0.57	22	0.00	11	0.11	12	0.46	17	0.39	8	0.42
Morozova 2008		63	0.38	51	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	88	0.02	75	0.03
Neighaus 1950		42	0.45	66	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	81	0.03	65	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		35	0.48	55	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.14	63	0.03	43	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.43	79	0.00	66	0.05	54	0.05	86	0.03	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		25	0.51	47	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.11	85	0.03	42	0.06
Pachmann 1927		44	0.45	62	0.00	47	0.05	56	0.05	33	0.14	34	0.08
Paderewski 1930		36	0.47	80	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	59	0.04	55	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.44	30	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.13	59	0.04	35	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.43	81	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.11	60	0.05	36	0.07
Poblocka 1999		46	0.44	63	0.00	69	0.05	63	0.05	86	0.03	49	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.44	52	0.00	26	0.06	32	0.18	57	0.04	33	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		21	0.53	8	0.00	16	0.09	15	0.43	48	0.05	17	0.15
Rangell 2001		20	0.54	56	0.00	18	0.07	27	0.24	45	0.05	26	0.11
Richter 1976		67	0.34	73	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.03	71	0.03
Rosen 1989		13	0.57	10	0.00	19	0.09	19	0.32	77	0.03	29	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.76	6	0.00	4	0.41	4	0.82	4	0.81	4	0.81
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.95	2	0.06	2	0.91	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.97	1	0.91	1	0.90	1	0.98	2	0.99	1	0.98
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.86	3	0.01	3	0.85	3	0.94	2	0.93	3	0.93
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		72	0.33	67	0.00	23	0.07	29	0.21	46	0.07	20	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		48	0.44	23	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.15	26	0.30	13	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		23	0.51	74	0.00	10	0.10	6	0.53	30	0.30	9	0.40
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.45	25	0.00	52	0.07	45	0.07	83	0.03	47	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.44	7	0.00	28	0.08	35	0.16	77	0.03	37	0.07
Shebanova 2002		39	0.46	64	0.00	64	0.06	48	0.06	57	0.05	48	0.05
Smith 1975		11	0.58	19	0.00	12	0.12	11	0.49	54	0.05	15	0.16
Sokolov 2002		33	0.49	43	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	73	0.03	50	0.04
Sztompka 1959		65	0.35	82	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03	72	0.03
Tomsic 1995		54	0.43	75	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	75	0.03	53	0.04
Uninsky 1932		78	0.29	72	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	79	0.03	87	0.02
Uninsky 1971		75	0.31	31	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.02	84	0.02
Wasowski 1980		76	0.30	83	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.04	67	0.03
Zak 1937		41	0.45	70	0.00	51	0.05	59	0.05	80	0.03	51	0.04
Zak 1951		45	0.44	13	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	86	0.03	52	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.10	33	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	30	0.27	39	0.07
Random 2		88	-0.07	84	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	23	0.21	44	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.10	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).