Michalowski 1933

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		37	0.50	62	0.00	32	0.08	23	0.37	64	0.04	38	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.60	16	0.01	24	0.09	11	0.45	15	0.36	15	0.40
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.61	5	0.07	7	0.19	3	0.55	22	0.38	7	0.46
Bacha 2000		77	0.29	45	0.00	66	0.05	64	0.05	70	0.04	64	0.04
Badura 1965		33	0.52	84	0.00	48	0.06	56	0.06	45	0.06	50	0.06
Barbosa 1983		81	0.25	76	0.00	63	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03
Biret 1990		43	0.47	67	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.18	56	0.05	42	0.09
Blet 2003		41	0.47	29	0.00	36	0.11	36	0.27	44	0.09	33	0.16
Block 1995		65	0.37	48	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	58	0.04	71	0.04
Blumental 1952		42	0.47	15	0.01	13	0.08	30	0.30	9	0.35	24	0.32
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.56	26	0.00	43	0.09	40	0.17	36	0.17	32	0.17
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.35	21	0.01	75	0.04	72	0.04	86	0.03	73	0.03
Bunin 1987		39	0.49	85	0.00	31	0.08	22	0.38	11	0.47	13	0.42
Bunin 1987b		40	0.49	25	0.00	30	0.07	21	0.39	11	0.48	11	0.43
Chiu 1999		72	0.34	35	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Cohen 1997		85	0.18	19	0.01	82	0.03	82	0.03	59	0.04	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		17	0.58	68	0.00	22	0.08	16	0.41	16	0.39	16	0.40
Csalog 1996		84	0.20	38	0.00	83	0.04	74	0.04	76	0.03	79	0.03
Czerny 1949		6	0.62	2	0.16	3	0.22	2	0.63	9	0.51	2	0.57
Czerny 1990		18	0.58	28	0.00	29	0.09	20	0.39	53	0.05	36	0.14
Duchoud 2007		25	0.54	13	0.01	17	0.07	15	0.42	6	0.42	12	0.42
Ezaki 2006		34	0.51	70	0.00	47	0.07	52	0.07	73	0.03	52	0.05
Falvay 1989		82	0.22	56	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.04	76	0.03
Farrell 1958		66	0.36	37	0.00	67	0.06	60	0.06	76	0.04	57	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.53	34	0.00	10	0.09	14	0.42	10	0.40	14	0.41
Fliere 1977		24	0.55	78	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	74	0.03	46	0.06
Fou 1978		73	0.32	51	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.04
Francois 1956		45	0.46	36	0.00	49	0.07	53	0.07	63	0.04	63	0.05
Friedman 1923		44	0.47	79	0.00	35	0.09	31	0.29	8	0.53	20	0.39
Friedman 1923b		47	0.46	41	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.29	9	0.52	19	0.39
Friedman 1930		7	0.61	39	0.00	26	0.06	19	0.40	7	0.50	8	0.45
Garcia 2007		36	0.50	64	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.28	22	0.34	26	0.31
Garcia 2007b		22	0.55	47	0.00	23	0.11	24	0.36	5	0.44	17	0.40
Gierzod 1998		14	0.59	89	0.00	12	0.09	12	0.44	30	0.28	22	0.35
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.53	58	0.00	45	0.08	47	0.08	52	0.05	51	0.06
Groot 1988		74	0.32	65	0.00	61	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.55	30	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.32	42	0.10	31	0.18
Hatto 1993		50	0.44	63	0.00	25	0.07	34	0.28	35	0.16	30	0.21
Hatto 1997		51	0.43	54	0.00	11	0.10	29	0.30	25	0.23	27	0.26
Horowitz 1949		52	0.43	57	0.00	60	0.04	73	0.04	42	0.10	49	0.06
Indjic 1988		54	0.43	61	0.00	18	0.07	37	0.27	29	0.20	29	0.23
Kapell 1951		5	0.62	42	0.00	6	0.21	10	0.48	12	0.41	10	0.44
Kissin 1993		57	0.41	87	0.00	69	0.07	49	0.07	83	0.03	60	0.05
Kushner 1989		26	0.54	10	0.02	15	0.07	25	0.33	47	0.06	35	0.14
Luisada 1991		48	0.46	18	0.01	50	0.07	48	0.07	59	0.04	53	0.05
Lushtak 2004		56	0.42	72	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	86	0.02	70	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.52	9	0.03	37	0.07	39	0.17	36	0.13	34	0.15
Magaloff 1978		62	0.39	40	0.00	73	0.06	57	0.06	82	0.03	66	0.04
Magin 1975		21	0.56	8	0.03	14	0.08	27	0.31	30	0.19	28	0.24
Michalowski 1933		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		60	0.40	73	0.00	71	0.06	58	0.06	55	0.05	58	0.05
Mohovich 1999		55	0.42	83	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.03	81	0.03
Moravec 1969		71	0.34	17	0.01	68	0.05	62	0.05	54	0.04	65	0.04
Morozova 2008		35	0.50	6	0.04	38	0.06	42	0.16	67	0.04	43	0.08
Neighaus 1950		16	0.59	11	0.01	9	0.11	5	0.52	33	0.20	25	0.32
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.41	43	0.00	54	0.07	51	0.07	85	0.03	56	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.59	52	0.00	20	0.09	17	0.41	28	0.26	23	0.33
Osinska 1989		31	0.52	74	0.00	52	0.09	45	0.09	70	0.04	47	0.06
Pachmann 1927		79	0.29	53	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Paderewski 1930		10	0.60	50	0.00	21	0.07	18	0.40	9	0.39	18	0.39
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.45	88	0.00	46	0.06	55	0.06	56	0.04	54	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.37	44	0.00	74	0.06	59	0.06	65	0.04	55	0.05
Poblocka 1999		8	0.61	3	0.12	4	0.16	8	0.48	11	0.44	5	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		4	0.63	12	0.01	16	0.07	9	0.48	16	0.41	9	0.44
Rachmaninoff 1923		53	0.43	31	0.00	53	0.09	46	0.09	67	0.04	48	0.06
Rangell 2001		63	0.38	7	0.03	58	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		59	0.40	32	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	53	0.05	59	0.05
Rosen 1989		28	0.53	81	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.16	69	0.04	45	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		46	0.46	33	0.00	57	0.05	65	0.05	46	0.05	61	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.30	75	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.30	59	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		61	0.40	20	0.01	72	0.05	66	0.05	61	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.27	55	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		70	0.34	23	0.01	78	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.04	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.09	90	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		86	0.10	49	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.03	90	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		83	0.21	46	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.03	80	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		11	0.60	14	0.01	8	0.15	6	0.50	22	0.42	6	0.46
Shebanova 2002		27	0.53	69	0.00	39	0.07	33	0.28	58	0.05	37	0.12
Smith 1975		13	0.59	22	0.01	28	0.08	28	0.30	71	0.04	40	0.11
Sokolov 2002		19	0.56	24	0.01	19	0.06	13	0.42	28	0.35	21	0.38
Sztompka 1959		1	0.71	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.63	5	0.56	1	0.59
Tomsic 1995		78	0.29	66	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	55	0.05	69	0.04
Uninsky 1932		2	0.65	27	0.00	5	0.19	7	0.49	5	0.57	4	0.53
Uninsky 1971		3	0.64	4	0.09	2	0.22	4	0.53	6	0.53	3	0.53
Wasowski 1980		38	0.49	71	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.15	59	0.05	41	0.09
Zak 1937		69	0.35	86	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.03	77	0.03
Zak 1951		67	0.36	80	0.00	62	0.05	63	0.05	87	0.03	68	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.14	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	37	0.21	62	0.05
Random 2		89	0.00	82	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	14	0.29	44	0.08
Random 3		88	0.06	60	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	5	0.52	39	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).