Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.72	9	0.01	9	0.14	5	0.55	11	0.47	8	0.51
Anderszewski 2003		52	0.52	21	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.17	35	0.13	35	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		42	0.57	84	0.00	26	0.09	29	0.34	31	0.25	30	0.29
Bacha 2000		77	0.38	39	0.00	70	0.06	55	0.06	78	0.03	62	0.04
Badura 1965		20	0.64	2	0.04	15	0.12	16	0.43	5	0.54	11	0.48
Barbosa 1983		64	0.48	10	0.01	54	0.06	54	0.06	29	0.22	44	0.11
Biret 1990		51	0.52	54	0.00	53	0.06	56	0.06	54	0.05	61	0.05
Blet 2003		6	0.72	20	0.00	16	0.13	10	0.48	9	0.45	13	0.46
Block 1995		57	0.50	45	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.13	46	0.05	47	0.08
Blumental 1952		61	0.49	57	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.13	46	0.05	48	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.65	13	0.01	33	0.07	32	0.28	21	0.36	27	0.32
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.40	58	0.00	80	0.05	72	0.05	83	0.03	66	0.04
Bunin 1987		8	0.71	15	0.01	14	0.11	14	0.45	2	0.59	7	0.52
Bunin 1987b		9	0.71	25	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.45	2	0.60	6	0.52
Chiu 1999		73	0.42	22	0.00	64	0.05	67	0.05	70	0.03	67	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.15	59	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	61	0.04	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		11	0.68	49	0.00	18	0.15	18	0.39	8	0.49	19	0.44
Csalog 1996		70	0.43	30	0.00	58	0.05	70	0.05	35	0.16	46	0.09
Czerny 1949		4	0.73	28	0.00	6	0.09	4	0.56	10	0.51	4	0.53
Czerny 1990		14	0.66	69	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.32	45	0.06	38	0.14
Duchoud 2007		26	0.60	78	0.00	32	0.09	28	0.34	9	0.42	25	0.38
Ezaki 2006		22	0.63	66	0.00	34	0.08	33	0.25	49	0.05	42	0.11
Falvay 1989		80	0.34	79	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.03	87	0.02
Farrell 1958		69	0.43	73	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		13	0.66	8	0.01	17	0.11	17	0.40	4	0.52	15	0.46
Fliere 1977		12	0.67	32	0.00	29	0.06	26	0.34	57	0.04	40	0.12
Fou 1978		68	0.43	60	0.00	68	0.05	71	0.05	86	0.03	70	0.04
Francois 1956		49	0.53	51	0.00	61	0.09	45	0.09	56	0.05	51	0.07
Friedman 1923		65	0.48	56	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.34	4	0.59	17	0.45
Friedman 1923b		60	0.49	62	0.00	23	0.10	21	0.38	5	0.59	12	0.47
Friedman 1930		62	0.49	89	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.22	17	0.42	29	0.30
Garcia 2007		45	0.56	75	0.00	50	0.05	63	0.05	15	0.41	37	0.14
Garcia 2007b		74	0.42	46	0.00	51	0.06	59	0.06	22	0.22	45	0.11
Gierzod 1998		15	0.66	5	0.02	21	0.11	15	0.44	24	0.33	24	0.38
Gornostaeva 1994		50	0.53	40	0.00	65	0.05	64	0.05	64	0.03	75	0.04
Groot 1988		58	0.50	68	0.00	66	0.06	50	0.06	73	0.03	76	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.62	4	0.02	3	0.21	2	0.60	5	0.47	5	0.53
Hatto 1993		63	0.49	44	0.00	20	0.12	22	0.36	13	0.43	23	0.39
Hatto 1997		47	0.53	71	0.00	12	0.12	11	0.47	12	0.45	14	0.46
Horowitz 1949		35	0.58	33	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	21	0.40	32	0.21
Indjic 1988		55	0.51	67	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.38	12	0.44	21	0.41
Kapell 1951		7	0.72	26	0.00	10	0.13	12	0.47	9	0.44	16	0.45
Kissin 1993		32	0.59	41	0.00	60	0.07	48	0.07	81	0.03	58	0.05
Kushner 1989		33	0.58	85	0.00	57	0.06	53	0.06	68	0.04	57	0.05
Luisada 1991		56	0.50	23	0.00	63	0.05	69	0.05	77	0.03	64	0.04
Lushtak 2004		46	0.54	48	0.00	28	0.07	31	0.30	43	0.09	34	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.60	7	0.02	5	0.08	34	0.23	24	0.24	31	0.23
Magaloff 1978		71	0.42	31	0.00	73	0.05	66	0.05	79	0.03	68	0.04
Magin 1975		43	0.57	34	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	60	0.04	56	0.05
Michalowski 1933		19	0.64	63	0.00	7	0.11	6	0.53	4	0.53	3	0.53
Milkina 1970		53	0.52	36	0.00	67	0.07	46	0.07	48	0.06	53	0.06
Mohovich 1999		28	0.60	35	0.00	49	0.07	47	0.07	53	0.05	54	0.06
Moravec 1969		66	0.45	37	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.04
Morozova 2008		40	0.57	61	0.00	47	0.05	65	0.05	73	0.03	73	0.04
Neighaus 1950		21	0.63	19	0.00	11	0.13	8	0.51	16	0.34	20	0.42
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.56	87	0.00	55	0.06	57	0.06	43	0.08	50	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.58	6	0.02	27	0.07	27	0.34	26	0.27	28	0.30
Osinska 1989		36	0.58	50	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.03	65	0.04
Pachmann 1927		67	0.45	47	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	51	0.05	71	0.04
Paderewski 1930		39	0.57	11	0.01	43	0.06	43	0.11	29	0.19	36	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		17	0.64	53	0.00	25	0.08	19	0.39	21	0.31	26	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.38	43	0.00	78	0.04	79	0.04	75	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		2	0.75	3	0.03	4	0.16	7	0.51	9	0.48	9	0.49
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.59	18	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.15	27	0.27	33	0.20
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.51	82	0.00	48	0.06	60	0.06	69	0.04	55	0.05
Rangell 2001		72	0.42	90	0.00	74	0.04	75	0.04	67	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		18	0.64	16	0.00	31	0.08	24	0.36	5	0.54	18	0.44
Rosen 1989		41	0.57	24	0.00	52	0.05	61	0.05	71	0.03	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.53	17	0.00	62	0.06	49	0.06	55	0.04	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.32	38	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.30	76	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.41	80	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	87	0.02	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.31	65	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	75	0.03	90	0.02
Rossi 2007		85	0.26	88	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	59	0.05	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.24	27	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.04	79	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.32	72	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		79	0.37	74	0.00	79	0.04	77	0.04	77	0.04	72	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.73	14	0.01	2	0.23	3	0.59	3	0.55	2	0.57
Shebanova 2002		25	0.60	52	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.15	44	0.10	41	0.12
Smith 1975		34	0.58	12	0.01	56	0.06	51	0.06	75	0.03	69	0.04
Sokolov 2002		29	0.60	42	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.36	17	0.42	22	0.39
Sztompka 1959		10	0.70	55	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.48	12	0.50	10	0.49
Tomsic 1995		59	0.49	83	0.00	72	0.06	58	0.06	88	0.02	81	0.03
Uninsky 1932		1	0.89	1	0.70	1	0.69	1	0.84	1	0.86	1	0.85
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		38	0.58	64	0.00	40	0.07	37	0.18	40	0.10	39	0.13
Zak 1937		27	0.60	29	0.00	46	0.05	68	0.05	49	0.07	52	0.06
Zak 1951		30	0.60	70	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.18	47	0.07	43	0.11
Random 1		88	-0.02	77	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	2	0.57	49	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.08	86	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	16	0.24	59	0.05
Random 3		89	-0.07	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	59	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).