Garcia 2007b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		52	0.40	20	0.00	27	0.05	23	0.21	75	0.03	36	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.50	81	0.00	13	0.07	21	0.22	36	0.13	11	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.50	84	0.00	41	0.05	35	0.13	67	0.03	47	0.06
Bacha 2000		49	0.41	8	0.01	36	0.04	42	0.09	54	0.06	38	0.07
Badura 1965		74	0.30	52	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Barbosa 1983		84	0.23	85	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.04	79	0.03
Biret 1990		6	0.53	69	0.00	11	0.08	8	0.34	68	0.05	16	0.13
Blet 2003		51	0.40	13	0.01	47	0.05	51	0.05	72	0.03	63	0.04
Block 1995		68	0.35	37	0.00	20	0.05	30	0.17	45	0.05	31	0.09
Blumental 1952		21	0.47	48	0.00	19	0.05	17	0.25	24	0.21	6	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.50	32	0.00	40	0.05	31	0.15	63	0.04	37	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		20	0.48	23	0.00	24	0.05	34	0.13	58	0.05	35	0.08
Bunin 1987		56	0.39	53	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.04	67	0.04
Bunin 1987b		57	0.38	24	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	67	0.04	60	0.04
Chiu 1999		41	0.43	41	0.00	71	0.05	49	0.05	74	0.03	56	0.04
Cohen 1997		77	0.29	42	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.06	66	0.04
Cortot 1951		31	0.45	44	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.17	38	0.17	12	0.17
Csalog 1996		87	0.16	28	0.00	87	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		54	0.39	60	0.00	18	0.05	16	0.25	48	0.06	18	0.12
Czerny 1990		55	0.39	83	0.00	58	0.05	52	0.05	80	0.03	69	0.04
Duchoud 2007		44	0.42	18	0.01	53	0.03	73	0.03	55	0.04	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		42	0.42	89	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	76	0.03	71	0.03
Falvay 1989		81	0.26	51	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.04	75	0.03
Farrell 1958		9	0.51	2	0.12	2	0.23	4	0.51	13	0.36	2	0.43
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.41	54	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.14	34	0.16	13	0.15
Fliere 1977		18	0.49	73	0.00	33	0.06	18	0.24	83	0.03	34	0.08
Fou 1978		23	0.46	27	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	71	0.04	58	0.04
Francois 1956		75	0.30	63	0.00	59	0.05	48	0.05	81	0.03	70	0.04
Friedman 1923		33	0.45	36	0.00	54	0.03	74	0.03	30	0.27	32	0.09
Friedman 1923b		36	0.44	25	0.00	55	0.06	46	0.06	32	0.26	20	0.12
Friedman 1930		26	0.46	61	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	44	0.12	41	0.07
Garcia 2007		1	0.72	1	0.64	1	0.63	1	0.81	1	0.84	1	0.82
Garcia 2007b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gierzod 1998		16	0.49	55	0.00	14	0.07	7	0.38	58	0.04	19	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		27	0.45	47	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	68	0.04
Groot 1988		73	0.32	35	0.00	21	0.06	27	0.18	82	0.03	42	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.49	6	0.01	43	0.05	40	0.10	73	0.03	54	0.05
Hatto 1993		22	0.46	78	0.00	42	0.06	33	0.14	56	0.04	43	0.07
Hatto 1997		30	0.45	77	0.00	44	0.05	41	0.10	78	0.03	52	0.05
Horowitz 1949		53	0.40	34	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.04
Indjic 1988		29	0.45	82	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	73	0.04	51	0.05
Kapell 1951		34	0.45	39	0.00	9	0.06	11	0.31	53	0.05	17	0.12
Kissin 1993		67	0.36	74	0.00	72	0.04	62	0.04	86	0.03	78	0.03
Kushner 1989		25	0.46	14	0.01	15	0.07	14	0.26	60	0.05	21	0.11
Luisada 1991		2	0.58	17	0.01	5	0.13	6	0.39	34	0.20	5	0.28
Lushtak 2004		35	0.44	86	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	81	0.03	64	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		61	0.37	64	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	77	0.03	76	0.03
Magaloff 1978		66	0.36	68	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	80	0.03	74	0.03
Magin 1975		12	0.50	7	0.01	7	0.11	12	0.27	38	0.14	7	0.19
Michalowski 1933		3	0.55	22	0.00	4	0.16	5	0.44	24	0.36	3	0.40
Milkina 1970		63	0.37	88	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	77	0.04	59	0.04
Mohovich 1999		40	0.43	71	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	77	0.03	65	0.04
Moravec 1969		85	0.22	50	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	50	0.04	72	0.03
Morozova 2008		8	0.52	72	0.00	16	0.06	25	0.19	57	0.04	29	0.09
Neighaus 1950		4	0.54	16	0.01	6	0.12	3	0.54	47	0.07	9	0.19
Niedzielski 1931		72	0.33	26	0.00	28	0.05	20	0.22	38	0.14	10	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.49	57	0.00	34	0.05	26	0.19	60	0.04	28	0.09
Osinska 1989		38	0.43	5	0.01	17	0.05	19	0.22	57	0.04	27	0.09
Pachmann 1927		83	0.24	3	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.03	88	0.02
Paderewski 1930		58	0.38	56	0.00	38	0.05	44	0.09	41	0.11	25	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.45	70	0.00	8	0.06	10	0.32	49	0.05	14	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		39	0.43	10	0.01	57	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.05	50	0.05
Poblocka 1999		48	0.41	65	0.00	37	0.04	37	0.13	68	0.04	39	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		24	0.46	87	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	70	0.03	57	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.42	46	0.00	30	0.05	43	0.09	70	0.04	44	0.06
Rangell 2001		71	0.33	43	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	85	0.03
Richter 1976		82	0.26	40	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	57	0.05	62	0.04
Rosen 1989		7	0.53	15	0.01	12	0.07	9	0.34	42	0.11	8	0.19
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.29	49	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		69	0.34	67	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	52	0.04	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		64	0.37	30	0.00	70	0.05	56	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.27	79	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.33	76	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	44	0.08	48	0.06
Rossi 2007		60	0.38	31	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	52	0.06	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		62	0.37	9	0.01	67	0.04	61	0.04	34	0.23	24	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		86	0.21	33	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		79	0.27	90	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	67	0.04	82	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.40	12	0.01	22	0.07	24	0.20	50	0.06	23	0.11
Shebanova 2002		28	0.45	45	0.00	10	0.06	15	0.25	80	0.03	30	0.09
Smith 1975		17	0.49	75	0.00	39	0.03	38	0.12	80	0.03	45	0.06
Sokolov 2002		47	0.41	80	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	67	0.03	73	0.03
Sztompka 1959		5	0.54	11	0.01	3	0.17	2	0.55	38	0.21	4	0.34
Tomsic 1995		78	0.29	66	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	70	0.04	77	0.03
Uninsky 1932		14	0.49	19	0.00	32	0.06	13	0.26	46	0.07	15	0.13
Uninsky 1971		45	0.42	21	0.00	29	0.05	22	0.22	59	0.06	22	0.11
Wasowski 1980		37	0.44	38	0.00	23	0.06	28	0.18	73	0.04	33	0.08
Zak 1937		59	0.38	4	0.01	25	0.05	36	0.13	81	0.03	46	0.06
Zak 1951		65	0.36	29	0.00	26	0.05	39	0.11	74	0.04	40	0.07
Random 1		89	-0.08	59	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	10	0.46	26	0.10
Random 2		90	-0.18	58	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.01	62	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.28	53	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).