Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.59	12	0.03	15	0.07	17	0.31	38	0.22	26	0.26
Anderszewski 2003		3	0.72	1	0.23	1	0.23	6	0.49	1	0.55	5	0.52
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.72	6	0.04	3	0.17	2	0.58	2	0.55	2	0.56
Bacha 2000		74	0.46	87	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	55	0.05	63	0.05
Badura 1965		60	0.50	81	0.00	61	0.03	70	0.03	43	0.13	61	0.06
Barbosa 1983		86	0.28	85	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03
Biret 1990		63	0.50	88	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.04
Blet 2003		55	0.54	42	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	65	0.04	84	0.03
Block 1995		31	0.59	28	0.00	37	0.05	32	0.18	19	0.34	29	0.25
Blumental 1952		67	0.49	3	0.07	17	0.07	40	0.12	38	0.14	44	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.68	54	0.00	20	0.08	29	0.21	24	0.31	27	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.57	62	0.00	30	0.05	31	0.18	23	0.34	28	0.25
Bunin 1987		65	0.49	37	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	43	0.14	59	0.07
Bunin 1987b		64	0.50	34	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	43	0.13	58	0.07
Chiu 1999		72	0.47	65	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.17	49	0.09
Cohen 1997		87	0.18	83	0.00	87	0.03	68	0.03	56	0.04	87	0.03
Cortot 1951		70	0.48	73	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	75	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		85	0.29	31	0.00	60	0.03	69	0.03	57	0.05	73	0.04
Czerny 1949		56	0.52	52	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.13	63	0.05	54	0.08
Czerny 1990		16	0.65	26	0.01	18	0.07	11	0.41	28	0.25	17	0.32
Duchoud 2007		20	0.62	44	0.00	27	0.09	22	0.28	15	0.38	15	0.33
Ezaki 2006		10	0.68	50	0.00	12	0.11	13	0.35	27	0.30	16	0.32
Falvay 1989		71	0.48	59	0.00	74	0.02	85	0.02	45	0.09	68	0.04
Farrell 1958		68	0.49	55	0.00	79	0.03	75	0.03	67	0.04	81	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.39	86	0.00	86	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.03
Fliere 1977		6	0.71	19	0.01	9	0.10	7	0.49	27	0.31	10	0.39
Fou 1978		28	0.60	14	0.03	26	0.09	19	0.30	30	0.25	23	0.27
Francois 1956		73	0.46	84	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	39	0.14	56	0.08
Friedman 1923		78	0.41	79	0.00	78	0.03	72	0.03	25	0.29	52	0.09
Friedman 1923b		79	0.41	60	0.00	77	0.02	87	0.02	27	0.29	55	0.08
Friedman 1930		75	0.45	56	0.00	76	0.02	86	0.02	48	0.07	74	0.04
Garcia 2007		41	0.57	89	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.11	23	0.33	35	0.19
Garcia 2007b		61	0.50	33	0.00	36	0.05	38	0.14	12	0.27	36	0.19
Gierzod 1998		14	0.65	13	0.03	16	0.07	12	0.39	31	0.25	18	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		12	0.66	49	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.29	16	0.39	13	0.34
Groot 1988		57	0.52	51	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.08	62	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.63	8	0.04	5	0.16	9	0.47	9	0.45	8	0.46
Hatto 1993		35	0.58	18	0.01	13	0.08	23	0.26	12	0.47	12	0.35
Hatto 1997		42	0.56	67	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.22	18	0.31	24	0.26
Horowitz 1949		27	0.60	46	0.00	40	0.04	34	0.16	15	0.48	22	0.28
Indjic 1988		37	0.57	29	0.00	22	0.07	24	0.25	13	0.43	14	0.33
Kapell 1951		53	0.55	63	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	77	0.04	70	0.04
Kissin 1993		5	0.72	15	0.03	7	0.10	4	0.52	9	0.53	4	0.52
Kushner 1989		2	0.72	2	0.09	4	0.14	1	0.60	6	0.54	1	0.57
Luisada 1991		1	0.75	10	0.03	2	0.21	3	0.55	3	0.54	3	0.54
Lushtak 2004		62	0.50	70	0.00	65	0.05	48	0.05	70	0.03	77	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.64	27	0.01	32	0.05	25	0.25	17	0.32	21	0.28
Magaloff 1978		24	0.61	68	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	40	0.15	46	0.12
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		46	0.56	17	0.01	29	0.06	30	0.19	27	0.31	31	0.24
Milkina 1970		17	0.65	32	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.30	28	0.29	19	0.29
Mohovich 1999		25	0.60	47	0.00	34	0.05	33	0.18	42	0.10	45	0.13
Moravec 1969		77	0.42	80	0.00	72	0.03	82	0.03	51	0.04	79	0.03
Morozova 2008		7	0.70	4	0.05	6	0.15	15	0.31	20	0.27	20	0.29
Neighaus 1950		21	0.61	75	0.00	24	0.08	14	0.33	37	0.16	33	0.23
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.51	21	0.01	46	0.04	58	0.04	22	0.30	47	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.67	7	0.04	8	0.09	5	0.50	11	0.44	7	0.47
Osinska 1989		51	0.55	72	0.00	68	0.05	55	0.05	84	0.03	67	0.04
Pachmann 1927		83	0.39	76	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	64	0.04	82	0.03
Paderewski 1930		66	0.49	36	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.02	90	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		52	0.55	30	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.11	41	0.10	48	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		29	0.60	77	0.00	33	0.05	35	0.15	27	0.36	32	0.23
Poblocka 1999		26	0.60	22	0.01	47	0.05	52	0.05	43	0.10	57	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		69	0.48	66	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		23	0.61	9	0.04	10	0.11	10	0.44	11	0.44	9	0.44
Rangell 2001		45	0.56	61	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	20	0.34	42	0.14
Richter 1976		32	0.58	16	0.02	39	0.06	43	0.11	14	0.44	34	0.22
Rosen 1989		8	0.69	5	0.04	11	0.13	8	0.49	14	0.47	6	0.48
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.55	43	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		36	0.57	58	0.00	51	0.05	46	0.05	14	0.49	38	0.16
Rosenthal 1931b		39	0.57	41	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	12	0.48	40	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		49	0.55	23	0.01	59	0.03	67	0.03	27	0.30	51	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		44	0.56	24	0.01	55	0.05	57	0.05	17	0.42	43	0.14
Rossi 2007		80	0.40	48	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	43	0.10	60	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.37	38	0.00	85	0.03	71	0.03	49	0.06	69	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		81	0.39	35	0.00	75	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.04	89	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		76	0.44	82	0.00	82	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		48	0.56	25	0.01	41	0.05	36	0.15	42	0.16	39	0.15
Shebanova 2002		22	0.61	53	0.00	35	0.05	28	0.22	23	0.31	25	0.26
Smith 1975		13	0.66	74	0.00	23	0.08	26	0.23	44	0.09	41	0.14
Sokolov 2002		15	0.65	20	0.01	19	0.07	16	0.31	21	0.39	11	0.35
Sztompka 1959		50	0.55	64	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04	72	0.04
Tomsic 1995		58	0.51	69	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	51	0.05	71	0.04
Uninsky 1932		47	0.56	71	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.14	53	0.08
Uninsky 1971		40	0.57	40	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	52	0.06	64	0.05
Wasowski 1980		33	0.58	39	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	68	0.04	66	0.04
Zak 1937		43	0.56	45	0.00	31	0.04	37	0.15	32	0.21	37	0.18
Zak 1951		34	0.58	11	0.03	14	0.08	21	0.28	28	0.21	30	0.24
Random 1		90	-0.11	57	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	34	0.24	65	0.05
Random 2		89	-0.09	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	32	0.16	75	0.04
Random 3		88	0.06	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	11	0.44	50	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).