Friedman 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.51	77	0.00	17	0.07	23	0.38	84	0.03	35	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.58	59	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.29	51	0.04	33	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.57	55	0.00	14	0.09	15	0.42	46	0.05	26	0.14
Bacha 2000		78	0.30	72	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	80	0.03	73	0.03
Badura 1965		21	0.55	32	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.23	38	0.18	18	0.20
Barbosa 1983		61	0.40	8	0.01	64	0.07	47	0.07	70	0.04	50	0.05
Biret 1990		52	0.44	29	0.00	56	0.05	62	0.05	81	0.03	69	0.04
Blet 2003		48	0.45	41	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	73	0.03	48	0.06
Block 1995		69	0.34	37	0.00	59	0.05	56	0.05	77	0.03	67	0.04
Blumental 1952		59	0.43	36	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.19	56	0.04	39	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.47	81	0.00	55	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.36	89	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.04	75	0.03
Bunin 1987		41	0.47	85	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.36	31	0.30	10	0.33
Bunin 1987b		43	0.46	64	0.00	28	0.09	25	0.36	31	0.31	9	0.33
Chiu 1999		42	0.46	26	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	73	0.03	57	0.04
Cohen 1997		85	0.18	67	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Cortot 1951		26	0.52	56	0.00	34	0.06	28	0.29	58	0.05	29	0.12
Csalog 1996		86	0.06	48	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	75	0.03	87	0.02
Czerny 1949		3	0.66	7	0.02	3	0.25	3	0.58	18	0.43	4	0.50
Czerny 1990		9	0.59	44	0.00	13	0.09	12	0.46	46	0.06	21	0.17
Duchoud 2007		53	0.44	25	0.00	54	0.04	79	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Ezaki 2006		5	0.63	27	0.00	9	0.11	9	0.48	41	0.12	16	0.24
Falvay 1989		82	0.24	73	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.05	59	0.04
Farrell 1958		47	0.45	87	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	57	0.05	49	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.45	71	0.00	41	0.04	40	0.15	46	0.06	38	0.09
Fliere 1977		15	0.58	14	0.01	22	0.07	21	0.39	78	0.03	31	0.11
Fou 1978		70	0.34	17	0.01	70	0.07	46	0.07	57	0.05	46	0.06
Francois 1956		37	0.47	52	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.15	71	0.03	44	0.07
Friedman 1923		1	0.80	2	0.30	2	0.70	1	0.78	2	0.81	1	0.79
Friedman 1923b		2	0.79	1	0.41	1	0.41	2	0.77	2	0.80	2	0.78
Friedman 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007		65	0.39	70	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	82	0.03	66	0.04
Garcia 2007b		44	0.46	39	0.00	40	0.05	44	0.12	65	0.04	45	0.07
Gierzod 1998		10	0.59	24	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.49	41	0.14	14	0.26
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.54	6	0.02	21	0.11	18	0.41	56	0.04	28	0.13
Groot 1988		67	0.37	43	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	86	0.03	70	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.59	22	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.38	63	0.04	30	0.12
Hatto 1993		20	0.55	3	0.04	24	0.11	20	0.41	28	0.19	13	0.28
Hatto 1997		14	0.58	10	0.01	12	0.08	11	0.47	24	0.25	8	0.34
Horowitz 1949		45	0.46	18	0.00	63	0.08	45	0.08	51	0.05	47	0.06
Indjic 1988		19	0.55	21	0.00	23	0.07	19	0.41	25	0.22	12	0.30
Kapell 1951		29	0.51	5	0.02	15	0.10	13	0.44	66	0.04	27	0.13
Kissin 1993		66	0.38	60	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	78	0.03	65	0.04
Kushner 1989		38	0.47	42	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	77	0.03	61	0.04
Luisada 1991		33	0.49	49	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	66	0.04	53	0.04
Lushtak 2004		24	0.53	86	0.00	37	0.07	33	0.24	66	0.04	37	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.47	12	0.01	20	0.07	31	0.26	48	0.05	32	0.11
Magaloff 1978		40	0.47	23	0.00	47	0.05	66	0.05	67	0.04	58	0.04
Magin 1975		49	0.45	28	0.00	61	0.07	48	0.07	86	0.02	60	0.04
Michalowski 1933		7	0.61	15	0.01	10	0.10	7	0.50	19	0.40	6	0.45
Milkina 1970		79	0.29	76	0.00	80	0.04	70	0.04	87	0.03	77	0.03
Mohovich 1999		58	0.43	90	0.00	51	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	83	0.03
Moravec 1969		73	0.32	19	0.00	50	0.05	64	0.05	52	0.04	52	0.04
Morozova 2008		22	0.54	47	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.28	47	0.04	34	0.11
Neighaus 1950		6	0.62	11	0.01	6	0.14	4	0.55	42	0.11	15	0.25
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.44	20	0.00	33	0.07	37	0.18	40	0.12	24	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.50	74	0.00	31	0.07	32	0.24	72	0.04	36	0.10
Osinska 1989		27	0.52	46	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.18	72	0.04	40	0.08
Pachmann 1927		77	0.30	35	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03
Paderewski 1930		32	0.50	4	0.02	18	0.08	27	0.30	27	0.20	17	0.24
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.43	69	0.00	52	0.04	78	0.04	84	0.03	74	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.32	61	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	85	0.02	76	0.03
Poblocka 1999		50	0.44	50	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.15	71	0.04	41	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		25	0.53	65	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.22	43	0.10	25	0.15
Rachmaninoff 1923		8	0.59	33	0.00	8	0.11	10	0.47	23	0.26	7	0.35
Rangell 2001		83	0.23	68	0.00	79	0.04	76	0.04	64	0.03	84	0.03
Richter 1976		71	0.33	57	0.00	69	0.05	57	0.05	60	0.04	64	0.04
Rosen 1989		28	0.51	31	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.31	46	0.08	22	0.16
Rosenthal 1930		39	0.47	40	0.00	44	0.08	41	0.15	33	0.21	20	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.32	45	0.00	74	0.04	68	0.04	73	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.32	82	0.00	73	0.04	77	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		63	0.39	58	0.00	66	0.05	50	0.05	54	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.28	62	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		62	0.40	66	0.00	71	0.05	58	0.05	70	0.04	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.22	84	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	87	0.02	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		87	0.05	78	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	80	0.03	90	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		72	0.33	34	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	81	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		12	0.58	13	0.01	16	0.07	16	0.42	45	0.09	19	0.19
Shebanova 2002		64	0.39	79	0.00	68	0.06	49	0.06	78	0.04	51	0.05
Smith 1975		18	0.57	30	0.00	19	0.09	14	0.43	53	0.05	23	0.15
Sokolov 2002		54	0.44	80	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.04	55	0.04
Sztompka 1959		4	0.64	38	0.00	4	0.22	5	0.52	16	0.42	5	0.47
Tomsic 1995		81	0.26	54	0.00	81	0.04	71	0.04	78	0.03	78	0.03
Uninsky 1932		17	0.57	9	0.01	5	0.25	6	0.51	12	0.51	3	0.51
Uninsky 1971		34	0.49	88	0.00	11	0.09	17	0.42	35	0.22	11	0.30
Wasowski 1980		55	0.44	16	0.01	48	0.05	65	0.05	76	0.04	54	0.04
Zak 1937		57	0.44	75	0.00	57	0.05	67	0.05	68	0.04	62	0.04
Zak 1951		51	0.44	53	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	73	0.04	63	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.21	63	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.00	51	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	11	0.34	42	0.08
Random 3		89	-0.02	83	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	21	0.26	43	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).