Rosenthal 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		28	0.55	51	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.22	62	0.04	33	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		29	0.55	12	0.01	15	0.08	25	0.27	43	0.07	21	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.48	13	0.01	39	0.07	38	0.17	49	0.05	35	0.09
Bacha 2000		80	0.34	79	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.03	87	0.02
Badura 1965		60	0.46	69	0.00	20	0.08	23	0.28	41	0.15	14	0.20
Barbosa 1983		85	0.25	73	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Biret 1990		34	0.54	52	0.00	45	0.04	56	0.04	79	0.04	62	0.04
Blet 2003		42	0.50	82	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	85	0.03	77	0.03
Block 1995		76	0.38	85	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	89	0.02
Blumental 1952		73	0.40	11	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.09	76	0.02	61	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.51	58	0.00	56	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.05	50	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.47	25	0.00	59	0.03	68	0.03	51	0.05	52	0.04
Bunin 1987		36	0.52	76	0.00	34	0.07	26	0.25	36	0.20	13	0.22
Bunin 1987b		37	0.52	80	0.00	35	0.08	28	0.25	36	0.22	12	0.23
Chiu 1999		87	0.23	70	0.00	85	0.02	80	0.02	65	0.04	69	0.03
Cohen 1997		86	0.24	83	0.00	83	0.02	82	0.02	48	0.06	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		20	0.59	46	0.00	27	0.07	20	0.33	57	0.05	25	0.13
Csalog 1996		62	0.46	49	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	58	0.04	76	0.03
Czerny 1949		13	0.63	15	0.00	12	0.09	8	0.56	35	0.17	11	0.31
Czerny 1990		14	0.62	30	0.00	14	0.08	9	0.50	75	0.03	28	0.12
Duchoud 2007		55	0.48	89	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.20	56	0.04	34	0.09
Ezaki 2006		23	0.58	38	0.00	18	0.09	15	0.45	52	0.05	17	0.15
Falvay 1989		48	0.49	23	0.00	32	0.06	40	0.12	64	0.05	37	0.08
Farrell 1958		59	0.47	67	0.00	60	0.03	70	0.03	61	0.05	54	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.48	36	0.00	67	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.03	79	0.03
Fliere 1977		8	0.66	45	0.00	16	0.09	12	0.47	76	0.03	26	0.12
Fou 1978		63	0.45	17	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	73	0.04	55	0.04
Francois 1956		27	0.56	50	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	73	0.03	64	0.04
Friedman 1923		82	0.32	24	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.05	65	0.04
Friedman 1923b		81	0.32	34	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	58	0.06	51	0.05
Friedman 1930		57	0.47	29	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.21	41	0.15	15	0.18
Garcia 2007		68	0.42	68	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	54	0.05	60	0.04
Garcia 2007b		83	0.29	26	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.04	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		11	0.64	86	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.40	53	0.05	22	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.67	4	0.03	8	0.16	6	0.62	24	0.30	7	0.43
Groot 1988		51	0.49	5	0.02	11	0.11	35	0.20	79	0.03	40	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.48	32	0.00	9	0.16	17	0.39	49	0.05	23	0.14
Hatto 1993		78	0.36	87	0.00	70	0.03	69	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1997		74	0.39	65	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	73	0.04	78	0.03
Horowitz 1949		41	0.50	57	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	47	0.05	57	0.04
Indjic 1988		77	0.37	88	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	76	0.03	75	0.03
Kapell 1951		12	0.64	62	0.00	25	0.09	19	0.36	64	0.04	27	0.12
Kissin 1993		25	0.56	33	0.00	22	0.07	27	0.25	85	0.03	31	0.09
Kushner 1989		9	0.65	18	0.00	24	0.09	18	0.37	61	0.05	19	0.14
Luisada 1991		70	0.41	55	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	71	0.04	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		65	0.43	90	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.22	74	0.03	38	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.67	22	0.00	7	0.13	14	0.47	14	0.38	8	0.42
Magaloff 1978		10	0.64	7	0.01	10	0.13	10	0.48	33	0.20	10	0.31
Magin 1975		31	0.55	16	0.00	46	0.04	57	0.04	66	0.04	53	0.04
Michalowski 1933		61	0.46	27	0.00	55	0.05	46	0.05	65	0.05	47	0.05
Milkina 1970		22	0.58	77	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	80	0.04	43	0.06
Mohovich 1999		30	0.55	21	0.00	28	0.06	37	0.19	83	0.03	39	0.08
Moravec 1969		19	0.59	6	0.02	26	0.10	21	0.33	13	0.43	9	0.38
Morozova 2008		43	0.50	31	0.00	23	0.07	24	0.27	77	0.03	32	0.09
Neighaus 1950		46	0.50	60	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	51	0.05	63	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		39	0.51	53	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.03	72	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.51	28	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.12	75	0.03	44	0.06
Osinska 1989		21	0.58	42	0.00	30	0.07	36	0.19	73	0.04	30	0.09
Pachmann 1927		75	0.39	71	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	47	0.06	74	0.03
Paderewski 1930		32	0.54	64	0.00	54	0.05	47	0.05	71	0.03	58	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.49	19	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.23	81	0.03	36	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.41	81	0.00	76	0.03	72	0.03	72	0.03	70	0.03
Poblocka 1999		18	0.60	59	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.09	60	0.05	41	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		24	0.57	20	0.00	13	0.08	22	0.29	54	0.04	29	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.62	3	0.05	5	0.29	5	0.62	10	0.46	5	0.53
Rangell 2001		64	0.45	41	0.00	66	0.04	59	0.04	81	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		45	0.50	14	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.14	38	0.14	20	0.14
Rosen 1989		33	0.54	63	0.00	53	0.04	54	0.04	80	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.78	2	0.07	2	0.43	2	0.83	4	0.86	2	0.84
Rosenthal 1931b		3	0.76	10	0.01	3	0.38	3	0.82	4	0.85	3	0.83
Rosenthal 1931c		1	0.87	1	0.69	1	0.68	1	0.89	4	0.90	1	0.89
Rosenthal 1931d		4	0.76	9	0.01	4	0.33	4	0.81	4	0.82	4	0.81
Rossi 2007		84	0.29	43	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	61	0.04	68	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		79	0.35	61	0.00	87	0.03	67	0.03	63	0.04	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.40	47	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	72	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		67	0.43	72	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.05	59	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		17	0.60	56	0.00	21	0.08	13	0.47	51	0.06	16	0.17
Shebanova 2002		53	0.48	40	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.03	80	0.03
Smith 1975		16	0.61	8	0.01	17	0.08	11	0.48	67	0.04	18	0.14
Sokolov 2002		7	0.67	37	0.00	6	0.24	7	0.61	26	0.36	6	0.47
Sztompka 1959		26	0.56	74	0.00	38	0.07	29	0.24	51	0.07	24	0.13
Tomsic 1995		66	0.43	84	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03
Uninsky 1932		44	0.50	66	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	49	0.06	49	0.05
Uninsky 1971		35	0.53	48	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	49	0.06	48	0.05
Wasowski 1980		69	0.42	78	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.04	67	0.03
Zak 1937		47	0.49	35	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.04	56	0.04
Zak 1951		50	0.49	44	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.05	46	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.10	54	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	21	0.34	45	0.06
Random 2		88	-0.04	39	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.23	42	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.10	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	61	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).