Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.73	1	0.19	1	0.19	10	0.53	10	0.47	8	0.50
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.59	61	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	44	0.07	72	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.65	67	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.24	37	0.19	34	0.21
Bacha 2000		21	0.68	7	0.04	14	0.14	16	0.43	3	0.53	10	0.48
Badura 1965		73	0.51	74	0.00	68	0.04	65	0.04	36	0.18	62	0.08
Barbosa 1983		81	0.46	50	0.00	59	0.03	78	0.03	42	0.13	70	0.06
Biret 1990		16	0.71	25	0.01	20	0.10	20	0.40	19	0.33	22	0.36
Blet 2003		30	0.65	33	0.00	21	0.06	25	0.26	15	0.36	27	0.31
Block 1995		35	0.63	18	0.01	28	0.07	26	0.26	10	0.40	26	0.32
Blumental 1952		76	0.49	53	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.17	23	0.21	36	0.19
Boshniakovich 1969		23	0.66	32	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.24	29	0.26	29	0.25
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.66	29	0.00	35	0.08	28	0.26	18	0.39	24	0.32
Bunin 1987		86	0.40	89	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	83	0.04
Bunin 1987b		87	0.40	86	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.05	77	0.04
Chiu 1999		47	0.58	31	0.00	30	0.07	27	0.26	16	0.45	23	0.34
Cohen 1997		83	0.42	16	0.01	56	0.03	75	0.03	18	0.30	55	0.09
Cortot 1951		62	0.53	59	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	68	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		63	0.53	36	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	32	0.20	60	0.08
Czerny 1949		43	0.59	62	0.00	22	0.07	32	0.24	75	0.04	50	0.10
Czerny 1990		15	0.71	8	0.03	7	0.11	12	0.49	14	0.46	15	0.47
Duchoud 2007		53	0.57	47	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	40	0.15	61	0.08
Ezaki 2006		12	0.72	20	0.01	16	0.15	11	0.51	11	0.44	13	0.47
Falvay 1989		34	0.63	40	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	33	0.28	48	0.11
Farrell 1958		36	0.63	70	0.00	50	0.08	45	0.08	34	0.20	45	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.55	37	0.00	46	0.04	61	0.04	50	0.05	80	0.04
Fliere 1977		7	0.75	15	0.01	13	0.15	3	0.56	20	0.39	14	0.47
Fou 1978		17	0.70	5	0.04	12	0.13	13	0.49	7	0.49	9	0.49
Francois 1956		26	0.66	54	0.00	15	0.13	17	0.43	12	0.47	17	0.45
Friedman 1923		79	0.47	83	0.00	71	0.05	49	0.05	13	0.46	40	0.15
Friedman 1923b		77	0.47	43	0.00	70	0.04	59	0.04	14	0.46	42	0.14
Friedman 1930		70	0.51	41	0.00	66	0.08	46	0.08	26	0.31	38	0.16
Garcia 2007		68	0.52	68	0.00	53	0.03	72	0.03	44	0.09	73	0.05
Garcia 2007b		67	0.53	45	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.11	9	0.34	37	0.19
Gierzod 1998		6	0.75	27	0.01	10	0.12	7	0.55	10	0.50	7	0.52
Gornostaeva 1994		1	0.78	2	0.17	2	0.19	1	0.64	2	0.70	1	0.67
Groot 1988		33	0.63	17	0.01	33	0.07	33	0.23	35	0.26	30	0.24
Harasiewicz 1955		50	0.57	64	0.00	26	0.06	34	0.22	44	0.09	43	0.14
Hatto 1993		80	0.46	78	0.00	65	0.06	47	0.06	32	0.18	53	0.10
Hatto 1997		74	0.50	11	0.02	41	0.05	41	0.12	38	0.12	47	0.12
Horowitz 1949		69	0.52	48	0.00	81	0.04	63	0.04	49	0.05	78	0.04
Indjic 1988		78	0.47	56	0.00	64	0.05	52	0.05	37	0.14	59	0.08
Kapell 1951		31	0.65	10	0.02	44	0.05	44	0.09	49	0.05	65	0.07
Kissin 1993		13	0.72	75	0.00	18	0.17	18	0.42	16	0.41	19	0.41
Kushner 1989		2	0.77	13	0.01	5	0.15	6	0.56	5	0.54	4	0.55
Luisada 1991		14	0.72	6	0.04	8	0.11	8	0.54	2	0.56	3	0.55
Lushtak 2004		55	0.56	80	0.00	63	0.05	50	0.05	62	0.04	82	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.68	65	0.00	34	0.07	35	0.20	23	0.26	31	0.23
Magaloff 1978		19	0.69	30	0.00	23	0.06	22	0.31	21	0.34	25	0.32
Magin 1975		18	0.69	14	0.01	17	0.14	14	0.47	8	0.49	11	0.48
Michalowski 1933		64	0.53	71	0.00	51	0.04	69	0.04	41	0.16	58	0.08
Milkina 1970		5	0.76	9	0.02	6	0.11	5	0.56	7	0.53	6	0.54
Mohovich 1999		4	0.76	12	0.01	9	0.13	4	0.56	7	0.54	5	0.55
Moravec 1969		58	0.55	82	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	39	0.21	56	0.08
Morozova 2008		40	0.61	24	0.01	25	0.06	29	0.24	30	0.22	32	0.23
Neighaus 1950		10	0.73	22	0.01	11	0.13	9	0.54	13	0.42	12	0.48
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.50	58	0.00	83	0.04	60	0.04	87	0.03	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.68	38	0.00	27	0.08	21	0.34	30	0.25	28	0.29
Osinska 1989		3	0.77	3	0.13	3	0.29	2	0.62	3	0.64	2	0.63
Pachmann 1927		71	0.51	44	0.00	80	0.03	73	0.03	35	0.13	68	0.06
Paderewski 1930		37	0.62	85	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.15	23	0.25	35	0.19
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.58	87	0.00	39	0.05	37	0.15	66	0.04	57	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		38	0.62	57	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	23	0.39	39	0.15
Poblocka 1999		25	0.66	60	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	45	0.08	67	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.65	39	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.31	11	0.43	21	0.37
Rachmaninoff 1923		65	0.53	52	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	49	0.05	76	0.04
Rangell 2001		28	0.65	21	0.01	29	0.06	24	0.29	5	0.49	20	0.38
Richter 1976		84	0.41	55	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	72	0.03	85	0.03
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		60	0.54	88	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		66	0.53	73	0.00	77	0.02	88	0.02	29	0.23	66	0.07
Rosenthal 1931b		61	0.54	72	0.00	76	0.03	86	0.03	29	0.23	63	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.56	79	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	32	0.23	64	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		52	0.57	46	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	19	0.32	52	0.10
Rossi 2007		82	0.46	42	0.00	45	0.04	56	0.04	9	0.47	41	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.41	49	0.00	84	0.04	64	0.04	48	0.06	71	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		56	0.55	26	0.01	67	0.05	51	0.05	25	0.38	44	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.59	28	0.01	43	0.06	40	0.12	24	0.38	33	0.21
Schilhawsky 1960		72	0.51	66	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	63	0.04	86	0.03
Shebanova 2002		8	0.73	69	0.00	19	0.14	19	0.42	16	0.45	18	0.43
Smith 1975		11	0.73	4	0.08	4	0.16	15	0.47	12	0.46	16	0.46
Sokolov 2002		49	0.57	77	0.00	69	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.04
Sztompka 1959		24	0.66	63	0.00	47	0.04	54	0.04	47	0.08	69	0.06
Tomsic 1995		39	0.61	51	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	21	0.39	46	0.12
Uninsky 1932		57	0.55	34	0.00	57	0.03	81	0.03	64	0.05	81	0.04
Uninsky 1971		51	0.57	23	0.01	58	0.03	71	0.03	61	0.05	79	0.04
Wasowski 1980		48	0.58	76	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.05	74	0.04
Zak 1937		41	0.61	19	0.01	42	0.05	43	0.11	46	0.07	54	0.09
Zak 1951		42	0.60	35	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.15	49	0.07	49	0.10
Random 1		90	-0.20	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.12	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	73	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.07	84	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	9	0.46	51	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).