Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		39	0.49	15	0.01	40	0.08	33	0.22	46	0.05	38	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.48	69	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.18	66	0.03	48	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.50	74	0.00	32	0.07	25	0.29	80	0.03	40	0.09
Bacha 2000		25	0.54	56	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.28	32	0.19	16	0.23
Badura 1965		65	0.38	61	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.16	74	0.04	46	0.08
Barbosa 1983		78	0.27	7	0.04	11	0.11	29	0.26	72	0.04	37	0.10
Biret 1990		10	0.60	55	0.00	29	0.08	12	0.43	48	0.06	23	0.16
Blet 2003		57	0.43	9	0.03	21	0.07	32	0.22	86	0.03	45	0.08
Block 1995		17	0.57	2	0.14	2	0.21	6	0.46	5	0.45	2	0.45
Blumental 1952		83	0.25	71	0.00	73	0.03	74	0.03	59	0.04	81	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.59	6	0.04	6	0.08	8	0.45	25	0.28	7	0.35
Brailowsky 1960		28	0.54	83	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.26	30	0.28	12	0.27
Bunin 1987		70	0.36	48	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	62	0.04	82	0.03
Bunin 1987b		71	0.36	80	0.00	81	0.03	86	0.03	60	0.04	72	0.03
Chiu 1999		67	0.37	21	0.01	22	0.07	17	0.38	40	0.16	15	0.25
Cohen 1997		81	0.25	35	0.00	63	0.03	72	0.03	41	0.08	54	0.05
Cortot 1951		54	0.44	46	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.05	66	0.04
Csalog 1996		37	0.50	85	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	40	0.14	44	0.08
Czerny 1949		74	0.35	73	0.00	74	0.03	69	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1990		41	0.49	38	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Duchoud 2007		14	0.58	3	0.10	4	0.10	9	0.44	42	0.12	18	0.23
Ezaki 2006		26	0.54	5	0.05	10	0.09	10	0.44	72	0.03	31	0.11
Falvay 1989		33	0.52	27	0.00	33	0.06	38	0.17	39	0.18	21	0.17
Farrell 1958		45	0.48	50	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.09	36	0.13	32	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		68	0.36	67	0.00	85	0.04	56	0.04	67	0.04	63	0.04
Fliere 1977		12	0.59	8	0.04	13	0.10	7	0.46	65	0.04	25	0.14
Fou 1978		30	0.54	11	0.03	5	0.09	4	0.50	33	0.19	10	0.31
Francois 1956		49	0.47	75	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	68	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1923		86	0.14	60	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		87	0.14	49	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1930		85	0.23	47	0.00	84	0.03	64	0.03	76	0.04	77	0.03
Garcia 2007		61	0.39	88	0.00	68	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		76	0.33	68	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Gierzod 1998		31	0.53	64	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	57	0.04	65	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.64	63	0.00	15	0.08	18	0.37	27	0.29	8	0.33
Groot 1988		16	0.58	13	0.02	12	0.08	16	0.39	34	0.26	9	0.32
Harasiewicz 1955		58	0.42	19	0.01	16	0.10	21	0.34	59	0.04	30	0.12
Hatto 1993		84	0.24	45	0.00	55	0.04	54	0.04	78	0.03	85	0.03
Hatto 1997		79	0.26	31	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	66	0.04	49	0.06
Horowitz 1949		43	0.48	30	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	63	0.04	58	0.04
Indjic 1988		82	0.25	76	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.04
Kapell 1951		20	0.56	12	0.02	49	0.05	49	0.05	68	0.04	57	0.04
Kissin 1993		23	0.56	40	0.00	24	0.06	23	0.33	56	0.05	27	0.13
Kushner 1989		7	0.63	4	0.06	3	0.10	2	0.53	32	0.24	5	0.36
Luisada 1991		51	0.46	53	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.13	65	0.04	47	0.07
Lushtak 2004		69	0.36	25	0.01	42	0.05	42	0.10	82	0.03	52	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.65	24	0.01	17	0.12	24	0.33	19	0.29	11	0.31
Magaloff 1978		13	0.58	36	0.00	27	0.05	28	0.27	34	0.18	19	0.22
Magin 1975		22	0.56	52	0.00	23	0.07	20	0.34	45	0.06	26	0.14
Michalowski 1933		64	0.38	34	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.04	73	0.03
Milkina 1970		1	0.70	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.55	16	0.39	1	0.46
Mohovich 1999		4	0.64	18	0.01	9	0.07	3	0.51	55	0.05	22	0.16
Moravec 1969		55	0.44	51	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	55	0.04	67	0.03
Morozova 2008		72	0.36	29	0.00	61	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03
Neighaus 1950		15	0.58	14	0.02	30	0.10	22	0.34	65	0.04	29	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.39	32	0.00	78	0.03	71	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.60	37	0.00	14	0.09	11	0.44	47	0.05	24	0.15
Osinska 1989		21	0.56	16	0.01	20	0.07	14	0.39	36	0.17	14	0.26
Pachmann 1927		56	0.43	59	0.00	59	0.03	70	0.03	46	0.06	60	0.04
Paderewski 1930		18	0.57	10	0.03	18	0.08	31	0.26	26	0.21	17	0.23
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.39	65	0.00	65	0.04	53	0.04	86	0.02	68	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		6	0.63	42	0.00	7	0.08	15	0.39	7	0.47	3	0.43
Poblocka 1999		24	0.56	39	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.17	62	0.04	42	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.45	58	0.00	71	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		73	0.36	89	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.03
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		60	0.40	70	0.00	66	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04
Rosen 1989		2	0.65	17	0.01	8	0.07	5	0.49	24	0.29	4	0.38
Rosenthal 1930		53	0.45	57	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	59	0.04	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		38	0.50	82	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	34	0.18	43	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		36	0.50	66	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	32	0.20	41	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		35	0.50	90	0.00	69	0.03	84	0.03	44	0.07	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		29	0.54	62	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	27	0.24	33	0.11
Rossi 2007		80	0.25	81	0.00	67	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.06	51	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.30	43	0.00	62	0.03	76	0.03	46	0.06	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.48	23	0.01	46	0.05	46	0.05	37	0.24	34	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.48	26	0.01	38	0.07	35	0.19	40	0.17	20	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		75	0.35	84	0.00	83	0.04	58	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Shebanova 2002		8	0.60	22	0.01	19	0.08	13	0.42	35	0.18	13	0.27
Smith 1975		27	0.54	72	0.00	26	0.07	27	0.28	46	0.05	28	0.12
Sokolov 2002		32	0.53	41	0.00	58	0.03	65	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03
Sztompka 1959		40	0.49	33	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.04
Tomsic 1995		19	0.57	78	0.00	25	0.06	19	0.35	22	0.36	6	0.35
Uninsky 1932		66	0.37	77	0.00	80	0.03	66	0.03	62	0.05	64	0.04
Uninsky 1971		59	0.42	44	0.00	79	0.03	67	0.03	75	0.04	74	0.03
Wasowski 1980		48	0.47	20	0.01	45	0.05	47	0.05	60	0.05	50	0.05
Zak 1937		42	0.49	86	0.00	37	0.05	36	0.19	60	0.05	35	0.10
Zak 1951		50	0.46	28	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.21	66	0.05	36	0.10
Random 1		90	-0.11	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	33	0.25	53	0.05
Random 2		89	-0.06	54	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	51	0.04	90	0.02
Random 3		88	0.10	79	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	4	0.52	39	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).