Zak 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.73	41	0.00	7	0.15	13	0.45	23	0.38	19	0.41
Anderszewski 2003		71	0.51	14	0.00	65	0.04	78	0.04	75	0.03	85	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.66	84	0.00	18	0.09	19	0.40	24	0.36	21	0.38
Bacha 2000		54	0.58	45	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.19	10	0.45	31	0.29
Badura 1965		58	0.57	70	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	26	0.34	54	0.13
Barbosa 1983		49	0.60	71	0.00	50	0.05	62	0.05	13	0.39	51	0.14
Biret 1990		24	0.66	12	0.00	25	0.07	21	0.39	15	0.35	23	0.37
Blet 2003		34	0.64	9	0.00	57	0.06	54	0.06	43	0.09	63	0.07
Block 1995		74	0.49	52	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	43	0.10	66	0.06
Blumental 1952		66	0.55	31	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	25	0.20	61	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		25	0.66	3	0.00	27	0.07	23	0.33	7	0.57	15	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.60	72	0.00	34	0.04	41	0.15	16	0.39	34	0.24
Bunin 1987		40	0.61	24	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	29	0.30	55	0.13
Bunin 1987b		43	0.61	62	0.00	54	0.05	64	0.05	27	0.33	53	0.13
Chiu 1999		20	0.68	46	0.00	14	0.09	15	0.45	3	0.61	7	0.52
Cohen 1997		86	0.33	73	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	46	0.06	76	0.04
Cortot 1951		59	0.57	85	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	51	0.05	79	0.04
Csalog 1996		64	0.56	20	0.00	48	0.06	58	0.06	5	0.54	42	0.18
Czerny 1949		30	0.64	34	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.20	25	0.31	33	0.25
Czerny 1990		14	0.69	74	0.00	21	0.07	27	0.27	33	0.18	36	0.22
Duchoud 2007		62	0.56	4	0.00	67	0.05	65	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.05
Ezaki 2006		9	0.72	28	0.00	13	0.11	18	0.40	18	0.37	20	0.38
Falvay 1989		27	0.65	6	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	29	0.35	49	0.14
Farrell 1958		38	0.63	25	0.00	49	0.05	63	0.05	23	0.26	56	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.52	75	0.00	74	0.04	75	0.04	51	0.05	74	0.04
Fliere 1977		2	0.76	47	0.00	2	0.19	3	0.64	4	0.54	5	0.59
Fou 1978		12	0.70	48	0.00	16	0.08	17	0.42	11	0.42	16	0.42
Francois 1956		37	0.63	49	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	24	0.35	47	0.16
Friedman 1923		84	0.36	32	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.05	81	0.04
Friedman 1923b		83	0.37	63	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.05	77	0.04
Friedman 1930		80	0.44	36	0.00	76	0.04	68	0.04	67	0.05	73	0.04
Garcia 2007		73	0.50	86	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	36	0.19	59	0.09
Garcia 2007b		82	0.38	8	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	36	0.13	67	0.06
Gierzod 1998		11	0.70	37	0.00	17	0.08	14	0.45	13	0.45	14	0.45
Gornostaeva 1994		68	0.55	64	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	74	0.03	88	0.03
Groot 1988		17	0.68	11	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.46	16	0.48	12	0.47
Harasiewicz 1955		35	0.64	13	0.00	11	0.10	7	0.54	4	0.48	8	0.51
Hatto 1993		65	0.55	18	0.00	30	0.07	28	0.27	14	0.38	29	0.32
Hatto 1997		51	0.59	16	0.00	31	0.05	30	0.24	15	0.35	32	0.29
Horowitz 1949		4	0.73	76	0.00	3	0.20	5	0.57	1	0.67	2	0.62
Indjic 1988		55	0.58	53	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.27	14	0.42	25	0.34
Kapell 1951		28	0.65	22	0.00	37	0.04	37	0.17	42	0.11	50	0.14
Kissin 1993		3	0.74	50	0.00	6	0.14	4	0.61	6	0.64	3	0.62
Kushner 1989		22	0.67	51	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.17	39	0.15	45	0.16
Luisada 1991		18	0.68	38	0.00	5	0.18	11	0.46	14	0.48	11	0.47
Lushtak 2004		10	0.71	54	0.00	12	0.11	8	0.50	8	0.43	13	0.46
Malcuzynski 1961		56	0.57	55	0.00	60	0.07	48	0.07	45	0.06	64	0.06
Magaloff 1978		39	0.62	77	0.00	35	0.05	42	0.11	32	0.23	43	0.16
Magin 1975		63	0.56	56	0.00	33	0.05	32	0.21	37	0.15	40	0.18
Michalowski 1933		85	0.35	87	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	83	0.03
Milkina 1970		16	0.68	17	0.00	9	0.12	10	0.47	11	0.51	9	0.49
Mohovich 1999		5	0.73	29	0.00	8	0.15	9	0.47	14	0.51	10	0.49
Moravec 1969		67	0.55	57	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	31	0.27	57	0.10
Morozova 2008		21	0.67	58	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.36	11	0.34	24	0.35
Neighaus 1950		6	0.73	5	0.00	4	0.19	2	0.64	4	0.58	4	0.61
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.60	35	0.00	40	0.05	36	0.18	6	0.50	30	0.30
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.66	42	0.00	28	0.09	16	0.43	20	0.39	17	0.41
Osinska 1989		31	0.64	59	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.15	38	0.16	48	0.15
Pachmann 1927		46	0.60	15	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	4	0.56	41	0.18
Paderewski 1930		72	0.50	78	0.00	75	0.04	74	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		15	0.68	39	0.00	24	0.06	24	0.31	19	0.35	27	0.33
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.56	65	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	18	0.42	44	0.16
Poblocka 1999		36	0.64	30	0.00	41	0.06	33	0.21	39	0.15	38	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		69	0.53	66	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	82	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.64	60	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.28	15	0.39	28	0.33
Rangell 2001		76	0.49	23	0.00	68	0.05	60	0.05	36	0.19	58	0.10
Richter 1976		60	0.57	67	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.11	12	0.45	35	0.22
Rosen 1989		44	0.61	33	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	43	0.11	60	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.49	7	0.00	77	0.04	70	0.04	51	0.05	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.43	61	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.44	43	0.00	80	0.03	86	0.03	46	0.05	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.46	88	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	46	0.05	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.45	68	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	59	0.05	78	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.29	89	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	65	0.04	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.57	2	0.00	36	0.04	45	0.08	9	0.40	39	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.65	79	0.00	19	0.08	31	0.22	13	0.53	26	0.34
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.70	80	0.00	23	0.07	29	0.26	12	0.53	22	0.37
Schilhawsky 1960		19	0.68	26	0.00	20	0.07	20	0.39	19	0.44	18	0.41
Shebanova 2002		8	0.72	21	0.00	10	0.15	6	0.56	10	0.55	6	0.55
Smith 1975		42	0.61	81	0.00	56	0.05	61	0.05	63	0.04	71	0.04
Sokolov 2002		41	0.61	69	0.00	46	0.06	57	0.06	38	0.27	52	0.13
Sztompka 1959		52	0.58	82	0.00	63	0.08	44	0.08	58	0.06	62	0.07
Tomsic 1995		32	0.64	19	0.00	51	0.06	55	0.06	16	0.45	46	0.16
Uninsky 1932		53	0.58	40	0.00	62	0.06	56	0.06	72	0.04	68	0.05
Uninsky 1971		47	0.60	27	0.00	58	0.07	49	0.07	68	0.05	65	0.06
Wasowski 1980		45	0.60	44	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.16	25	0.21	37	0.18
Zak 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Zak 1951		1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Random 1		89	-0.11	10	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	46	0.06	87	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.11	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	50	0.04	86	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.17	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).