Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.70	44	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.37	26	0.33	27	0.35
Anderszewski 2003		42	0.62	5	0.06	8	0.10	10	0.44	7	0.49	9	0.46
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.63	37	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.40	17	0.44	16	0.42
Bacha 2000		65	0.53	84	0.00	58	0.04	74	0.04	29	0.22	57	0.09
Badura 1965		79	0.46	45	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	52	0.05	80	0.04
Barbosa 1983		76	0.47	40	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	20	0.29	52	0.11
Biret 1990		11	0.70	25	0.01	11	0.11	11	0.43	4	0.49	11	0.46
Blet 2003		17	0.69	46	0.00	31	0.09	24	0.30	7	0.46	24	0.37
Block 1995		78	0.47	35	0.00	73	0.04	78	0.04	55	0.04	81	0.04
Blumental 1952		68	0.52	28	0.00	19	0.09	31	0.27	3	0.47	26	0.36
Boshniakovich 1969		61	0.54	76	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.04	86	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.52	62	0.00	79	0.05	54	0.05	44	0.10	62	0.07
Bunin 1987		27	0.65	68	0.00	35	0.08	32	0.27	9	0.50	25	0.37
Bunin 1987b		28	0.65	87	0.00	34	0.08	29	0.28	8	0.51	19	0.38
Chiu 1999		83	0.41	69	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	48	0.06	68	0.05
Cohen 1997		86	0.31	88	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	32	0.15	64	0.07
Cortot 1951		4	0.75	41	0.00	5	0.15	6	0.47	2	0.69	2	0.57
Csalog 1996		25	0.65	22	0.01	46	0.04	63	0.04	3	0.56	42	0.15
Czerny 1949		12	0.70	20	0.01	9	0.10	5	0.47	8	0.53	6	0.50
Czerny 1990		6	0.73	9	0.02	10	0.10	7	0.47	12	0.50	8	0.48
Duchoud 2007		30	0.65	50	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.20	8	0.42	32	0.29
Ezaki 2006		23	0.67	18	0.01	27	0.06	20	0.35	22	0.33	28	0.34
Falvay 1989		66	0.52	56	0.00	80	0.05	46	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.05
Farrell 1958		52	0.57	57	0.00	59	0.04	75	0.04	45	0.07	70	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		2	0.78	2	0.19	2	0.31	4	0.50	1	0.73	1	0.60
Fliere 1977		7	0.72	19	0.01	28	0.07	23	0.30	38	0.18	34	0.23
Fou 1978		72	0.50	63	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Francois 1956		24	0.66	30	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	27	0.31	40	0.16
Friedman 1923		85	0.36	80	0.00	66	0.05	50	0.05	23	0.31	51	0.12
Friedman 1923b		84	0.37	85	0.00	65	0.05	48	0.05	21	0.34	48	0.13
Friedman 1930		69	0.51	67	0.00	48	0.04	66	0.04	13	0.44	46	0.13
Garcia 2007		63	0.54	58	0.00	56	0.07	45	0.07	10	0.46	37	0.18
Garcia 2007b		80	0.45	59	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	11	0.31	50	0.12
Gierzod 1998		9	0.71	81	0.00	21	0.08	19	0.37	15	0.42	17	0.39
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.60	53	0.00	71	0.04	61	0.04	50	0.05	82	0.04
Groot 1988		44	0.61	34	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	43	0.10	67	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		57	0.55	6	0.04	12	0.08	13	0.40	19	0.37	21	0.38
Hatto 1993		70	0.51	72	0.00	33	0.07	38	0.15	18	0.29	35	0.21
Hatto 1997		54	0.57	61	0.00	15	0.07	27	0.28	13	0.40	29	0.33
Horowitz 1949		59	0.55	70	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	55	0.04	78	0.04
Indjic 1988		64	0.53	82	0.00	32	0.07	36	0.16	16	0.36	33	0.24
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		49	0.58	78	0.00	72	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.04
Kushner 1989		20	0.68	65	0.00	40	0.07	35	0.17	37	0.17	38	0.17
Luisada 1991		48	0.58	52	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.13	61	0.07
Lushtak 2004		41	0.63	10	0.02	7	0.10	8	0.46	4	0.46	10	0.46
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.64	48	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	39	0.12	60	0.08
Magaloff 1978		58	0.55	79	0.00	78	0.04	60	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.04
Magin 1975		60	0.55	54	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	59	0.04	75	0.04
Michalowski 1933		43	0.62	77	0.00	17	0.08	12	0.41	10	0.48	13	0.44
Milkina 1970		39	0.63	16	0.01	62	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.04	76	0.04
Mohovich 1999		18	0.69	21	0.01	26	0.06	26	0.28	24	0.36	31	0.32
Moravec 1969		32	0.64	8	0.02	52	0.05	52	0.05	6	0.50	39	0.16
Morozova 2008		55	0.56	38	0.00	50	0.04	71	0.04	44	0.07	72	0.05
Neighaus 1950		38	0.63	39	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.20	59	0.05	56	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		33	0.64	31	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	7	0.47	43	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.68	47	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.34	15	0.40	23	0.37
Osinska 1989		16	0.69	36	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.28	21	0.37	30	0.32
Pachmann 1927		81	0.44	73	0.00	87	0.04	70	0.04	45	0.06	71	0.05
Paderewski 1930		15	0.70	13	0.01	29	0.07	28	0.28	2	0.49	22	0.37
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.59	60	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.15	24	0.27	36	0.20
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.48	64	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.05	74	0.04
Poblocka 1999		1	0.80	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.53	1	0.58	3	0.55
Rabcewiczowa 1932		10	0.71	23	0.01	13	0.08	15	0.39	3	0.58	7	0.48
Rachmaninoff 1923		50	0.57	24	0.01	51	0.04	56	0.04	36	0.16	59	0.08
Rangell 2001		56	0.56	7	0.03	63	0.04	68	0.04	49	0.05	83	0.04
Richter 1976		51	0.57	33	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	15	0.43	41	0.15
Rosen 1989		31	0.65	26	0.01	45	0.05	49	0.05	44	0.09	63	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		34	0.64	49	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	19	0.36	49	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.50	83	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	38	0.14	66	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.47	75	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	55	0.05	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		45	0.60	51	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	29	0.28	53	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.49	90	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.05	88	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.29	66	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	30	0.21	58	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.42	12	0.01	84	0.02	87	0.02	41	0.16	65	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		71	0.51	4	0.08	14	0.08	41	0.11	43	0.11	54	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		62	0.54	17	0.01	43	0.04	43	0.08	44	0.12	55	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.74	42	0.00	4	0.13	3	0.51	7	0.51	5	0.51
Shebanova 2002		29	0.65	43	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.13	42	0.13	47	0.13
Smith 1975		19	0.68	14	0.01	25	0.07	16	0.37	10	0.50	14	0.43
Sokolov 2002		14	0.70	15	0.01	23	0.07	17	0.37	7	0.48	15	0.42
Sztompka 1959		3	0.75	3	0.11	3	0.28	2	0.51	4	0.56	4	0.53
Tomsic 1995		53	0.57	29	0.00	76	0.05	47	0.05	58	0.04	77	0.04
Uninsky 1932		37	0.64	32	0.00	18	0.07	22	0.31	16	0.47	20	0.38
Uninsky 1971		8	0.72	27	0.00	6	0.16	9	0.44	12	0.47	12	0.45
Wasowski 1980		22	0.67	11	0.02	24	0.05	25	0.29	1	0.51	18	0.38
Zak 1937		26	0.65	71	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	37	0.17	44	0.14
Zak 1951		35	0.64	55	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.14	39	0.13	45	0.13
Random 1		90	-0.22	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.12	86	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	68	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.05	74	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	53	0.05	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).