Uninsky 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.71	38	0.00	5	0.13	4	0.57	22	0.39	10	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		58	0.51	52	0.00	48	0.05	67	0.05	81	0.03	69	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		36	0.58	25	0.00	22	0.09	21	0.41	29	0.26	25	0.33
Bacha 2000		76	0.37	71	0.00	70	0.05	58	0.05	75	0.04	64	0.04
Badura 1965		9	0.67	9	0.01	18	0.11	15	0.48	8	0.45	11	0.46
Barbosa 1983		56	0.53	23	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	30	0.22	42	0.10
Biret 1990		52	0.54	29	0.00	56	0.05	66	0.05	61	0.05	62	0.05
Blet 2003		6	0.69	46	0.00	20	0.11	13	0.50	12	0.39	13	0.44
Block 1995		64	0.48	64	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	54	0.04	50	0.07
Blumental 1952		47	0.55	50	0.00	31	0.07	34	0.22	17	0.25	32	0.23
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.62	12	0.01	39	0.09	37	0.21	30	0.24	33	0.22
Brailowsky 1960		71	0.41	45	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.03	75	0.03
Bunin 1987		21	0.62	51	0.00	25	0.07	24	0.40	12	0.46	15	0.43
Bunin 1987b		24	0.62	90	0.00	24	0.06	23	0.41	12	0.46	14	0.43
Chiu 1999		59	0.50	70	0.00	65	0.07	47	0.07	66	0.04	56	0.05
Cohen 1997		87	0.11	87	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Cortot 1951		7	0.68	78	0.00	17	0.11	11	0.52	6	0.55	6	0.53
Csalog 1996		81	0.33	49	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	64	0.04	68	0.04
Czerny 1949		2	0.73	6	0.01	3	0.19	3	0.58	12	0.47	7	0.52
Czerny 1990		5	0.70	47	0.00	19	0.12	9	0.54	25	0.27	18	0.38
Duchoud 2007		33	0.58	58	0.00	37	0.06	30	0.29	24	0.34	27	0.31
Ezaki 2006		12	0.66	69	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.40	44	0.08	35	0.18
Falvay 1989		80	0.35	81	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	85	0.02
Farrell 1958		69	0.45	62	0.00	69	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	57	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		28	0.59	43	0.00	15	0.09	29	0.29	8	0.41	23	0.34
Fliere 1977		16	0.63	66	0.00	38	0.09	31	0.26	62	0.04	41	0.10
Fou 1978		68	0.45	85	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	84	0.03	79	0.03
Francois 1956		55	0.53	42	0.00	61	0.06	50	0.06	49	0.05	63	0.05
Friedman 1923		44	0.56	63	0.00	8	0.12	10	0.53	3	0.64	4	0.58
Friedman 1923b		43	0.56	19	0.00	7	0.13	8	0.54	3	0.64	3	0.59
Friedman 1930		41	0.57	11	0.01	13	0.12	12	0.51	6	0.51	8	0.51
Garcia 2007		34	0.58	75	0.00	46	0.06	55	0.06	17	0.41	36	0.16
Garcia 2007b		61	0.49	65	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	13	0.26	40	0.13
Gierzod 1998		23	0.62	16	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.45	35	0.23	26	0.32
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.53	22	0.00	63	0.06	53	0.06	68	0.03	72	0.04
Groot 1988		66	0.47	33	0.00	67	0.06	51	0.06	87	0.03	74	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		10	0.66	20	0.00	10	0.12	6	0.56	17	0.38	12	0.46
Hatto 1993		67	0.46	61	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.18	43	0.09	39	0.13
Hatto 1997		62	0.49	67	0.00	23	0.08	33	0.23	31	0.18	34	0.20
Horowitz 1949		26	0.60	2	0.01	34	0.06	35	0.21	28	0.35	29	0.27
Indjic 1988		65	0.48	74	0.00	32	0.07	38	0.19	41	0.12	37	0.15
Kapell 1951		15	0.64	10	0.01	14	0.08	16	0.47	22	0.31	17	0.38
Kissin 1993		40	0.57	21	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	68	0.04	67	0.04
Kushner 1989		29	0.59	56	0.00	53	0.05	60	0.05	84	0.03	66	0.04
Luisada 1991		46	0.55	54	0.00	60	0.06	56	0.06	63	0.04	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		51	0.54	60	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.15	55	0.05	45	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.60	8	0.01	6	0.12	27	0.37	18	0.31	22	0.34
Magaloff 1978		72	0.41	28	0.00	71	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Magin 1975		45	0.56	41	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	53	0.05	46	0.08
Michalowski 1933		13	0.65	32	0.00	4	0.13	5	0.57	7	0.49	5	0.53
Milkina 1970		63	0.49	72	0.00	66	0.06	52	0.06	53	0.05	59	0.05
Mohovich 1999		30	0.58	14	0.01	54	0.05	63	0.05	59	0.05	61	0.05
Moravec 1969		57	0.52	15	0.00	49	0.04	68	0.04	45	0.08	51	0.06
Morozova 2008		19	0.63	73	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.26	55	0.04	43	0.10
Neighaus 1950		25	0.61	57	0.00	12	0.09	14	0.49	40	0.12	31	0.24
Niedzielski 1931		37	0.58	18	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.21	20	0.30	30	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.54	35	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.19	42	0.10	38	0.14
Osinska 1989		38	0.58	79	0.00	62	0.08	45	0.08	80	0.03	55	0.05
Pachmann 1927		77	0.37	40	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03
Paderewski 1930		50	0.54	34	0.00	55	0.05	65	0.05	42	0.11	48	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.66	39	0.00	27	0.07	20	0.43	28	0.21	28	0.30
Pierdomenico 2008		74	0.39	48	0.00	74	0.04	76	0.04	87	0.02	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		17	0.63	27	0.00	16	0.13	19	0.44	23	0.27	20	0.34
Rabcewiczowa 1932		14	0.64	24	0.00	28	0.08	22	0.41	14	0.41	16	0.41
Rachmaninoff 1923		22	0.62	17	0.00	11	0.13	17	0.45	25	0.24	24	0.33
Rangell 2001		75	0.37	55	0.00	75	0.05	62	0.05	66	0.03	73	0.04
Richter 1976		49	0.54	44	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	35	0.17	44	0.09
Rosen 1989		48	0.55	36	0.00	52	0.05	64	0.05	81	0.03	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		60	0.50	82	0.00	64	0.06	49	0.06	50	0.05	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.31	59	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.28	80	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.36	88	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.29	83	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Rossi 2007		73	0.39	86	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.23	53	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.30	31	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	67	0.04	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		78	0.36	77	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	56	0.05	70	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		8	0.67	26	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.56	17	0.44	9	0.50
Shebanova 2002		39	0.57	13	0.01	42	0.06	44	0.11	71	0.04	49	0.07
Smith 1975		32	0.58	3	0.01	50	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04
Sokolov 2002		42	0.57	30	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.36	33	0.32	21	0.34
Sztompka 1959		3	0.73	4	0.01	2	0.32	2	0.65	7	0.54	2	0.59
Tomsic 1995		70	0.44	76	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.02	80	0.03
Uninsky 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1971		1	0.89	1	0.80	1	0.79	1	0.86	1	0.84	1	0.85
Wasowski 1980		18	0.63	7	0.01	26	0.07	26	0.39	14	0.36	19	0.37
Zak 1937		31	0.58	37	0.00	51	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.06	58	0.05
Zak 1951		35	0.58	5	0.01	45	0.06	54	0.06	51	0.06	52	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.08	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	17	0.36	53	0.06
Random 2		88	-0.06	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	13	0.34	47	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.09	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	39	0.11	82	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).