Barbosa 1983

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.60	28	0.00	16	0.11	12	0.42	55	0.04	26	0.13
Anderszewski 2003		64	0.41	56	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	87	0.02	80	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.49	41	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	74	0.03	70	0.04
Bacha 2000		34	0.50	29	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.21	30	0.22	16	0.21
Badura 1965		24	0.53	40	0.00	51	0.06	54	0.06	71	0.04	60	0.05
Barbosa 1983		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Biret 1990		17	0.56	4	0.07	7	0.13	9	0.52	29	0.25	9	0.36
Blet 2003		4	0.65	6	0.04	3	0.25	8	0.53	11	0.41	4	0.47
Block 1995		76	0.34	85	0.00	76	0.04	77	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Blumental 1952		61	0.42	62	0.00	69	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.03	68	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		70	0.37	69	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.52	5	0.04	14	0.09	31	0.21	38	0.21	17	0.21
Bunin 1987		57	0.44	55	0.00	62	0.07	45	0.07	50	0.05	50	0.06
Bunin 1987b		60	0.43	66	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.05	65	0.04
Chiu 1999		1	0.72	1	0.36	1	0.36	1	0.72	1	0.66	1	0.69
Cohen 1997		63	0.42	52	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	22	0.25	38	0.10
Cortot 1951		52	0.45	71	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	70	0.04	72	0.04
Csalog 1996		67	0.39	58	0.00	37	0.08	27	0.23	25	0.28	12	0.25
Czerny 1949		41	0.49	13	0.01	56	0.05	58	0.05	66	0.05	59	0.05
Czerny 1990		14	0.57	38	0.00	26	0.07	21	0.28	67	0.04	35	0.11
Duchoud 2007		30	0.51	23	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.18	38	0.16	21	0.17
Ezaki 2006		3	0.65	3	0.10	5	0.14	2	0.61	23	0.32	6	0.44
Falvay 1989		18	0.55	42	0.00	20	0.06	33	0.20	36	0.27	15	0.23
Farrell 1958		21	0.54	26	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	59	0.05	57	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		23	0.53	51	0.00	29	0.05	22	0.28	29	0.21	13	0.24
Fliere 1977		13	0.58	34	0.00	15	0.09	10	0.46	63	0.04	23	0.14
Fou 1978		31	0.51	9	0.02	12	0.12	19	0.30	41	0.11	19	0.18
Francois 1956		15	0.56	75	0.00	24	0.06	16	0.33	42	0.11	18	0.19
Friedman 1923		74	0.34	27	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.05	73	0.04
Friedman 1923b		73	0.35	24	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	55	0.06	71	0.04
Friedman 1930		65	0.40	8	0.02	64	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.07	58	0.05
Garcia 2007		75	0.34	89	0.00	79	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	83	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.23	61	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		50	0.46	44	0.00	60	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		47	0.47	15	0.01	21	0.07	34	0.20	44	0.09	27	0.13
Groot 1988		7	0.60	14	0.01	9	0.15	5	0.60	28	0.38	3	0.48
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.51	20	0.01	19	0.05	43	0.12	65	0.03	51	0.06
Hatto 1993		53	0.45	19	0.01	42	0.07	41	0.13	64	0.04	46	0.07
Hatto 1997		42	0.49	46	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.17	45	0.08	31	0.12
Horowitz 1949		71	0.36	59	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	83	0.02	77	0.03
Indjic 1988		46	0.47	12	0.01	41	0.07	39	0.14	63	0.04	44	0.07
Kapell 1951		45	0.47	57	0.00	25	0.06	20	0.29	65	0.04	32	0.11
Kissin 1993		59	0.43	33	0.00	63	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.03	79	0.03
Kushner 1989		37	0.50	90	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	74	0.03	63	0.04
Luisada 1991		16	0.56	74	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.18	55	0.04	43	0.08
Lushtak 2004		2	0.67	11	0.01	2	0.20	4	0.60	22	0.28	7	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961		78	0.29	70	0.00	80	0.04	65	0.04	87	0.03	76	0.03
Magaloff 1978		54	0.45	36	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	59	0.05	54	0.05
Magin 1975		79	0.28	79	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03
Michalowski 1933		82	0.25	81	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03
Milkina 1970		58	0.44	78	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	68	0.04	64	0.04
Mohovich 1999		6	0.61	2	0.12	6	0.14	3	0.61	25	0.35	5	0.46
Moravec 1969		51	0.45	30	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.03	74	0.03
Morozova 2008		19	0.55	37	0.00	18	0.08	23	0.27	46	0.05	30	0.12
Neighaus 1950		32	0.50	72	0.00	30	0.06	24	0.26	66	0.04	40	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.40	25	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	61	0.04	56	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.51	31	0.00	27	0.06	18	0.31	46	0.05	29	0.12
Osinska 1989		20	0.55	77	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.26	63	0.04	36	0.10
Pachmann 1927		48	0.47	84	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	25	0.21	33	0.11
Paderewski 1930		69	0.37	76	0.00	68	0.05	61	0.05	67	0.03	66	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.60	18	0.01	23	0.06	15	0.36	48	0.05	25	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.32	53	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	62	0.04
Poblocka 1999		62	0.42	80	0.00	52	0.07	46	0.07	70	0.04	52	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		36	0.50	35	0.00	17	0.06	14	0.36	21	0.33	10	0.34
Rachmaninoff 1923		40	0.49	60	0.00	54	0.06	51	0.06	63	0.04	55	0.05
Rangell 2001		80	0.27	83	0.00	59	0.04	72	0.04	29	0.26	39	0.10
Richter 1976		72	0.35	48	0.00	72	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.02	87	0.02
Rosen 1989		49	0.46	50	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.13	78	0.03	48	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.25	88	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.21	86	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	54	0.04	67	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		87	0.17	82	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		85	0.20	64	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	67	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.17	73	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Rossi 2007		68	0.39	54	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	26	0.26	41	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.45	43	0.00	67	0.05	57	0.05	32	0.27	28	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.50	63	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.18	29	0.31	14	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		5	0.62	17	0.01	8	0.14	6	0.55	15	0.51	2	0.53
Schilhawsky 1960		35	0.50	32	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.14	68	0.04	45	0.07
Shebanova 2002		27	0.52	68	0.00	33	0.06	25	0.26	85	0.03	42	0.09
Smith 1975		12	0.58	7	0.03	11	0.13	7	0.53	24	0.29	8	0.39
Sokolov 2002		56	0.44	21	0.01	50	0.07	47	0.07	53	0.04	53	0.05
Sztompka 1959		38	0.50	45	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	73	0.04	47	0.06
Tomsic 1995		39	0.50	22	0.01	22	0.06	28	0.23	20	0.39	11	0.30
Uninsky 1932		25	0.53	47	0.00	35	0.06	30	0.22	61	0.05	37	0.10
Uninsky 1971		44	0.48	16	0.01	32	0.06	29	0.22	54	0.06	34	0.11
Wasowski 1980		22	0.54	10	0.02	4	0.15	17	0.32	43	0.09	20	0.17
Zak 1937		9	0.60	67	0.00	13	0.12	13	0.39	62	0.05	24	0.14
Zak 1951		8	0.60	39	0.00	10	0.14	11	0.45	52	0.06	22	0.16
Random 1		88	-0.05	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	28	0.28	61	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.06	65	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	39	0.10	81	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.05	49	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	15	0.36	49	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).