Moravec 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.71	24	0.01	23	0.08	17	0.36	38	0.10	27	0.19
Anderszewski 2003		70	0.39	26	0.01	52	0.03	69	0.03	72	0.03	70	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		36	0.57	14	0.03	3	0.10	12	0.46	29	0.25	14	0.34
Bacha 2000		43	0.55	73	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.15	35	0.16	30	0.15
Badura 1965		56	0.50	34	0.00	47	0.04	48	0.04	47	0.05	59	0.04
Barbosa 1983		58	0.49	84	0.00	70	0.04	61	0.04	64	0.04	55	0.04
Biret 1990		21	0.63	56	0.00	16	0.08	16	0.39	36	0.16	22	0.25
Blet 2003		31	0.58	77	0.00	63	0.04	55	0.04	66	0.04	56	0.04
Block 1995		57	0.50	80	0.00	73	0.04	53	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.04
Blumental 1952		63	0.45	9	0.04	8	0.08	18	0.35	5	0.42	11	0.38
Boshniakovich 1969		64	0.44	45	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.53	43	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	68	0.04	51	0.04
Bunin 1987		69	0.40	71	0.00	82	0.02	79	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Bunin 1987b		68	0.40	78	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02
Chiu 1999		66	0.43	64	0.00	36	0.06	32	0.18	36	0.14	29	0.16
Cohen 1997		79	0.30	51	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	55	0.04	75	0.03
Cortot 1951		16	0.65	18	0.02	19	0.08	15	0.42	18	0.40	7	0.41
Csalog 1996		22	0.63	19	0.01	26	0.08	27	0.22	21	0.38	17	0.29
Czerny 1949		9	0.70	6	0.06	10	0.10	2	0.58	14	0.42	3	0.49
Czerny 1990		3	0.74	10	0.04	9	0.08	1	0.61	32	0.23	13	0.37
Duchoud 2007		27	0.60	70	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.18	60	0.04	38	0.08
Ezaki 2006		41	0.55	85	0.00	51	0.03	72	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.03
Falvay 1989		10	0.69	57	0.00	20	0.08	10	0.46	38	0.13	24	0.24
Farrell 1958		32	0.58	62	0.00	62	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.52	35	0.00	30	0.06	37	0.13	59	0.04	41	0.07
Fliere 1977		23	0.62	63	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.14	73	0.03	42	0.06
Fou 1978		65	0.44	47	0.00	64	0.04	57	0.04	64	0.05	54	0.04
Francois 1956		2	0.74	23	0.01	11	0.09	14	0.43	26	0.23	16	0.31
Friedman 1923		88	0.02	36	0.00	89	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.06	81	0.03
Friedman 1923b		87	0.03	74	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	66	0.05	76	0.03
Friedman 1930		82	0.22	38	0.00	59	0.05	47	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.05
Garcia 2007		83	0.21	86	0.00	85	0.02	89	0.02	71	0.03	86	0.02
Garcia 2007b		89	-0.05	81	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		7	0.71	2	0.08	2	0.08	3	0.54	10	0.35	5	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.57	44	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Groot 1988		15	0.66	72	0.00	46	0.04	52	0.04	76	0.03	78	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		73	0.37	29	0.00	53	0.03	68	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03
Hatto 1993		80	0.28	59	0.00	32	0.06	28	0.21	41	0.09	31	0.14
Hatto 1997		76	0.34	52	0.00	35	0.06	31	0.19	50	0.04	34	0.09
Horowitz 1949		20	0.64	7	0.05	18	0.08	13	0.45	22	0.31	12	0.37
Indjic 1988		77	0.31	40	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.20	36	0.14	28	0.17
Kapell 1951		8	0.70	22	0.01	24	0.10	20	0.35	31	0.29	15	0.32
Kissin 1993		24	0.62	82	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.35	38	0.18	21	0.25
Kushner 1989		5	0.71	11	0.04	14	0.15	9	0.50	19	0.33	6	0.41
Luisada 1991		53	0.51	17	0.02	15	0.10	23	0.32	30	0.24	18	0.28
Lushtak 2004		67	0.42	68	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	76	0.03	71	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.68	30	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.24	81	0.03	36	0.08
Magaloff 1978		37	0.57	69	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	68	0.03	65	0.03
Magin 1975		72	0.37	41	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.10	64	0.03	46	0.05
Michalowski 1933		81	0.26	31	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	45	0.07	47	0.05
Milkina 1970		4	0.71	13	0.03	12	0.12	11	0.46	21	0.33	9	0.39
Mohovich 1999		35	0.57	65	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	86	0.03	74	0.03
Moravec 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Morozova 2008		61	0.47	15	0.03	13	0.09	22	0.33	20	0.20	20	0.26
Neighaus 1950		44	0.54	55	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.08	65	0.04	45	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		12	0.69	1	0.09	1	0.08	8	0.51	1	0.61	1	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.61	21	0.01	21	0.09	21	0.35	29	0.20	19	0.26
Osinska 1989		1	0.74	5	0.06	7	0.08	5	0.53	14	0.38	4	0.45
Pachmann 1927		78	0.30	54	0.00	83	0.02	81	0.02	81	0.03	84	0.02
Paderewski 1930		29	0.59	32	0.00	31	0.06	40	0.11	59	0.03	43	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		60	0.47	37	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	81	0.03	64	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.52	28	0.01	34	0.05	29	0.21	30	0.20	26	0.20
Poblocka 1999		17	0.64	27	0.01	25	0.08	25	0.29	59	0.04	33	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		46	0.53	49	0.00	58	0.05	46	0.05	62	0.04	52	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		48	0.52	12	0.04	17	0.08	24	0.30	30	0.19	23	0.24
Rangell 2001		49	0.52	53	0.00	65	0.04	51	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04
Richter 1976		54	0.50	87	0.00	71	0.03	71	0.03	52	0.04	68	0.03
Rosen 1989		30	0.58	75	0.00	48	0.04	50	0.04	64	0.03	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		39	0.56	60	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.06	49	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.38	67	0.00	79	0.03	70	0.03	80	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.35	39	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		50	0.52	33	0.00	69	0.04	49	0.04	68	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		62	0.46	42	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.03	77	0.03
Rossi 2007		84	0.13	88	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	61	0.03	82	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.35	25	0.01	77	0.02	80	0.02	34	0.23	40	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.61	20	0.01	43	0.04	42	0.08	29	0.23	32	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.59	61	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.57	76	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.04
Shebanova 2002		11	0.69	4	0.06	4	0.09	4	0.54	11	0.49	2	0.51
Smith 1975		42	0.55	83	0.00	49	0.05	45	0.05	84	0.02	66	0.03
Sokolov 2002		45	0.54	66	0.00	28	0.07	39	0.12	59	0.04	39	0.07
Sztompka 1959		40	0.56	8	0.05	29	0.06	38	0.12	52	0.06	37	0.08
Tomsic 1995		33	0.57	48	0.00	50	0.04	66	0.04	85	0.03	67	0.03
Uninsky 1932		59	0.48	46	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	59	0.04	44	0.06
Uninsky 1971		55	0.50	89	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	71	0.03	69	0.03
Wasowski 1980		19	0.64	58	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.13	13	0.32	25	0.20
Zak 1937		14	0.66	3	0.07	5	0.10	7	0.51	20	0.31	8	0.40
Zak 1951		18	0.64	16	0.02	6	0.10	6	0.51	27	0.28	10	0.38
Random 1		90	-0.22	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		86	0.05	50	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	9	0.39	35	0.09
Random 3		85	0.05	79	0.00	87	0.02	83	0.02	34	0.15	50	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).