Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		69	0.48	82	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.04	79	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		6	0.73	11	0.04	10	0.13	9	0.48	6	0.55	8	0.51
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 2000		42	0.59	68	0.00	66	0.04	60	0.04	15	0.40	43	0.13
Badura 1965		61	0.53	69	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.11	19	0.37	40	0.20
Barbosa 1983		79	0.40	79	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	45	0.06	75	0.04
Biret 1990		20	0.68	60	0.00	19	0.07	13	0.39	7	0.45	15	0.42
Blet 2003		32	0.62	32	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.21	26	0.23	36	0.22
Block 1995		71	0.48	54	0.00	75	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.18	57	0.08
Blumental 1952		44	0.58	62	0.00	38	0.04	37	0.14	7	0.40	33	0.24
Boshniakovich 1969		41	0.59	59	0.00	55	0.03	66	0.03	39	0.14	67	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		51	0.56	75	0.00	74	0.03	70	0.03	65	0.04	85	0.03
Bunin 1987		34	0.62	56	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	38	0.15	58	0.08
Bunin 1987b		31	0.62	63	0.00	50	0.04	53	0.04	38	0.16	55	0.08
Chiu 1999		60	0.53	43	0.00	47	0.05	45	0.05	18	0.36	44	0.13
Cohen 1997		68	0.51	10	0.04	56	0.03	69	0.03	9	0.45	47	0.12
Cortot 1951		30	0.64	22	0.01	14	0.07	27	0.27	13	0.44	22	0.34
Csalog 1996		80	0.40	88	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	35	0.23	56	0.08
Czerny 1949		64	0.52	47	0.00	62	0.04	50	0.04	41	0.10	66	0.06
Czerny 1990		25	0.65	30	0.00	21	0.07	15	0.38	19	0.29	23	0.33
Duchoud 2007		7	0.72	6	0.05	5	0.10	5	0.51	3	0.52	9	0.51
Ezaki 2006		12	0.70	80	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.33	31	0.18	32	0.24
Falvay 1989		43	0.58	29	0.00	32	0.05	38	0.13	40	0.12	46	0.12
Farrell 1958		45	0.58	40	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.03	87	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.55	33	0.00	37	0.05	35	0.16	20	0.38	30	0.25
Fliere 1977		13	0.70	74	0.00	29	0.11	25	0.30	26	0.23	28	0.26
Fou 1978		49	0.57	18	0.01	31	0.08	40	0.12	47	0.07	53	0.09
Francois 1956		74	0.45	66	0.00	61	0.04	52	0.04	49	0.05	84	0.04
Friedman 1923		86	0.26	83	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.20	70	0.06
Friedman 1923b		85	0.26	78	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	35	0.20	68	0.06
Friedman 1930		75	0.45	26	0.00	67	0.04	56	0.04	25	0.33	50	0.11
Garcia 2007		70	0.48	70	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	6	0.48	35	0.23
Garcia 2007b		83	0.33	51	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	17	0.24	60	0.08
Gierzod 1998		2	0.78	1	0.17	1	0.16	1	0.59	1	0.60	3	0.59
Gornostaeva 1994		56	0.54	34	0.00	72	0.04	51	0.04	62	0.03	90	0.03
Groot 1988		67	0.51	48	0.00	71	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04	82	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		52	0.55	15	0.02	20	0.07	21	0.34	20	0.33	25	0.33
Hatto 1993		17	0.69	16	0.02	8	0.11	2	0.56	3	0.67	2	0.61
Hatto 1997		16	0.70	44	0.00	9	0.09	6	0.51	3	0.58	5	0.54
Horowitz 1949		53	0.55	20	0.01	60	0.03	68	0.03	36	0.13	65	0.06
Indjic 1988		18	0.69	5	0.05	7	0.09	3	0.56	3	0.66	1	0.61
Kapell 1951		22	0.66	28	0.00	27	0.08	14	0.39	17	0.43	16	0.41
Kissin 1993		26	0.64	13	0.03	15	0.06	26	0.28	15	0.45	20	0.35
Kushner 1989		11	0.70	4	0.06	4	0.09	10	0.46	1	0.60	6	0.53
Luisada 1991		8	0.71	9	0.04	13	0.10	8	0.49	1	0.56	7	0.52
Lushtak 2004		3	0.74	41	0.00	11	0.13	7	0.50	11	0.48	10	0.49
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.69	14	0.02	30	0.11	24	0.32	28	0.26	27	0.29
Magaloff 1978		21	0.67	12	0.03	16	0.08	30	0.25	30	0.26	29	0.25
Magin 1975		15	0.70	8	0.05	17	0.07	17	0.37	1	0.53	12	0.44
Michalowski 1933		35	0.61	17	0.01	12	0.15	16	0.38	3	0.49	13	0.43
Milkina 1970		37	0.61	52	0.00	45	0.03	63	0.03	40	0.16	62	0.07
Mohovich 1999		38	0.60	65	0.00	59	0.03	73	0.03	59	0.04	89	0.03
Moravec 1969		48	0.57	42	0.00	24	0.08	29	0.25	12	0.46	21	0.34
Morozova 2008		40	0.59	35	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	28	0.17	45	0.13
Neighaus 1950		14	0.70	37	0.00	28	0.09	18	0.35	29	0.31	24	0.33
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.37	50	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	19	0.27	52	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.79	3	0.09	2	0.10	4	0.54	3	0.59	4	0.56
Osinska 1989		46	0.58	84	0.00	53	0.03	67	0.03	40	0.13	64	0.06
Pachmann 1927		84	0.32	72	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.03	88	0.03
Paderewski 1930		27	0.64	24	0.01	41	0.04	41	0.11	11	0.39	37	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.53	57	0.00	58	0.03	74	0.03	49	0.05	72	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		50	0.56	67	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	21	0.29	49	0.11
Poblocka 1999		4	0.73	2	0.09	3	0.10	12	0.45	6	0.51	11	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.51	76	0.00	70	0.03	65	0.03	49	0.05	74	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		77	0.44	31	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	37	0.14	61	0.07
Rangell 2001		39	0.59	39	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	38	0.15	59	0.08
Richter 1976		63	0.52	23	0.01	57	0.03	78	0.03	43	0.07	71	0.05
Rosen 1989		24	0.65	55	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	16	0.43	42	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.58	58	0.00	68	0.03	62	0.03	28	0.26	54	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.44	85	0.00	80	0.03	64	0.03	47	0.06	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.45	61	0.00	78	0.02	84	0.02	42	0.10	83	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		36	0.61	77	0.00	69	0.05	47	0.05	24	0.28	48	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		72	0.45	49	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.05	81	0.04
Rossi 2007		88	0.19	89	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	39	0.09	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.24	81	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.04	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.42	53	0.00	81	0.03	71	0.03	42	0.11	69	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		65	0.52	45	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.05	77	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.64	21	0.01	22	0.06	19	0.35	11	0.39	18	0.37
Shebanova 2002		5	0.73	19	0.01	23	0.09	20	0.35	4	0.54	14	0.43
Smith 1975		9	0.71	7	0.05	6	0.13	11	0.45	7	0.35	17	0.40
Sokolov 2002		10	0.71	27	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.32	19	0.39	19	0.35
Sztompka 1959		29	0.64	38	0.00	39	0.04	36	0.14	21	0.37	34	0.23
Tomsic 1995		23	0.65	73	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	40	0.11	63	0.07
Uninsky 1932		55	0.54	64	0.00	40	0.06	33	0.17	21	0.38	31	0.25
Uninsky 1971		33	0.62	71	0.00	34	0.05	28	0.27	24	0.39	26	0.32
Wasowski 1980		62	0.52	46	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.17	20	0.24	38	0.20
Zak 1937		57	0.53	86	0.00	33	0.08	39	0.13	36	0.18	41	0.15
Zak 1951		59	0.53	36	0.00	18	0.08	31	0.21	37	0.19	39	0.20
Random 1		89	0.02	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	42	0.14	80	0.04
Random 2		90	-0.04	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	36	0.15	78	0.04
Random 3		82	0.34	25	0.01	86	0.02	83	0.02	2	0.54	51	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).