Rabcewiczowa 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.68	50	0.00	13	0.09	8	0.47	21	0.28	14	0.36
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.50	64	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.04	50	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.51	75	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.03	60	0.04
Bacha 2000		70	0.38	33	0.00	65	0.03	70	0.03	48	0.06	52	0.04
Badura 1965		51	0.49	87	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	71	0.03	75	0.03
Barbosa 1983		38	0.55	18	0.01	22	0.07	24	0.32	26	0.33	17	0.32
Biret 1990		11	0.68	6	0.05	8	0.10	12	0.44	17	0.30	15	0.36
Blet 2003		33	0.57	76	0.00	37	0.08	30	0.21	52	0.05	33	0.10
Block 1995		60	0.45	27	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	67	0.03	76	0.03
Blumental 1952		63	0.42	58	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.21	23	0.22	29	0.21
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.54	28	0.00	70	0.03	66	0.03	58	0.04	77	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.38	69	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.04	61	0.03
Bunin 1987		36	0.56	90	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.13	54	0.05	40	0.08
Bunin 1987b		35	0.56	81	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.12	56	0.04	43	0.07
Chiu 1999		67	0.40	11	0.02	55	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04
Cohen 1997		86	0.17	29	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Cortot 1951		12	0.67	22	0.01	16	0.10	14	0.41	15	0.43	7	0.42
Csalog 1996		73	0.32	66	0.00	81	0.02	81	0.02	58	0.04	71	0.03
Czerny 1949		1	0.80	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.65	3	0.59	1	0.62
Czerny 1990		2	0.78	30	0.00	6	0.14	4	0.49	17	0.31	11	0.39
Duchoud 2007		26	0.62	89	0.00	25	0.07	18	0.37	33	0.25	20	0.30
Ezaki 2006		9	0.69	19	0.01	19	0.06	19	0.36	48	0.06	30	0.15
Falvay 1989		47	0.51	48	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	67	0.04	57	0.04
Farrell 1958		31	0.58	43	0.00	33	0.05	27	0.23	21	0.23	27	0.23
Ferenczy 1958		28	0.61	39	0.00	18	0.09	21	0.35	15	0.41	12	0.38
Fliere 1977		25	0.63	78	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	63	0.04	48	0.05
Fou 1978		74	0.32	61	0.00	66	0.03	72	0.03	73	0.04	63	0.03
Francois 1956		7	0.70	4	0.07	3	0.17	10	0.47	10	0.38	8	0.42
Friedman 1923		82	0.21	79	0.00	34	0.05	39	0.15	10	0.45	25	0.26
Friedman 1923b		83	0.21	80	0.00	29	0.05	38	0.15	10	0.44	24	0.26
Friedman 1930		43	0.52	55	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.40	12	0.41	9	0.40
Garcia 2007		76	0.29	82	0.00	72	0.03	67	0.03	58	0.04	74	0.03
Garcia 2007b		77	0.27	65	0.00	63	0.04	61	0.04	28	0.16	42	0.08
Gierzod 1998		20	0.65	15	0.01	20	0.07	15	0.41	20	0.23	18	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.72	24	0.01	11	0.08	20	0.36	29	0.21	23	0.27
Groot 1988		30	0.59	41	0.00	32	0.06	42	0.11	67	0.03	47	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.46	20	0.01	30	0.05	32	0.17	59	0.04	41	0.08
Hatto 1993		84	0.21	83	0.00	62	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.03	80	0.03
Hatto 1997		75	0.31	51	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	60	0.03	51	0.05
Horowitz 1949		66	0.40	59	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	70	0.03	67	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.22	84	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	71	0.03	70	0.03
Kapell 1951		6	0.70	8	0.02	7	0.09	9	0.47	21	0.41	5	0.44
Kissin 1993		59	0.45	67	0.00	69	0.03	65	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.03
Kushner 1989		22	0.64	54	0.00	31	0.06	37	0.16	44	0.12	31	0.14
Luisada 1991		48	0.51	85	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.04	54	0.04
Lushtak 2004		50	0.49	62	0.00	36	0.09	29	0.22	55	0.04	37	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.65	46	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.26	60	0.04	32	0.10
Magaloff 1978		34	0.56	14	0.01	52	0.04	52	0.04	76	0.03	62	0.03
Magin 1975		68	0.39	21	0.01	77	0.02	84	0.02	71	0.03	84	0.02
Michalowski 1933		16	0.65	5	0.06	5	0.21	3	0.52	11	0.45	3	0.48
Milkina 1970		57	0.46	16	0.01	61	0.03	71	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.03
Mohovich 1999		24	0.63	36	0.00	38	0.08	28	0.23	51	0.04	34	0.10
Moravec 1969		42	0.53	52	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	46	0.05	53	0.04
Morozova 2008		37	0.56	53	0.00	26	0.06	33	0.17	61	0.04	39	0.08
Neighaus 1950		13	0.67	9	0.02	9	0.08	7	0.48	35	0.18	21	0.29
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.41	86	0.00	76	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.62	34	0.00	39	0.07	36	0.16	53	0.05	36	0.09
Osinska 1989		4	0.75	38	0.00	14	0.09	16	0.41	10	0.38	10	0.39
Pachmann 1927		78	0.25	49	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.03	68	0.03
Paderewski 1930		17	0.65	10	0.02	24	0.08	23	0.33	8	0.40	13	0.36
Perlemuter 1992		46	0.51	74	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	57	0.04	49	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		29	0.60	47	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	47	0.04	58	0.04
Poblocka 1999		18	0.65	31	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.35	34	0.21	22	0.27
Rabcewiczowa 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rachmaninoff 1923		52	0.49	37	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	64	0.04	56	0.04
Rangell 2001		53	0.48	23	0.01	71	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.03	79	0.03
Richter 1976		71	0.35	57	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Rosen 1989		23	0.63	32	0.00	21	0.07	25	0.32	25	0.34	16	0.33
Rosenthal 1930		44	0.52	40	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04	59	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.23	71	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.20	77	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	81	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		62	0.42	44	0.00	78	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.25	60	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		58	0.46	13	0.01	27	0.08	35	0.17	10	0.28	28	0.22
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.11	73	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.03	82	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.34	35	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		55	0.47	45	0.00	64	0.03	68	0.03	67	0.04	72	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		39	0.54	70	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.09	58	0.05	44	0.07
Shebanova 2002		54	0.47	68	0.00	68	0.03	64	0.03	64	0.04	73	0.03
Smith 1975		8	0.69	12	0.01	15	0.11	6	0.48	43	0.11	26	0.23
Sokolov 2002		14	0.67	7	0.03	12	0.11	13	0.41	37	0.22	19	0.30
Sztompka 1959		3	0.77	2	0.17	2	0.25	2	0.56	6	0.51	2	0.53
Tomsic 1995		32	0.57	17	0.01	40	0.07	34	0.17	50	0.04	38	0.08
Uninsky 1932		21	0.64	3	0.12	4	0.17	5	0.49	7	0.46	4	0.47
Uninsky 1971		15	0.66	25	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.46	21	0.41	6	0.43
Wasowski 1980		41	0.53	56	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	71	0.04	45	0.06
Zak 1937		64	0.42	88	0.00	73	0.04	54	0.04	78	0.03	64	0.03
Zak 1951		61	0.43	72	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	79	0.03	66	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.17	42	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	0.00	26	0.01	88	0.02	86	0.02	27	0.20	46	0.06
Random 3		88	0.06	63	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	17	0.35	35	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).