Blumental 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.33	61	0.00	39	0.04	37	0.12	50	0.04	41	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		50	0.35	63	0.00	51	0.04	52	0.04	56	0.04	59	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.58	22	0.01	15	0.08	7	0.40	37	0.14	16	0.24
Bacha 2000		59	0.31	57	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.04
Badura 1965		43	0.37	33	0.00	47	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.04
Barbosa 1983		65	0.28	70	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	75	0.03	70	0.03
Biret 1990		28	0.42	54	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.21	55	0.04	34	0.09
Blet 2003		20	0.44	37	0.00	40	0.04	40	0.10	62	0.04	49	0.06
Block 1995		81	0.18	18	0.01	54	0.04	53	0.04	42	0.11	43	0.07
Blumental 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Boshniakovich 1969		5	0.55	14	0.02	22	0.10	21	0.23	36	0.18	22	0.20
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.33	13	0.03	71	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.04	64	0.03
Bunin 1987		41	0.37	79	0.00	59	0.04	57	0.04	79	0.03	74	0.03
Bunin 1987b		40	0.38	59	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	68	0.04	57	0.04
Chiu 1999		35	0.39	41	0.00	36	0.04	39	0.11	70	0.04	39	0.07
Cohen 1997		83	0.14	36	0.00	79	0.02	80	0.02	80	0.02	84	0.02
Cortot 1951		1	0.58	3	0.09	3	0.10	1	0.46	14	0.44	1	0.45
Csalog 1996		86	0.12	46	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.03	83	0.02
Czerny 1949		9	0.52	7	0.05	5	0.08	6	0.41	28	0.26	7	0.33
Czerny 1990		10	0.49	48	0.00	18	0.08	8	0.37	39	0.12	20	0.21
Duchoud 2007		42	0.37	31	0.01	45	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.04	51	0.05
Ezaki 2006		33	0.40	80	0.00	32	0.05	36	0.12	72	0.03	45	0.06
Falvay 1989		52	0.34	42	0.00	70	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.03	66	0.03
Farrell 1958		22	0.43	50	0.00	31	0.05	26	0.18	42	0.11	28	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		44	0.37	19	0.01	11	0.08	19	0.24	31	0.26	14	0.25
Fliere 1977		39	0.38	60	0.00	66	0.03	68	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.03
Fou 1978		74	0.24	43	0.00	81	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.02	80	0.02
Francois 1956		75	0.22	72	0.00	60	0.04	51	0.04	72	0.03	78	0.03
Friedman 1923		62	0.30	27	0.01	13	0.08	15	0.31	9	0.45	5	0.37
Friedman 1923b		61	0.30	20	0.01	12	0.08	14	0.32	9	0.45	4	0.38
Friedman 1930		69	0.27	73	0.00	27	0.07	20	0.24	35	0.17	21	0.20
Garcia 2007		49	0.35	56	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	31	0.22	32	0.11
Garcia 2007b		60	0.31	15	0.02	16	0.08	22	0.22	6	0.41	11	0.30
Gierzod 1998		4	0.56	12	0.03	7	0.11	2	0.45	22	0.22	10	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		68	0.27	51	0.00	77	0.03	69	0.03	72	0.03	75	0.03
Groot 1988		76	0.22	47	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	87	0.02
Harasiewicz 1955		73	0.25	16	0.02	57	0.04	49	0.04	78	0.03	76	0.03
Hatto 1993		25	0.42	86	0.00	23	0.09	28	0.17	32	0.17	25	0.17
Hatto 1997		23	0.43	76	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.20	32	0.15	24	0.17
Horowitz 1949		34	0.40	10	0.03	28	0.06	34	0.12	52	0.05	37	0.08
Indjic 1988		27	0.42	84	0.00	24	0.08	29	0.17	37	0.13	27	0.15
Kapell 1951		37	0.38	11	0.03	10	0.09	11	0.34	30	0.29	9	0.31
Kissin 1993		57	0.33	28	0.01	75	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.04	69	0.03
Kushner 1989		26	0.42	26	0.01	46	0.04	54	0.04	56	0.04	56	0.04
Luisada 1991		14	0.46	21	0.01	38	0.04	33	0.13	57	0.04	38	0.07
Lushtak 2004		18	0.44	71	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.14	56	0.04	42	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.37	39	0.00	56	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.03	58	0.04
Magaloff 1978		71	0.26	29	0.01	78	0.02	78	0.02	84	0.03	79	0.02
Magin 1975		31	0.41	1	0.12	1	0.12	27	0.18	39	0.13	26	0.15
Michalowski 1933		15	0.45	4	0.08	4	0.09	3	0.44	19	0.42	2	0.43
Milkina 1970		63	0.30	24	0.01	37	0.05	43	0.08	59	0.04	46	0.06
Mohovich 1999		58	0.32	30	0.01	72	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03	73	0.03
Moravec 1969		16	0.45	2	0.09	2	0.09	5	0.42	18	0.35	3	0.38
Morozova 2008		3	0.57	5	0.05	9	0.10	9	0.35	32	0.15	17	0.23
Neighaus 1950		30	0.41	77	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.11	63	0.04	44	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.21	35	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	37	0.16	35	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.44	81	0.00	43	0.05	35	0.12	78	0.03	48	0.06
Osinska 1989		13	0.47	17	0.01	17	0.10	12	0.33	21	0.30	8	0.31
Pachmann 1927		88	0.03	87	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01
Paderewski 1930		12	0.47	9	0.04	19	0.08	16	0.30	24	0.23	13	0.26
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.40	55	0.00	50	0.04	50	0.04	62	0.03	63	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.28	88	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	59	0.04	67	0.03
Poblocka 1999		21	0.43	25	0.01	20	0.10	18	0.24	38	0.15	23	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		24	0.42	78	0.00	30	0.05	23	0.22	31	0.21	19	0.21
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.28	45	0.00	48	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.04	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		78	0.20	67	0.00	80	0.02	83	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.02
Richter 1976		87	0.11	65	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.03	81	0.02
Rosen 1989		48	0.36	44	0.00	41	0.04	44	0.08	36	0.22	29	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.33	38	0.00	64	0.03	67	0.03	58	0.04	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.13	64	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.18	85	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		53	0.34	32	0.00	65	0.03	66	0.03	63	0.03	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.18	68	0.00	83	0.02	79	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02
Rossi 2007		79	0.19	34	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	49	0.04	65	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.27	82	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	36	0.18	40	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.26	83	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.35	74	0.00	69	0.04	60	0.04	86	0.02	71	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		36	0.39	53	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.09	73	0.03	50	0.05
Shebanova 2002		11	0.47	49	0.00	34	0.05	31	0.16	47	0.07	31	0.11
Smith 1975		17	0.45	6	0.05	8	0.09	10	0.35	38	0.17	15	0.24
Sokolov 2002		38	0.38	75	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	62	0.04	54	0.04
Sztompka 1959		8	0.53	8	0.05	6	0.10	4	0.43	32	0.28	6	0.35
Tomsic 1995		67	0.28	58	0.00	76	0.03	65	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.03
Uninsky 1932		6	0.54	23	0.01	14	0.08	13	0.32	31	0.27	12	0.29
Uninsky 1971		7	0.54	52	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.27	42	0.18	18	0.22
Wasowski 1980		46	0.36	62	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	72	0.04	53	0.04
Zak 1937		29	0.41	40	0.00	29	0.06	30	0.16	70	0.04	36	0.08
Zak 1951		47	0.36	66	0.00	35	0.04	41	0.10	71	0.04	47	0.06
Random 1		90	0.00	69	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	30	0.19	61	0.04
Random 2		89	0.00	89	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	22	0.26	33	0.09
Random 3		85	0.13	90	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	13	0.42	30	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).