Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.63	5	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.21	41	0.10	40	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.59	6	0.00	23	0.08	25	0.32	17	0.39	24	0.35
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.62	7	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.15	54	0.04	53	0.08
Bacha 2000		80	0.36	8	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.04	69	0.03
Badura 1965		57	0.51	9	0.00	50	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.21	45	0.10
Barbosa 1983		28	0.63	10	0.00	26	0.07	32	0.26	19	0.39	25	0.32
Biret 1990		38	0.61	11	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	48	0.05	68	0.04
Blet 2003		6	0.75	12	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.46	13	0.40	10	0.43
Block 1995		75	0.39	13	0.00	59	0.03	71	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Blumental 1952		77	0.37	14	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	57	0.04	80	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		46	0.57	15	0.00	61	0.03	73	0.03	53	0.04	81	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.56	2	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.05	59	0.04
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	1.00	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	0	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		68	0.46	16	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	50	0.05	60	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.22	17	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	52	0.04	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		48	0.56	18	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	41	0.16	48	0.09
Csalog 1996		84	0.28	19	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Czerny 1949		23	0.65	20	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.34	24	0.31	27	0.32
Czerny 1990		17	0.69	21	0.00	22	0.10	20	0.37	35	0.20	31	0.27
Duchoud 2007		21	0.67	22	0.00	30	0.10	22	0.36	23	0.40	17	0.38
Ezaki 2006		5	0.76	23	0.00	7	0.16	6	0.49	15	0.38	8	0.43
Falvay 1989		45	0.57	24	0.00	63	0.04	59	0.04	75	0.03	72	0.03
Farrell 1958		35	0.61	25	0.00	57	0.05	46	0.05	30	0.18	47	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.66	26	0.00	35	0.07	29	0.27	7	0.49	22	0.36
Fliere 1977		10	0.71	27	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.37	38	0.14	32	0.23
Fou 1978		54	0.53	28	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	54	0.05	62	0.04
Francois 1956		31	0.62	29	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.20	50	0.05	46	0.10
Friedman 1923		83	0.29	30	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	12	0.43	41	0.13
Friedman 1923b		82	0.30	31	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	11	0.43	39	0.15
Friedman 1930		63	0.48	32	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.30	10	0.43	21	0.36
Garcia 2007		69	0.46	33	0.00	60	0.03	72	0.03	18	0.34	44	0.10
Garcia 2007b		86	0.27	34	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	57	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		43	0.57	35	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	48	0.05	67	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.61	36	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	45	0.06	55	0.05
Groot 1988		16	0.69	37	0.00	13	0.07	18	0.39	27	0.24	28	0.31
Harasiewicz 1955		24	0.64	38	0.00	3	0.18	7	0.49	4	0.45	6	0.47
Hatto 1993		67	0.46	39	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	23	0.28	42	0.12
Hatto 1997		44	0.57	40	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.26	15	0.39	26	0.32
Horowitz 1949		49	0.56	41	0.00	58	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.10	54	0.07
Indjic 1988		58	0.50	42	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.11	18	0.37	35	0.20
Kapell 1951		11	0.71	43	0.00	16	0.07	12	0.43	16	0.44	9	0.43
Kissin 1993		70	0.45	44	0.00	78	0.04	68	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.04
Kushner 1989		52	0.54	45	0.00	67	0.05	48	0.05	57	0.04	63	0.04
Luisada 1991		53	0.53	46	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	56	0.04	70	0.03
Lushtak 2004		2	0.78	47	0.00	4	0.16	2	0.58	2	0.60	2	0.59
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.71	48	0.00	19	0.08	10	0.45	33	0.18	30	0.28
Magaloff 1978		33	0.62	49	0.00	25	0.07	33	0.24	72	0.03	50	0.08
Magin 1975		65	0.47	50	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04
Michalowski 1933		73	0.43	51	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.23	24	0.37	29	0.29
Milkina 1970		72	0.43	52	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	72	0.03	76	0.03
Mohovich 1999		8	0.74	53	0.00	9	0.10	13	0.43	18	0.36	15	0.39
Moravec 1969		74	0.40	3	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	79	0.02	86	0.02
Morozova 2008		29	0.62	54	0.00	24	0.07	30	0.27	21	0.20	33	0.23
Neighaus 1950		13	0.71	55	0.00	14	0.07	11	0.45	27	0.32	18	0.38
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.37	56	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.03	75	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.61	57	0.00	49	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.05	64	0.04
Osinska 1989		62	0.48	58	0.00	76	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04
Pachmann 1927		42	0.57	59	0.00	8	0.09	26	0.31	12	0.51	13	0.40
Paderewski 1930		47	0.57	60	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.12	18	0.26	38	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.68	61	0.00	17	0.07	15	0.42	9	0.43	11	0.42
Pierdomenico 2008		66	0.47	62	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	67	0.03	73	0.03
Poblocka 1999		30	0.62	4	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.12	45	0.06	49	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.56	63	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	40	0.13	51	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		19	0.68	64	0.00	12	0.09	14	0.43	11	0.38	12	0.40
Rangell 2001		71	0.44	65	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03
Richter 1976		34	0.62	66	0.00	31	0.08	23	0.35	8	0.42	16	0.38
Rosen 1989		64	0.47	67	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	54	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		25	0.63	68	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.30	12	0.46	19	0.37
Rosenthal 1931		55	0.52	69	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.12	26	0.33	36	0.20
Rosenthal 1931b		60	0.49	70	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	34	0.16	43	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c		41	0.59	71	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.16	22	0.31	34	0.22
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.49	72	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	45	0.06	56	0.05
Rossi 2007		85	0.28	73	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.03	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.31	74	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	54	0.05	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		76	0.38	75	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	59	0.05	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		56	0.51	76	0.00	77	0.04	56	0.04	47	0.05	66	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		7	0.74	77	0.00	5	0.19	3	0.56	2	0.56	4	0.56
Shebanova 2002		79	0.36	78	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	73	0.03	88	0.02
Smith 1975		9	0.73	79	0.00	10	0.09	8	0.46	21	0.26	23	0.35
Sokolov 2002		3	0.77	80	0.00	6	0.20	5	0.51	12	0.44	5	0.47
Sztompka 1959		15	0.69	81	0.00	21	0.08	16	0.41	18	0.39	14	0.40
Tomsic 1995		12	0.71	82	0.00	20	0.09	21	0.36	18	0.36	20	0.36
Uninsky 1932		20	0.67	83	0.00	15	0.07	17	0.41	5	0.50	7	0.45
Uninsky 1971		4	0.77	84	0.00	2	0.18	4	0.55	3	0.58	3	0.56
Wasowski 1980		61	0.49	85	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	49	0.05	57	0.04
Zak 1937		39	0.60	86	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	40	0.14	52	0.08
Zak 1951		27	0.63	87	0.00	36	0.07	39	0.15	30	0.25	37	0.19
Random 1		88	-0.05	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	73	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.13	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	51	0.04	77	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).