Blet 2003

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		1	0.80	11	0.02	5	0.12	5	0.52	6	0.43	5	0.47
Anderszewski 2003		57	0.54	27	0.01	35	0.06	39	0.12	28	0.24	36	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		39	0.62	44	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.23	32	0.21	33	0.22
Bacha 2000		70	0.46	42	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03	71	0.03
Badura 1965		42	0.61	55	0.00	18	0.08	19	0.34	3	0.60	6	0.45
Barbosa 1983		9	0.75	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.63	1	0.58	1	0.60
Biret 1990		26	0.66	73	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.11	47	0.05	51	0.07
Blet 2003		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Block 1995		71	0.46	20	0.01	46	0.04	56	0.04	53	0.04	66	0.04
Blumental 1952		74	0.44	34	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	40	0.10	53	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		52	0.57	58	0.00	65	0.03	75	0.03	48	0.06	67	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.49	47	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	81	0.03	85	0.02
Bunin 1987		6	0.75	8	0.03	10	0.11	13	0.40	9	0.46	10	0.43
Bunin 1987b		7	0.75	64	0.00	11	0.18	12	0.40	9	0.46	9	0.43
Chiu 1999		53	0.56	39	0.00	55	0.07	45	0.07	39	0.13	46	0.10
Cohen 1997		86	0.19	81	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.02	88	0.02
Cortot 1951		38	0.62	54	0.00	33	0.05	41	0.12	23	0.32	34	0.20
Csalog 1996		66	0.48	65	0.00	76	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.07	56	0.05
Czerny 1949		25	0.66	76	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.32	23	0.32	24	0.32
Czerny 1990		2	0.77	19	0.01	4	0.11	8	0.49	12	0.39	8	0.44
Duchoud 2007		14	0.73	9	0.03	6	0.14	7	0.49	4	0.51	3	0.50
Ezaki 2006		3	0.76	66	0.00	8	0.14	6	0.51	19	0.32	13	0.40
Falvay 1989		30	0.64	16	0.01	60	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04	60	0.04
Farrell 1958		47	0.58	80	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	54	0.04	61	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.69	41	0.00	28	0.08	25	0.25	14	0.41	23	0.32
Fliere 1977		4	0.76	10	0.02	9	0.15	4	0.52	19	0.31	14	0.40
Fou 1978		44	0.59	48	0.00	51	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.05	62	0.04
Francois 1956		32	0.64	67	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.15	33	0.15	38	0.15
Friedman 1923		85	0.27	61	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	16	0.42	42	0.13
Friedman 1923b		84	0.27	35	0.00	67	0.03	71	0.03	17	0.41	45	0.11
Friedman 1930		82	0.33	28	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.12	27	0.30	35	0.19
Garcia 2007		77	0.39	46	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	39	0.16	50	0.07
Garcia 2007b		87	0.16	22	0.01	84	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.03	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		51	0.57	57	0.00	64	0.03	70	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		31	0.64	17	0.01	20	0.07	38	0.14	41	0.13	41	0.13
Groot 1988		22	0.67	77	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04	68	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		67	0.48	74	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.04	69	0.04
Hatto 1993		72	0.45	23	0.01	40	0.07	36	0.15	17	0.35	32	0.23
Hatto 1997		56	0.55	53	0.00	34	0.06	27	0.23	16	0.39	25	0.30
Horowitz 1949		73	0.45	56	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03	79	0.03
Indjic 1988		65	0.49	75	0.00	39	0.04	30	0.18	12	0.40	28	0.27
Kapell 1951		15	0.73	31	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.38	18	0.43	15	0.40
Kissin 1993		43	0.61	32	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04	65	0.04
Kushner 1989		23	0.67	36	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.04	63	0.04
Luisada 1991		35	0.62	15	0.01	47	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.06	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004		12	0.74	3	0.10	3	0.15	2	0.54	9	0.51	2	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.68	24	0.01	37	0.05	34	0.16	51	0.04	49	0.08
Magaloff 1978		60	0.53	82	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	66	0.03	73	0.03
Magin 1975		68	0.48	33	0.00	71	0.04	67	0.04	68	0.03	77	0.03
Michalowski 1933		79	0.36	79	0.00	31	0.05	28	0.21	23	0.37	27	0.28
Milkina 1970		54	0.56	25	0.01	75	0.03	74	0.03	70	0.04	78	0.03
Mohovich 1999		5	0.76	21	0.01	19	0.11	9	0.43	15	0.37	17	0.40
Moravec 1969		48	0.58	69	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04
Morozova 2008		27	0.66	59	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.29	15	0.24	30	0.26
Neighaus 1950		24	0.67	37	0.00	21	0.06	11	0.41	31	0.27	21	0.33
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.42	45	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	66	0.03	76	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.65	70	0.00	42	0.06	32	0.17	38	0.14	37	0.15
Osinska 1989		34	0.64	84	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	44	0.08	52	0.06
Pachmann 1927		58	0.54	72	0.00	59	0.04	53	0.04	26	0.28	44	0.11
Paderewski 1930		41	0.61	13	0.02	32	0.06	29	0.21	13	0.38	26	0.28
Perlemuter 1992		17	0.72	18	0.01	16	0.08	15	0.39	10	0.43	11	0.41
Pierdomenico 2008		69	0.47	71	0.00	80	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.03	74	0.03
Poblocka 1999		10	0.74	29	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.40	9	0.48	7	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.57	85	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	30	0.21	47	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		49	0.57	38	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	36	0.14	43	0.11
Rangell 2001		59	0.54	4	0.05	12	0.07	31	0.17	12	0.31	31	0.23
Richter 1976		40	0.62	30	0.00	57	0.05	47	0.05	45	0.06	55	0.05
Rosen 1989		46	0.59	52	0.00	38	0.04	44	0.09	40	0.18	40	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.51	68	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	54	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.39	83	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.34	86	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	73	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		63	0.51	87	0.00	66	0.03	72	0.03	51	0.05	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.37	90	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.02
Rossi 2007		83	0.28	88	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	64	0.03	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		80	0.35	49	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	49	0.05	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.51	26	0.01	63	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.06	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		19	0.69	50	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.16	15	0.45	29	0.27
Schilhawsky 1960		33	0.64	5	0.04	15	0.08	18	0.37	17	0.36	19	0.36
Shebanova 2002		45	0.59	43	0.00	61	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.05	57	0.05
Smith 1975		13	0.73	2	0.16	2	0.16	3	0.54	1	0.45	4	0.49
Sokolov 2002		18	0.71	89	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.32	25	0.35	20	0.33
Sztompka 1959		8	0.75	7	0.03	7	0.14	10	0.42	15	0.41	12	0.41
Tomsic 1995		11	0.74	14	0.02	22	0.07	21	0.34	22	0.31	22	0.32
Uninsky 1932		29	0.65	12	0.02	23	0.07	20	0.34	20	0.41	18	0.37
Uninsky 1971		16	0.72	40	0.00	13	0.07	17	0.38	16	0.43	16	0.40
Wasowski 1980		55	0.55	6	0.04	29	0.07	35	0.16	34	0.12	39	0.14
Zak 1937		36	0.62	51	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.05	64	0.04
Zak 1951		37	0.62	60	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	39	0.17	48	0.10
Random 1		89	-0.07	63	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	58	0.04	87	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.16	62	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	53	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		88	0.02	78	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	52	0.05	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).