Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.70	4	0.09	6	0.13	11	0.47	7	0.42	8	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		60	0.48	87	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.04	75	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.65	45	0.00	30	0.06	16	0.43	46	0.05	35	0.15
Bacha 2000		14	0.70	27	0.01	24	0.07	24	0.35	13	0.45	12	0.40
Badura 1965		69	0.44	66	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.15	48	0.08
Barbosa 1983		68	0.45	70	0.00	32	0.05	42	0.15	47	0.05	45	0.09
Biret 1990		11	0.73	24	0.01	22	0.06	13	0.46	33	0.18	24	0.29
Blet 2003		37	0.59	53	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.18	44	0.09	38	0.13
Block 1995		18	0.68	8	0.03	18	0.08	21	0.38	9	0.38	13	0.38
Blumental 1952		79	0.36	25	0.01	28	0.07	36	0.22	44	0.08	39	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		26	0.65	10	0.02	15	0.09	22	0.38	16	0.32	16	0.35
Brailowsky 1960		28	0.65	30	0.01	27	0.06	30	0.27	26	0.28	26	0.27
Bunin 1987		62	0.47	52	0.00	81	0.04	54	0.04	74	0.03	82	0.03
Bunin 1987b		61	0.47	79	0.00	80	0.04	53	0.04	74	0.03	72	0.03
Chiu 1999		40	0.58	42	0.00	23	0.07	18	0.42	14	0.42	10	0.42
Cohen 1997		66	0.45	14	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.12	24	0.29	33	0.19
Cortot 1951		54	0.52	36	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	59	0.05	65	0.04
Csalog 1996		64	0.47	7	0.04	83	0.03	66	0.03	53	0.06	63	0.04
Czerny 1949		38	0.58	32	0.00	12	0.11	23	0.36	38	0.19	28	0.26
Czerny 1990		20	0.68	6	0.04	10	0.10	14	0.44	29	0.23	21	0.32
Duchoud 2007		36	0.59	48	0.00	31	0.06	38	0.20	44	0.10	36	0.14
Ezaki 2006		9	0.73	15	0.01	9	0.10	6	0.54	18	0.32	9	0.42
Falvay 1989		21	0.67	54	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.26	44	0.07	37	0.13
Farrell 1958		33	0.63	19	0.01	25	0.07	37	0.20	35	0.13	34	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		73	0.42	72	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.02	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		8	0.73	12	0.01	17	0.11	9	0.51	29	0.20	19	0.32
Fou 1978		25	0.66	20	0.01	21	0.09	17	0.42	35	0.28	17	0.34
Francois 1956		34	0.62	31	0.00	11	0.11	19	0.42	17	0.31	15	0.36
Friedman 1923		87	0.28	89	0.00	66	0.03	77	0.03	17	0.42	43	0.11
Friedman 1923b		86	0.28	80	0.00	65	0.03	80	0.03	16	0.42	41	0.11
Friedman 1930		75	0.38	61	0.00	48	0.04	52	0.04	31	0.24	44	0.10
Garcia 2007		80	0.33	63	0.00	62	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.03	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		85	0.29	73	0.00	61	0.03	71	0.03	30	0.15	52	0.07
Gierzod 1998		10	0.73	26	0.01	14	0.09	7	0.54	13	0.32	11	0.42
Gornostaeva 1994		1	0.82	1	0.23	1	0.23	2	0.67	2	0.55	3	0.61
Groot 1988		19	0.68	46	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.24	49	0.05	42	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		63	0.47	58	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.19	55	0.04	46	0.09
Hatto 1993		83	0.32	28	0.01	76	0.05	46	0.05	81	0.02	83	0.03
Hatto 1997		77	0.38	18	0.01	47	0.04	55	0.04	72	0.03	78	0.03
Horowitz 1949		58	0.50	71	0.00	78	0.03	67	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		82	0.32	69	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	87	0.02
Kapell 1951		43	0.56	74	0.00	69	0.02	83	0.02	71	0.03	85	0.02
Kissin 1993		15	0.69	81	0.00	20	0.07	20	0.40	21	0.32	14	0.36
Kushner 1989		4	0.78	43	0.00	7	0.12	8	0.51	9	0.42	6	0.46
Luisada 1991		32	0.63	64	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.31	32	0.23	25	0.27
Lushtak 2004		48	0.53	35	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.03	81	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.81	13	0.01	3	0.23	4	0.59	12	0.44	4	0.51
Magaloff 1978		5	0.78	9	0.03	5	0.13	5	0.59	14	0.41	5	0.49
Magin 1975		39	0.58	85	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.26	20	0.25	29	0.25
Michalowski 1933		76	0.38	23	0.01	46	0.04	47	0.04	54	0.05	61	0.04
Milkina 1970		17	0.69	56	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.25	36	0.19	31	0.22
Mohovich 1999		12	0.72	11	0.01	13	0.10	12	0.46	27	0.21	22	0.31
Moravec 1969		41	0.58	65	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.04	67	0.03
Morozova 2008		56	0.51	41	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.13	63	0.04	51	0.07
Neighaus 1950		3	0.80	3	0.11	2	0.21	1	0.68	2	0.57	1	0.62
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.37	78	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	78	0.02	84	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.66	21	0.01	41	0.12	33	0.25	39	0.14	32	0.19
Osinska 1989		6	0.76	2	0.12	4	0.19	3	0.64	2	0.58	2	0.61
Pachmann 1927		65	0.47	40	0.00	77	0.03	61	0.03	50	0.05	60	0.04
Paderewski 1930		35	0.60	37	0.00	19	0.08	29	0.28	21	0.26	27	0.27
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.51	68	0.00	58	0.03	65	0.03	65	0.03	69	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		29	0.64	33	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.33	24	0.28	23	0.30
Poblocka 1999		24	0.66	34	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.16	64	0.04	47	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.63	22	0.01	33	0.06	25	0.34	25	0.32	18	0.33
Rachmaninoff 1923		72	0.43	82	0.00	50	0.04	50	0.04	47	0.04	57	0.04
Rangell 2001		7	0.74	5	0.05	8	0.12	15	0.43	3	0.48	7	0.45
Richter 1976		74	0.42	47	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	67	0.03	86	0.02
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		52	0.52	59	0.00	72	0.02	82	0.02	49	0.05	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.48	57	0.00	74	0.03	72	0.03	44	0.10	55	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.50	83	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	53	0.05	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		42	0.57	51	0.00	51	0.04	49	0.04	48	0.06	56	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		45	0.55	60	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	30	0.17	49	0.08
Rossi 2007		84	0.30	67	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.12	50	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		88	0.19	39	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	71	0.04	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		49	0.53	49	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	41	0.12	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.54	44	0.00	71	0.02	84	0.02	60	0.05	76	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		67	0.45	77	0.00	82	0.04	48	0.04	82	0.03	77	0.03
Shebanova 2002		16	0.69	38	0.00	38	0.07	28	0.30	23	0.34	20	0.32
Smith 1975		22	0.67	16	0.01	16	0.10	10	0.50	41	0.12	30	0.24
Sokolov 2002		44	0.56	17	0.01	55	0.03	63	0.03	70	0.03	70	0.03
Sztompka 1959		46	0.55	88	0.00	63	0.03	70	0.03	46	0.07	54	0.05
Tomsic 1995		30	0.64	50	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	58	0.04	59	0.04
Uninsky 1932		71	0.43	75	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	50	0.05	64	0.04
Uninsky 1971		51	0.52	29	0.01	56	0.03	62	0.03	46	0.06	62	0.04
Wasowski 1980		70	0.44	86	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	55	0.04	68	0.03
Zak 1937		50	0.53	55	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	62	0.05	58	0.04
Zak 1951		53	0.52	62	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	80	0.03	73	0.03
Random 1		89	-0.05	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.10	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	62	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		81	0.32	76	0.00	79	0.03	68	0.03	1	0.60	40	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).