Czerny 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		4	0.83	76	0.00	3	0.15	3	0.52	3	0.54	4	0.53
Anderszewski 2003		59	0.58	13	0.01	29	0.06	38	0.13	20	0.32	38	0.20
Ashkenazy 1981		43	0.65	18	0.01	26	0.06	19	0.29	15	0.38	24	0.33
Bacha 2000		74	0.41	47	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	69	0.04	78	0.03
Badura 1965		44	0.64	69	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	8	0.50	36	0.21
Barbosa 1983		58	0.59	29	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.24	55	0.10
Biret 1990		26	0.70	25	0.00	49	0.05	47	0.05	34	0.18	57	0.09
Blet 2003		13	0.77	68	0.00	15	0.08	12	0.39	8	0.49	11	0.44
Block 1995		64	0.55	63	0.00	72	0.04	58	0.04	45	0.06	70	0.05
Blumental 1952		70	0.49	37	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.12	8	0.37	37	0.21
Boshniakovich 1969		49	0.63	72	0.00	73	0.04	57	0.04	57	0.04	76	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		65	0.55	79	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	53	0.05	73	0.04
Bunin 1987		32	0.69	31	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.20	20	0.37	35	0.27
Bunin 1987b		31	0.69	46	0.00	38	0.04	34	0.20	20	0.37	34	0.27
Chiu 1999		68	0.51	38	0.00	64	0.05	51	0.05	34	0.16	56	0.09
Cohen 1997		87	0.14	70	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Cortot 1951		27	0.70	86	0.00	35	0.05	33	0.20	12	0.45	30	0.30
Csalog 1996		73	0.42	60	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.04	84	0.03
Czerny 1949		1	0.89	1	0.45	1	0.45	1	0.69	1	0.74	1	0.71
Czerny 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Duchoud 2007		24	0.71	27	0.00	22	0.07	22	0.27	13	0.44	21	0.34
Ezaki 2006		2	0.83	4	0.02	5	0.17	6	0.48	7	0.51	8	0.49
Falvay 1989		28	0.70	73	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	36	0.15	60	0.08
Farrell 1958		61	0.57	71	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.63	87	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.11	19	0.38	39	0.20
Fliere 1977		7	0.80	14	0.01	16	0.07	15	0.33	16	0.34	22	0.33
Fou 1978		69	0.50	21	0.01	65	0.05	46	0.05	56	0.05	69	0.05
Francois 1956		10	0.79	16	0.01	7	0.10	8	0.46	2	0.56	7	0.51
Friedman 1923		85	0.19	42	0.00	69	0.04	53	0.04	13	0.43	48	0.13
Friedman 1923b		84	0.19	51	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	14	0.43	47	0.13
Friedman 1930		72	0.43	39	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	19	0.37	45	0.14
Garcia 2007		78	0.36	88	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	53	0.04	75	0.04
Garcia 2007b		86	0.15	65	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	51	0.04	87	0.03
Gierzod 1998		33	0.69	11	0.02	27	0.07	27	0.24	8	0.36	33	0.29
Gornostaeva 1994		14	0.77	15	0.01	23	0.09	24	0.27	16	0.36	29	0.31
Groot 1988		18	0.74	24	0.00	37	0.05	42	0.11	26	0.24	44	0.16
Harasiewicz 1955		62	0.57	23	0.00	28	0.06	21	0.28	21	0.32	31	0.30
Hatto 1993		82	0.30	20	0.01	66	0.03	74	0.03	36	0.14	67	0.06
Hatto 1997		77	0.38	50	0.00	61	0.03	73	0.03	29	0.19	64	0.08
Horowitz 1949		52	0.62	28	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	15	0.35	46	0.13
Indjic 1988		81	0.33	59	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	33	0.16	62	0.08
Kapell 1951		12	0.77	7	0.02	13	0.09	10	0.41	6	0.52	10	0.46
Kissin 1993		35	0.68	32	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	33	0.23	52	0.11
Kushner 1989		5	0.82	55	0.00	6	0.09	7	0.47	4	0.49	9	0.48
Luisada 1991		45	0.63	41	0.00	53	0.04	71	0.04	36	0.17	59	0.08
Lushtak 2004		55	0.59	81	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.19	35	0.16	43	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.83	3	0.06	4	0.16	2	0.58	2	0.62	2	0.60
Magaloff 1978		36	0.68	26	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	60	0.03	79	0.03
Magin 1975		57	0.59	6	0.02	25	0.05	37	0.13	17	0.26	42	0.18
Michalowski 1933		66	0.54	19	0.01	24	0.07	20	0.28	4	0.48	17	0.37
Milkina 1970		50	0.63	85	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	53	0.05	74	0.04
Mohovich 1999		16	0.77	82	0.00	30	0.05	23	0.27	17	0.36	28	0.31
Moravec 1969		17	0.74	12	0.02	19	0.06	32	0.23	1	0.61	16	0.37
Morozova 2008		23	0.72	49	0.00	14	0.07	11	0.39	4	0.42	14	0.40
Neighaus 1950		25	0.70	10	0.02	10	0.09	14	0.38	14	0.46	12	0.42
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.57	17	0.01	70	0.06	45	0.06	27	0.22	50	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.69	64	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	21	0.28	49	0.12
Osinska 1989		6	0.81	22	0.01	20	0.07	26	0.25	6	0.46	18	0.34
Pachmann 1927		79	0.35	44	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	54	0.05	82	0.03
Paderewski 1930		41	0.66	61	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	32	0.15	61	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.70	53	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.23	12	0.42	26	0.31
Pierdomenico 2008		37	0.68	62	0.00	62	0.03	76	0.03	39	0.10	68	0.05
Poblocka 1999		20	0.72	57	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.23	16	0.42	27	0.31
Rabcewiczowa 1932		11	0.78	83	0.00	21	0.07	17	0.31	4	0.49	15	0.39
Rachmaninoff 1923		34	0.68	9	0.02	8	0.12	9	0.42	1	0.61	6	0.51
Rangell 2001		60	0.58	77	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.04	77	0.04
Richter 1976		53	0.61	40	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	36	0.11	66	0.07
Rosen 1989		38	0.68	5	0.02	18	0.07	29	0.23	14	0.44	25	0.32
Rosenthal 1930		40	0.66	74	0.00	54	0.03	75	0.03	20	0.40	53	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.39	80	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.34	78	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.60	33	0.00	63	0.04	56	0.04	32	0.21	58	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.40	58	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		71	0.48	84	0.00	56	0.04	54	0.04	14	0.25	54	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.23	66	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	58	0.05	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		67	0.51	75	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.07	72	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		56	0.59	56	0.00	71	0.04	64	0.04	35	0.17	63	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		42	0.66	45	0.00	34	0.07	28	0.23	16	0.37	32	0.29
Shebanova 2002		47	0.63	48	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	36	0.17	65	0.08
Smith 1975		15	0.77	67	0.00	17	0.07	13	0.39	12	0.30	19	0.34
Sokolov 2002		8	0.80	54	0.00	9	0.12	5	0.51	3	0.51	5	0.51
Sztompka 1959		9	0.80	2	0.16	2	0.18	4	0.52	1	0.57	3	0.54
Tomsic 1995		19	0.73	8	0.02	12	0.10	18	0.30	20	0.36	23	0.33
Uninsky 1932		22	0.72	36	0.00	11	0.08	16	0.32	3	0.52	13	0.41
Uninsky 1971		21	0.72	34	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.25	10	0.46	20	0.34
Wasowski 1980		39	0.67	30	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.09	4	0.39	40	0.19
Zak 1937		51	0.62	35	0.00	46	0.04	59	0.04	24	0.28	51	0.11
Zak 1951		48	0.63	43	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.11	20	0.34	41	0.19
Random 1		90	-0.16	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	65	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	52	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	40	0.12	71	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).