Barbosa 1983

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.71	23	0.01	2	0.12	7	0.49	10	0.39	6	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		75	0.28	76	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	82	0.02	84	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		61	0.40	69	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	76	0.03	67	0.04
Bacha 2000		63	0.40	50	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	34	0.18	49	0.08
Badura 1965		32	0.55	70	0.00	37	0.09	30	0.29	24	0.31	23	0.30
Barbosa 1983		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Biret 1990		26	0.57	14	0.01	12	0.07	8	0.44	15	0.31	12	0.37
Blet 2003		1	0.75	1	0.29	1	0.28	1	0.58	1	0.63	1	0.60
Block 1995		78	0.25	13	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.02	79	0.03	85	0.02
Blumental 1952		76	0.28	57	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	64	0.04	79	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		60	0.41	22	0.01	65	0.04	62	0.04	41	0.13	52	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.43	58	0.00	68	0.04	60	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.04
Bunin 1987		14	0.63	56	0.00	27	0.09	19	0.39	32	0.26	20	0.32
Bunin 1987b		13	0.63	45	0.00	26	0.06	18	0.39	32	0.26	19	0.32
Chiu 1999		4	0.67	6	0.05	3	0.13	6	0.51	2	0.60	2	0.55
Cohen 1997		80	0.24	40	0.00	72	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.12	53	0.07
Cortot 1951		56	0.44	86	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.06	60	0.05
Csalog 1996		37	0.53	3	0.06	11	0.07	22	0.37	11	0.47	8	0.42
Czerny 1949		27	0.57	87	0.00	41	0.07	43	0.18	46	0.07	41	0.11
Czerny 1990		23	0.59	30	0.00	38	0.09	36	0.24	67	0.04	42	0.10
Duchoud 2007		9	0.64	4	0.06	6	0.12	3	0.52	7	0.48	4	0.50
Ezaki 2006		12	0.63	66	0.00	21	0.07	10	0.43	33	0.18	26	0.28
Falvay 1989		22	0.59	77	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.19	61	0.04	45	0.09
Farrell 1958		55	0.45	59	0.00	60	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.04	74	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		36	0.54	88	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.25	33	0.26	28	0.25
Fliere 1977		11	0.63	2	0.10	5	0.12	4	0.52	22	0.27	11	0.37
Fou 1978		44	0.49	5	0.05	7	0.11	32	0.28	38	0.19	32	0.23
Francois 1956		3	0.67	15	0.01	15	0.09	15	0.40	24	0.26	21	0.32
Friedman 1923		86	0.09	31	0.00	80	0.02	81	0.02	56	0.06	80	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.11	39	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	62	0.05	68	0.04
Friedman 1930		81	0.24	71	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	68	0.04	65	0.04
Garcia 2007		82	0.24	46	0.00	77	0.02	80	0.02	49	0.05	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.07	49	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	84	0.02	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		50	0.47	75	0.00	63	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		41	0.52	63	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.05	59	0.05
Groot 1988		6	0.65	17	0.01	9	0.08	2	0.52	21	0.32	10	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		49	0.47	43	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.05	69	0.04
Hatto 1993		72	0.29	9	0.02	32	0.11	40	0.22	26	0.22	33	0.22
Hatto 1997		66	0.37	24	0.01	30	0.06	35	0.25	24	0.29	27	0.27
Horowitz 1949		64	0.39	60	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	77	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		69	0.33	11	0.02	31	0.10	38	0.23	24	0.26	31	0.24
Kapell 1951		24	0.58	72	0.00	36	0.08	29	0.31	39	0.18	30	0.24
Kissin 1993		47	0.47	64	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	54	0.05	58	0.05
Kushner 1989		42	0.49	89	0.00	64	0.06	46	0.06	59	0.04	56	0.05
Luisada 1991		58	0.42	28	0.01	54	0.04	52	0.04	45	0.06	55	0.05
Lushtak 2004		7	0.65	16	0.01	4	0.13	5	0.51	20	0.35	9	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		46	0.48	73	0.00	55	0.04	54	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Magaloff 1978		65	0.38	34	0.00	58	0.03	70	0.03	50	0.04	70	0.03
Magin 1975		84	0.20	61	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.02	82	0.02
Michalowski 1933		71	0.30	55	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	39	0.16	46	0.09
Milkina 1970		51	0.46	78	0.00	56	0.03	69	0.03	50	0.05	63	0.04
Mohovich 1999		15	0.62	8	0.03	10	0.10	12	0.43	25	0.26	16	0.33
Moravec 1969		45	0.49	90	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Morozova 2008		35	0.54	36	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.28	40	0.11	36	0.18
Neighaus 1950		33	0.55	19	0.01	19	0.08	20	0.38	41	0.16	29	0.25
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.34	52	0.00	70	0.04	66	0.04	84	0.02	73	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.57	33	0.00	24	0.06	11	0.43	27	0.22	22	0.31
Osinska 1989		31	0.55	62	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.17	50	0.05	44	0.09
Pachmann 1927		17	0.62	12	0.02	8	0.09	9	0.44	2	0.61	3	0.52
Paderewski 1930		54	0.45	80	0.00	59	0.03	73	0.03	39	0.10	57	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		16	0.62	25	0.01	39	0.10	31	0.29	36	0.12	35	0.19
Pierdomenico 2008		59	0.41	84	0.00	74	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.03	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		28	0.57	44	0.00	17	0.10	14	0.41	24	0.30	14	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		30	0.55	29	0.01	28	0.07	26	0.33	24	0.32	17	0.32
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.49	38	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	67	0.03	71	0.03
Rangell 2001		62	0.40	47	0.00	66	0.04	53	0.04	21	0.23	43	0.10
Richter 1976		52	0.46	42	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	46	0.05	64	0.04
Rosen 1989		53	0.45	20	0.01	46	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.15	47	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.37	82	0.00	75	0.03	68	0.03	71	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		74	0.29	74	0.00	81	0.02	79	0.02	76	0.02	83	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.21	67	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	74	0.03	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.30	85	0.00	78	0.02	77	0.02	83	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.25	37	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	79	0.02	90	0.01
Rossi 2007		77	0.27	68	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.02	81	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		73	0.29	26	0.01	76	0.02	78	0.02	31	0.29	50	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.52	27	0.01	53	0.04	51	0.04	31	0.21	48	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.57	7	0.04	20	0.08	16	0.39	8	0.53	5	0.45
Schilhawsky 1960		18	0.62	32	0.00	14	0.07	24	0.37	41	0.11	34	0.20
Shebanova 2002		34	0.55	54	0.00	34	0.06	28	0.32	29	0.26	25	0.29
Smith 1975		19	0.61	81	0.00	33	0.09	27	0.32	49	0.05	39	0.13
Sokolov 2002		38	0.52	53	0.00	42	0.06	37	0.23	48	0.06	40	0.12
Sztompka 1959		39	0.52	65	0.00	44	0.09	42	0.18	38	0.16	38	0.17
Tomsic 1995		21	0.60	35	0.00	25	0.05	23	0.37	29	0.22	24	0.29
Uninsky 1932		20	0.61	18	0.01	22	0.07	25	0.35	28	0.32	15	0.33
Uninsky 1971		5	0.65	48	0.00	13	0.07	13	0.43	19	0.42	7	0.42
Wasowski 1980		48	0.47	41	0.00	23	0.07	39	0.23	35	0.12	37	0.17
Zak 1937		10	0.63	10	0.02	18	0.12	21	0.37	25	0.27	18	0.32
Zak 1951		8	0.65	21	0.01	16	0.10	17	0.39	23	0.33	13	0.36
Random 1		88	-0.01	51	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	22	0.28	51	0.07
Random 2		89	-0.06	83	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	29	0.18	54	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.10	79	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.04	86	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).