Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.78	16	0.01	4	0.27	4	0.59	2	0.54	4	0.56
Anderszewski 2003		62	0.46	13	0.01	28	0.06	39	0.16	32	0.19	38	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		56	0.52	43	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.10	50	0.04	55	0.06
Bacha 2000		78	0.28	67	0.00	85	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03	69	0.03
Badura 1965		33	0.61	77	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.13	22	0.32	35	0.20
Barbosa 1983		45	0.57	70	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	43	0.18	44	0.11
Biret 1990		23	0.66	25	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.24	32	0.19	34	0.21
Blet 2003		20	0.66	75	0.00	29	0.06	23	0.32	23	0.32	26	0.32
Block 1995		70	0.38	24	0.00	69	0.03	68	0.03	56	0.04	81	0.03
Blumental 1952		55	0.52	10	0.02	13	0.10	28	0.26	6	0.41	24	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		51	0.53	55	0.00	73	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		66	0.40	48	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.04	70	0.03
Bunin 1987		27	0.65	35	0.00	31	0.06	24	0.31	24	0.34	27	0.32
Bunin 1987b		26	0.65	47	0.00	32	0.09	25	0.31	24	0.34	25	0.32
Chiu 1999		67	0.40	78	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.04	71	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.08	71	0.00	87	0.02	83	0.02	75	0.03	84	0.02
Cortot 1951		14	0.70	54	0.00	11	0.14	13	0.43	4	0.53	12	0.48
Csalog 1996		75	0.34	73	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.03	79	0.03
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1990		1	0.89	1	0.47	1	0.46	1	0.74	1	0.69	1	0.71
Duchoud 2007		36	0.60	33	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	36	0.19	41	0.14
Ezaki 2006		7	0.75	22	0.00	9	0.10	12	0.47	12	0.41	13	0.44
Falvay 1989		34	0.61	20	0.01	52	0.06	54	0.06	42	0.09	51	0.07
Farrell 1958		52	0.53	50	0.00	56	0.07	45	0.07	55	0.04	57	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.61	53	0.00	27	0.07	37	0.19	18	0.40	32	0.28
Fliere 1977		22	0.66	89	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	72	0.04	56	0.05
Fou 1978		72	0.36	32	0.00	74	0.05	59	0.05	72	0.04	65	0.04
Francois 1956		2	0.83	2	0.09	2	0.23	2	0.68	1	0.68	2	0.68
Friedman 1923		82	0.22	82	0.00	38	0.10	36	0.19	8	0.46	30	0.30
Friedman 1923b		81	0.23	79	0.00	37	0.08	34	0.20	8	0.45	29	0.30
Friedman 1930		54	0.52	44	0.00	22	0.07	18	0.39	4	0.49	14	0.44
Garcia 2007		80	0.23	64	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03
Garcia 2007b		86	0.12	80	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	73	0.03	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		13	0.70	6	0.03	7	0.10	9	0.52	3	0.44	11	0.48
Gornostaeva 1994		10	0.73	4	0.03	16	0.11	20	0.37	11	0.39	20	0.38
Groot 1988		30	0.63	36	0.00	47	0.05	55	0.05	42	0.11	53	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		47	0.55	63	0.00	39	0.08	35	0.20	42	0.10	42	0.14
Hatto 1993		84	0.19	86	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.02	87	0.02
Hatto 1997		76	0.30	40	0.00	57	0.06	51	0.06	48	0.04	60	0.05
Horowitz 1949		50	0.53	14	0.01	46	0.05	56	0.05	38	0.13	49	0.08
Indjic 1988		83	0.22	87	0.00	66	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.03	77	0.03
Kapell 1951		8	0.74	8	0.03	5	0.22	6	0.54	5	0.53	6	0.53
Kissin 1993		58	0.49	51	0.00	63	0.03	76	0.03	62	0.04	76	0.03
Kushner 1989		18	0.68	49	0.00	24	0.07	27	0.27	23	0.32	31	0.29
Luisada 1991		61	0.47	56	0.00	65	0.03	67	0.03	49	0.05	61	0.04
Lushtak 2004		48	0.55	83	0.00	33	0.09	29	0.26	50	0.05	45	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		11	0.71	7	0.03	12	0.12	5	0.57	10	0.46	8	0.51
Magaloff 1978		49	0.53	27	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.04	62	0.04
Magin 1975		71	0.37	57	0.00	68	0.03	73	0.03	47	0.05	64	0.04
Michalowski 1933		53	0.53	18	0.01	20	0.10	19	0.38	6	0.47	15	0.42
Milkina 1970		64	0.45	19	0.01	43	0.05	44	0.09	47	0.06	52	0.07
Mohovich 1999		19	0.66	21	0.01	36	0.07	30	0.25	30	0.16	36	0.20
Moravec 1969		15	0.70	17	0.01	18	0.10	14	0.42	2	0.58	9	0.49
Morozova 2008		29	0.63	60	0.00	21	0.08	26	0.31	8	0.31	28	0.31
Neighaus 1950		25	0.65	9	0.02	17	0.10	15	0.42	22	0.34	21	0.38
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.52	28	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	56	0.04	63	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.60	46	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.06	59	0.05
Osinska 1989		4	0.79	15	0.01	8	0.09	10	0.51	3	0.55	5	0.53
Pachmann 1927		79	0.25	58	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	61	0.04	75	0.03
Paderewski 1930		38	0.59	12	0.01	54	0.06	53	0.06	34	0.14	47	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.60	81	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	42	0.10	48	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		42	0.58	76	0.00	61	0.03	71	0.03	53	0.04	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		31	0.61	52	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.20	35	0.17	37	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		3	0.80	5	0.03	6	0.15	3	0.59	1	0.65	3	0.62
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.64	34	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.37	8	0.40	18	0.38
Rangell 2001		69	0.38	42	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.03	85	0.02
Richter 1976		65	0.43	66	0.00	70	0.03	66	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.03
Rosen 1989		39	0.58	30	0.00	25	0.08	38	0.19	23	0.36	33	0.26
Rosenthal 1930		21	0.66	45	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.24	3	0.56	22	0.37
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.35	74	0.00	75	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.30	62	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	68	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		40	0.58	61	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	18	0.36	39	0.15
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.34	29	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	66	0.03	86	0.02
Rossi 2007		63	0.46	72	0.00	64	0.03	69	0.03	25	0.17	50	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.18	39	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	66	0.04	73	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		68	0.40	68	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		59	0.47	59	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.05	66	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.65	26	0.00	23	0.07	22	0.36	19	0.34	23	0.35
Shebanova 2002		60	0.47	90	0.00	72	0.03	65	0.03	51	0.06	67	0.04
Smith 1975		9	0.74	41	0.00	14	0.09	11	0.49	13	0.30	19	0.38
Sokolov 2002		12	0.71	11	0.02	15	0.10	7	0.53	8	0.46	10	0.49
Sztompka 1959		5	0.78	3	0.06	3	0.21	8	0.52	5	0.53	7	0.52
Tomsic 1995		43	0.57	38	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	61	0.04	58	0.05
Uninsky 1932		17	0.69	37	0.00	10	0.10	17	0.40	15	0.43	17	0.41
Uninsky 1971		16	0.69	31	0.00	19	0.10	16	0.40	15	0.43	16	0.41
Wasowski 1980		46	0.56	65	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	23	0.24	43	0.12
Zak 1937		44	0.57	84	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.17	46	0.09
Zak 1951		41	0.58	88	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	34	0.21	40	0.14
Random 1		90	-0.25	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.06	23	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	67	0.03	83	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.04	69	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	31	0.18	54	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).