Garcia 2007b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		80	0.04	13	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.40	17	0.01	5	0.15	8	0.39	33	0.19	6	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.33	32	0.00	28	0.06	17	0.24	79	0.03	28	0.08
Bacha 2000		47	0.18	11	0.02	21	0.06	37	0.10	60	0.04	36	0.06
Badura 1965		79	0.05	72	0.00	87	0.01	87	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01
Barbosa 1983		78	0.07	49	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.02
Biret 1990		10	0.35	18	0.01	15	0.06	11	0.27	81	0.02	33	0.07
Blet 2003		61	0.16	22	0.01	62	0.03	69	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.03
Block 1995		53	0.18	23	0.01	17	0.05	22	0.22	46	0.05	21	0.10
Blumental 1952		15	0.31	4	0.06	6	0.13	6	0.41	22	0.22	5	0.30
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.35	43	0.00	27	0.06	23	0.21	75	0.03	27	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.38	12	0.02	7	0.09	7	0.40	48	0.05	14	0.14
Bunin 1987		24	0.27	69	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	77	0.03	72	0.03
Bunin 1987b		23	0.28	53	0.00	46	0.06	45	0.06	78	0.03	48	0.04
Chiu 1999		17	0.31	56	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	79	0.03	45	0.04
Cohen 1997		55	0.17	31	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.03	71	0.03
Cortot 1951		41	0.21	27	0.00	33	0.04	44	0.08	51	0.06	34	0.07
Csalog 1996		89	-0.15	62	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	88	0.01
Czerny 1949		69	0.12	79	0.00	61	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.02	82	0.02
Czerny 1990		63	0.15	80	0.00	56	0.04	51	0.04	80	0.03	73	0.03
Duchoud 2007		40	0.22	81	0.00	48	0.04	54	0.04	81	0.02	68	0.03
Ezaki 2006		37	0.24	36	0.00	50	0.04	58	0.04	87	0.02	55	0.03
Falvay 1989		75	0.08	44	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	60	0.03
Farrell 1958		7	0.38	1	0.27	1	0.27	2	0.60	7	0.33	2	0.44
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.16	73	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.04
Fliere 1977		34	0.25	70	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	70	0.04	42	0.05
Fou 1978		48	0.18	83	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03	61	0.03
Francois 1956		86	-0.01	90	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.02	86	0.02
Friedman 1923		31	0.26	19	0.01	31	0.06	16	0.24	33	0.23	7	0.23
Friedman 1923b		32	0.26	7	0.02	30	0.04	19	0.22	31	0.22	8	0.22
Friedman 1930		19	0.29	40	0.00	25	0.05	18	0.24	70	0.04	20	0.10
Garcia 2007		1	0.53	2	0.23	2	0.31	1	0.62	1	0.68	1	0.65
Garcia 2007b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Gierzod 1998		28	0.27	57	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.09	87	0.02	53	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.26	16	0.01	24	0.05	25	0.19	86	0.02	41	0.06
Groot 1988		74	0.09	33	0.00	75	0.03	66	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		14	0.32	39	0.00	40	0.06	27	0.16	83	0.03	35	0.07
Hatto 1993		18	0.30	86	0.00	26	0.05	14	0.25	30	0.18	9	0.21
Hatto 1997		26	0.27	71	0.00	39	0.06	32	0.14	68	0.03	40	0.06
Horowitz 1949		62	0.15	48	0.00	73	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.03	64	0.03
Indjic 1988		25	0.27	54	0.00	38	0.05	29	0.15	53	0.04	26	0.08
Kapell 1951		59	0.16	84	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	72	0.03	47	0.04
Kissin 1993		82	0.03	85	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	81	0.02	87	0.01
Kushner 1989		33	0.25	67	0.00	13	0.08	24	0.20	84	0.02	37	0.06
Luisada 1991		2	0.47	5	0.05	4	0.20	5	0.43	27	0.26	4	0.33
Lushtak 2004		21	0.28	50	0.00	54	0.04	53	0.04	79	0.03	69	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		43	0.21	75	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	85	0.03	49	0.04
Magaloff 1978		54	0.17	25	0.00	42	0.04	41	0.09	85	0.02	46	0.04
Magin 1975		16	0.31	63	0.00	12	0.10	13	0.26	38	0.14	11	0.19
Michalowski 1933		3	0.43	3	0.06	3	0.17	3	0.55	29	0.30	3	0.41
Milkina 1970		77	0.08	60	0.00	78	0.03	64	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.03
Mohovich 1999		52	0.18	41	0.00	74	0.04	52	0.04	76	0.03	70	0.03
Moravec 1969		88	-0.05	30	0.00	68	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	76	0.02
Morozova 2008		5	0.39	68	0.00	8	0.07	10	0.29	68	0.04	17	0.11
Neighaus 1950		9	0.36	61	0.00	16	0.05	12	0.27	76	0.03	24	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		84	0.02	47	0.00	69	0.03	62	0.03	41	0.10	43	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.28	74	0.00	43	0.04	40	0.09	88	0.02	50	0.04
Osinska 1989		67	0.13	87	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	87	0.02	77	0.02
Pachmann 1927		83	0.02	28	0.00	80	0.02	81	0.02	84	0.03	79	0.02
Paderewski 1930		71	0.10	14	0.01	29	0.04	36	0.11	64	0.03	39	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.17	37	0.00	20	0.06	31	0.15	76	0.03	29	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		12	0.33	8	0.02	10	0.08	15	0.25	60	0.04	18	0.10
Poblocka 1999		57	0.17	58	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03	57	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.27	55	0.00	37	0.05	28	0.16	61	0.04	25	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		50	0.18	77	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	73	0.03	59	0.03
Rangell 2001		45	0.21	42	0.00	34	0.04	38	0.10	82	0.02	54	0.04
Richter 1976		85	0.00	59	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.03	78	0.02
Rosen 1989		20	0.29	88	0.00	35	0.06	30	0.15	71	0.03	32	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.08	65	0.00	65	0.03	68	0.03	83	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		39	0.22	89	0.00	36	0.06	20	0.22	54	0.05	19	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		27	0.27	21	0.01	14	0.07	9	0.35	40	0.11	10	0.20
Rosenthal 1931c		73	0.09	29	0.00	57	0.04	56	0.04	85	0.02	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		44	0.21	64	0.00	22	0.05	26	0.17	54	0.05	23	0.09
Rossi 2007		36	0.24	10	0.02	11	0.06	21	0.22	31	0.14	12	0.18
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.18	26	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	33	0.25	22	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		87	-0.03	51	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1966		81	0.04	82	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.03	81	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.18	9	0.02	23	0.06	39	0.10	72	0.03	44	0.05
Shebanova 2002		64	0.15	38	0.00	77	0.03	70	0.03	82	0.03	67	0.03
Smith 1975		8	0.36	34	0.00	9	0.09	4	0.44	81	0.03	16	0.11
Sokolov 2002		42	0.21	78	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.02	58	0.03
Sztompka 1959		35	0.24	15	0.01	32	0.06	33	0.12	71	0.04	31	0.07
Tomsic 1995		58	0.17	6	0.02	76	0.03	65	0.03	73	0.03	63	0.03
Uninsky 1932		38	0.22	45	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	71	0.04	52	0.04
Uninsky 1971		68	0.13	52	0.00	66	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	65	0.03
Wasowski 1980		66	0.13	76	0.00	72	0.03	67	0.03	83	0.03	56	0.03
Zak 1937		70	0.12	35	0.00	18	0.05	34	0.12	71	0.04	30	0.07
Zak 1951		72	0.10	24	0.01	19	0.07	35	0.11	74	0.03	38	0.06
Random 1		65	0.14	20	0.01	70	0.03	75	0.03	3	0.51	15	0.12
Random 2		90	-0.24	66	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.02	83	0.02
Random 3		46	0.20	46	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.09	18	0.33	13	0.17

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).