Michalowski 1933

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		63	0.27	86	0.00	41	0.07	42	0.13	65	0.04	48	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.60	7	0.03	10	0.13	5	0.47	2	0.57	1	0.52
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.61	3	0.09	3	0.17	3	0.49	16	0.38	13	0.43
Bacha 2000		79	0.11	41	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04
Badura 1965		34	0.39	89	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	64	0.04	64	0.04
Barbosa 1983		58	0.30	60	0.00	38	0.06	39	0.16	48	0.05	41	0.09
Biret 1990		28	0.43	75	0.00	22	0.10	22	0.39	37	0.16	32	0.25
Blet 2003		43	0.36	71	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.37	28	0.21	30	0.28
Block 1995		61	0.29	24	0.01	51	0.05	52	0.05	33	0.18	42	0.09
Blumental 1952		22	0.45	21	0.01	16	0.13	19	0.42	3	0.44	12	0.43
Boshniakovich 1969		45	0.35	39	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		72	0.19	29	0.00	73	0.05	55	0.05	78	0.04	59	0.04
Bunin 1987		30	0.43	66	0.00	32	0.09	24	0.37	34	0.23	29	0.29
Bunin 1987b		29	0.43	58	0.00	33	0.10	25	0.37	34	0.23	28	0.29
Chiu 1999		62	0.27	50	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	74	0.03	60	0.04
Cohen 1997		73	0.19	11	0.02	70	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.04	67	0.04
Cortot 1951		7	0.57	44	0.00	9	0.13	10	0.45	8	0.50	5	0.47
Csalog 1996		86	-0.01	40	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02
Czerny 1949		15	0.53	56	0.00	13	0.11	6	0.47	19	0.38	15	0.42
Czerny 1990		9	0.54	17	0.01	14	0.11	4	0.48	20	0.28	22	0.37
Duchoud 2007		14	0.53	32	0.00	11	0.13	17	0.42	19	0.42	16	0.42
Ezaki 2006		20	0.47	78	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.28	56	0.04	38	0.11
Falvay 1989		77	0.14	30	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03
Farrell 1958		54	0.32	83	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	49	0.05	53	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		21	0.46	6	0.04	5	0.09	15	0.43	12	0.44	10	0.43
Fliere 1977		35	0.39	16	0.01	54	0.05	61	0.05	78	0.03	58	0.04
Fou 1978		85	0.03	69	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.02
Francois 1956		56	0.31	81	0.00	46	0.05	56	0.05	76	0.03	69	0.04
Friedman 1923		50	0.33	72	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.29	7	0.48	23	0.37
Friedman 1923b		51	0.33	54	0.00	28	0.06	30	0.30	7	0.48	21	0.38
Friedman 1930		6	0.59	28	0.01	19	0.08	20	0.41	9	0.44	14	0.42
Garcia 2007		40	0.37	62	0.00	27	0.06	33	0.29	2	0.53	20	0.39
Garcia 2007b		27	0.43	43	0.00	26	0.07	29	0.30	3	0.55	17	0.41
Gierzod 1998		17	0.49	45	0.00	18	0.12	13	0.44	9	0.36	18	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		42	0.36	52	0.00	52	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04	68	0.04
Groot 1988		67	0.24	31	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	81	0.03	82	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.43	42	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	62	0.04	50	0.07
Hatto 1993		47	0.34	55	0.00	31	0.09	28	0.31	12	0.37	26	0.34
Hatto 1997		53	0.32	67	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.34	18	0.37	24	0.35
Horowitz 1949		69	0.21	49	0.00	77	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		57	0.31	76	0.00	30	0.06	36	0.27	16	0.37	27	0.32
Kapell 1951		8	0.56	5	0.05	2	0.16	7	0.46	9	0.51	4	0.48
Kissin 1993		74	0.18	68	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.04	77	0.03
Kushner 1989		31	0.41	8	0.03	25	0.07	35	0.27	32	0.23	31	0.25
Luisada 1991		33	0.40	38	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.22	38	0.15	34	0.18
Lushtak 2004		32	0.40	84	0.00	34	0.11	27	0.32	53	0.04	40	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.38	70	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	44	0.09	44	0.08
Magaloff 1978		46	0.34	10	0.02	59	0.04	62	0.04	74	0.03	70	0.03
Magin 1975		39	0.37	15	0.01	55	0.04	68	0.04	43	0.09	52	0.06
Michalowski 1933		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Milkina 1970		75	0.16	18	0.01	78	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.03
Mohovich 1999		60	0.29	26	0.01	61	0.05	51	0.05	66	0.03	66	0.04
Moravec 1969		66	0.26	13	0.01	47	0.07	45	0.07	67	0.04	55	0.05
Morozova 2008		25	0.44	14	0.01	42	0.05	41	0.14	51	0.05	45	0.08
Neighaus 1950		24	0.44	47	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.29	54	0.05	37	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.23	64	0.00	65	0.06	49	0.06	44	0.08	47	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.49	77	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.40	40	0.13	33	0.23
Osinska 1989		23	0.44	36	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	48	0.05	46	0.07
Pachmann 1927		88	-0.03	59	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	77	0.03	85	0.02
Paderewski 1930		13	0.53	22	0.01	20	0.10	14	0.44	7	0.42	9	0.43
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.34	4	0.05	39	0.07	38	0.21	34	0.15	35	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		48	0.34	51	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	73	0.03	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		19	0.49	19	0.01	6	0.08	8	0.46	13	0.44	7	0.45
Rabcewiczowa 1932		1	0.65	9	0.02	7	0.08	11	0.45	3	0.52	3	0.48
Rachmaninoff 1923		55	0.31	33	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	63	0.04	56	0.05
Rangell 2001		64	0.26	12	0.01	72	0.05	53	0.05	83	0.02	81	0.03
Richter 1976		70	0.21	25	0.01	69	0.05	58	0.05	75	0.03	62	0.04
Rosen 1989		38	0.38	34	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		44	0.35	87	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	44	0.09	49	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.08	88	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.09	90	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		59	0.29	74	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	40	0.12	51	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.05	80	0.00	84	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		41	0.37	37	0.00	53	0.04	67	0.04	29	0.16	43	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		90	-0.09	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1952		87	-0.02	61	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	77	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		80	0.10	53	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.03	78	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		16	0.51	27	0.01	17	0.09	16	0.43	18	0.36	19	0.39
Shebanova 2002		52	0.32	23	0.01	58	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.05	63	0.04
Smith 1975		5	0.59	20	0.01	8	0.10	12	0.45	25	0.25	25	0.34
Sokolov 2002		11	0.53	2	0.12	4	0.12	1	0.54	20	0.38	8	0.45
Sztompka 1959		2	0.65	1	0.27	1	0.26	2	0.50	4	0.53	2	0.51
Tomsic 1995		65	0.26	79	0.00	67	0.05	50	0.05	72	0.03	61	0.04
Uninsky 1932		10	0.54	48	0.00	15	0.11	18	0.42	11	0.44	11	0.43
Uninsky 1971		12	0.53	35	0.00	12	0.19	9	0.45	6	0.48	6	0.46
Wasowski 1980		36	0.39	57	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.14	42	0.09	39	0.11
Zak 1937		78	0.12	63	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.03	73	0.03
Zak 1951		76	0.15	82	0.00	74	0.04	73	0.04	85	0.03	75	0.03
Random 1		89	-0.05	85	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.06	79	0.03
Random 2		84	0.04	65	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	31	0.18	54	0.06
Random 3		71	0.20	46	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	6	0.48	36	0.14

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).