Falvay 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.74	11	0.02	21	0.10	20	0.31	25	0.27	26	0.29
Anderszewski 2003		74	0.41	68	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	52	0.04	71	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.58	24	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.12	38	0.13	45	0.12
Bacha 2000		35	0.66	16	0.01	35	0.06	34	0.16	3	0.55	22	0.30
Badura 1965		70	0.49	30	0.00	56	0.04	56	0.04	58	0.04	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		50	0.59	76	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.19	53	0.09
Biret 1990		43	0.62	13	0.02	31	0.05	30	0.19	19	0.30	32	0.24
Blet 2003		36	0.64	38	0.00	48	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.04
Block 1995		42	0.62	77	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	31	0.22	54	0.09
Blumental 1952		79	0.34	39	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.03	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		39	0.63	22	0.01	47	0.04	70	0.04	32	0.19	55	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		10	0.76	28	0.00	16	0.08	14	0.38	1	0.56	11	0.46
Bunin 1987		57	0.57	65	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Bunin 1987b		58	0.57	57	0.00	72	0.05	48	0.05	58	0.04	68	0.04
Chiu 1999		37	0.64	33	0.00	24	0.08	27	0.23	9	0.49	17	0.34
Cohen 1997		73	0.47	21	0.01	59	0.04	62	0.04	5	0.49	41	0.14
Cortot 1951		71	0.48	47	0.00	81	0.03	86	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		38	0.63	23	0.01	46	0.05	54	0.05	5	0.54	39	0.16
Czerny 1949		45	0.61	20	0.01	39	0.05	42	0.09	54	0.06	59	0.07
Czerny 1990		24	0.70	80	0.00	30	0.07	36	0.15	55	0.04	58	0.08
Duchoud 2007		64	0.52	49	0.00	70	0.04	55	0.04	70	0.03	80	0.03
Ezaki 2006		17	0.74	18	0.01	27	0.11	19	0.31	24	0.27	24	0.29
Falvay 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Farrell 1958		47	0.61	34	0.00	65	0.06	45	0.06	15	0.27	42	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.55	36	0.00	76	0.04	66	0.04	43	0.09	61	0.06
Fliere 1977		13	0.75	79	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.39	17	0.32	16	0.35
Fou 1978		4	0.81	17	0.01	6	0.12	4	0.61	3	0.57	5	0.59
Francois 1956		14	0.75	10	0.03	11	0.12	10	0.42	6	0.52	10	0.47
Friedman 1923		89	-0.15	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.03	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		88	-0.14	87	0.00	89	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		84	0.13	83	0.00	84	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.03
Garcia 2007		82	0.27	45	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	52	0.04	81	0.03
Garcia 2007b		85	0.08	69	0.00	85	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		33	0.66	4	0.10	9	0.10	22	0.30	14	0.32	21	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		27	0.68	61	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.16	36	0.18	38	0.17
Groot 1988		2	0.84	3	0.12	3	0.14	3	0.61	1	0.64	3	0.62
Harasiewicz 1955		48	0.60	31	0.00	26	0.08	26	0.25	26	0.28	27	0.26
Hatto 1993		81	0.28	84	0.00	53	0.03	78	0.03	45	0.05	74	0.04
Hatto 1997		76	0.37	32	0.00	37	0.06	41	0.11	40	0.10	49	0.10
Horowitz 1949		31	0.67	19	0.01	8	0.12	15	0.35	6	0.48	15	0.41
Indjic 1988		80	0.32	44	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.07	42	0.09	57	0.08
Kapell 1951		49	0.59	35	0.00	66	0.05	49	0.05	47	0.06	64	0.05
Kissin 1993		1	0.84	1	0.17	1	0.17	6	0.54	5	0.57	6	0.55
Kushner 1989		21	0.71	41	0.00	41	0.05	37	0.14	34	0.22	36	0.18
Luisada 1991		40	0.62	56	0.00	32	0.06	29	0.19	24	0.30	30	0.24
Lushtak 2004		29	0.68	58	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.26	24	0.25	28	0.25
Malcuzynski 1961		15	0.74	53	0.00	23	0.10	18	0.31	20	0.30	23	0.30
Magaloff 1978		12	0.75	9	0.03	10	0.11	8	0.47	3	0.48	9	0.47
Magin 1975		61	0.53	46	0.00	50	0.03	74	0.03	45	0.07	63	0.05
Michalowski 1933		83	0.14	40	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.79	5	0.07	5	0.17	1	0.67	1	0.66	1	0.66
Mohovich 1999		6	0.81	74	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.42	10	0.46	13	0.44
Moravec 1969		26	0.69	50	0.00	40	0.04	38	0.13	10	0.46	29	0.24
Morozova 2008		41	0.62	27	0.00	34	0.06	32	0.16	19	0.20	37	0.18
Neighaus 1950		20	0.71	59	0.00	22	0.07	17	0.33	23	0.33	20	0.33
Niedzielski 1931		72	0.48	29	0.00	58	0.04	69	0.04	11	0.36	44	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.61	52	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.17	17	0.32	33	0.23
Osinska 1989		22	0.71	70	0.00	29	0.06	35	0.15	26	0.25	34	0.19
Pachmann 1927		32	0.66	62	0.00	25	0.08	28	0.21	8	0.52	19	0.33
Paderewski 1930		59	0.55	88	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	80	0.02	76	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.73	54	0.00	20	0.07	23	0.28	22	0.31	25	0.29
Pierdomenico 2008		23	0.70	26	0.00	14	0.08	12	0.39	1	0.55	12	0.46
Poblocka 1999		28	0.68	14	0.02	42	0.05	39	0.13	27	0.25	35	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.51	51	0.00	73	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.04	67	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		68	0.50	71	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.10	60	0.06
Rangell 2001		54	0.58	66	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	37	0.16	56	0.09
Richter 1976		19	0.72	6	0.04	17	0.07	24	0.27	9	0.40	18	0.33
Rosen 1989		30	0.67	48	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.07	32	0.26	43	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.52	42	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	42	0.10	66	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		62	0.53	63	0.00	60	0.03	72	0.03	27	0.32	48	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.51	72	0.00	61	0.05	47	0.05	28	0.22	51	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		52	0.59	75	0.00	62	0.05	51	0.05	26	0.24	47	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		51	0.59	81	0.00	52	0.03	73	0.03	16	0.35	50	0.10
Rossi 2007		78	0.35	82	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	53	0.03	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.36	37	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	22	0.37	46	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		8	0.79	12	0.02	13	0.15	9	0.43	3	0.63	8	0.52
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.66	55	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	20	0.43	40	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		56	0.57	64	0.00	64	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05	65	0.05
Shebanova 2002		11	0.75	67	0.00	19	0.07	16	0.34	7	0.51	14	0.42
Smith 1975		25	0.70	7	0.03	18	0.07	21	0.31	33	0.19	31	0.24
Sokolov 2002		46	0.61	73	0.00	63	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.06	62	0.05
Sztompka 1959		67	0.50	89	0.00	77	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.05	69	0.04
Tomsic 1995		3	0.83	15	0.01	7	0.18	7	0.49	4	0.55	7	0.52
Uninsky 1932		75	0.39	78	0.00	82	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.03	79	0.03
Uninsky 1971		69	0.49	43	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	53	0.05	70	0.04
Wasowski 1980		55	0.58	25	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	24	0.22	52	0.09
Zak 1937		9	0.79	8	0.03	4	0.14	5	0.60	3	0.60	4	0.60
Zak 1951		5	0.81	2	0.13	2	0.17	2	0.63	2	0.62	2	0.62
Random 1		87	-0.11	85	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	64	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.19	60	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02
Random 3		86	-0.02	90	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).