Friedman 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.26	74	0.00	36	0.05	39	0.12	62	0.04	42	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.40	77	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.13	59	0.04	41	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.45	17	0.01	29	0.06	25	0.33	56	0.04	32	0.11
Bacha 2000		85	0.00	78	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.02
Badura 1965		30	0.39	27	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	57	0.04	49	0.06
Barbosa 1983		56	0.24	23	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Biret 1990		43	0.31	79	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	73	0.03	66	0.04
Blet 2003		38	0.33	53	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.30	40	0.12	20	0.19
Block 1995		73	0.13	54	0.00	60	0.04	71	0.04	75	0.03	80	0.03
Blumental 1952		51	0.27	50	0.00	20	0.07	35	0.17	20	0.24	19	0.20
Boshniakovich 1969		60	0.23	43	0.00	68	0.05	64	0.05	79	0.03	65	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		82	0.05	47	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	82	0.03	83	0.02
Bunin 1987		10	0.48	32	0.00	11	0.10	10	0.43	27	0.30	12	0.36
Bunin 1987b		11	0.48	56	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.43	27	0.30	11	0.36
Chiu 1999		62	0.22	24	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03	69	0.03
Cohen 1997		83	0.03	60	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	72	0.03	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		27	0.41	48	0.00	18	0.08	14	0.40	27	0.29	13	0.34
Csalog 1996		87	-0.10	59	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		5	0.52	34	0.00	5	0.13	4	0.49	18	0.39	6	0.44
Czerny 1990		21	0.43	64	0.00	17	0.10	19	0.37	52	0.05	25	0.14
Duchoud 2007		19	0.44	68	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.37	39	0.18	17	0.26
Ezaki 2006		15	0.46	86	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.35	47	0.06	23	0.14
Falvay 1989		74	0.13	80	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.03
Farrell 1958		47	0.28	81	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.04	56	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.28	69	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	38	0.17	36	0.09
Fliere 1977		34	0.38	7	0.03	35	0.06	34	0.18	76	0.03	40	0.07
Fou 1978		78	0.11	21	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.03
Francois 1956		32	0.38	62	0.00	24	0.06	29	0.30	74	0.03	37	0.09
Friedman 1923		1	0.64	1	0.38	1	0.37	1	0.69	2	0.76	1	0.72
Friedman 1923b		2	0.63	2	0.15	2	0.50	2	0.67	2	0.75	2	0.71
Friedman 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007		71	0.16	57	0.00	55	0.05	50	0.05	78	0.03	64	0.04
Garcia 2007b		45	0.29	41	0.00	48	0.04	70	0.04	18	0.24	35	0.10
Gierzod 1998		14	0.46	12	0.01	13	0.11	15	0.40	29	0.19	15	0.28
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.41	5	0.05	15	0.08	16	0.39	51	0.04	31	0.12
Groot 1988		59	0.23	87	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.17	77	0.03	44	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.41	19	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.18	85	0.03	45	0.07
Hatto 1993		46	0.29	8	0.02	41	0.04	44	0.08	39	0.09	39	0.08
Hatto 1997		39	0.33	67	0.00	45	0.05	62	0.05	36	0.12	38	0.08
Horowitz 1949		57	0.24	37	0.00	71	0.05	48	0.05	82	0.03	59	0.04
Indjic 1988		50	0.27	46	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.07	47	0.06
Kapell 1951		17	0.44	13	0.01	19	0.08	13	0.41	33	0.27	14	0.33
Kissin 1993		77	0.11	65	0.00	79	0.05	57	0.05	79	0.03	61	0.04
Kushner 1989		41	0.32	72	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	80	0.03	57	0.04
Luisada 1991		64	0.22	75	0.00	67	0.05	56	0.05	85	0.02	68	0.03
Lushtak 2004		23	0.42	39	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.35	62	0.04	30	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.39	55	0.00	32	0.10	24	0.34	73	0.03	33	0.10
Magaloff 1978		36	0.35	4	0.06	14	0.08	30	0.29	44	0.09	21	0.16
Magin 1975		61	0.23	35	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	83	0.02	73	0.03
Michalowski 1933		3	0.59	16	0.01	9	0.09	9	0.44	20	0.41	7	0.42
Milkina 1970		86	-0.01	88	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.02	84	0.02
Mohovich 1999		53	0.26	89	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.14	54	0.04	43	0.07
Moravec 1969		63	0.22	38	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.05
Morozova 2008		31	0.39	42	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.11	75	0.03	48	0.06
Neighaus 1950		13	0.47	58	0.00	23	0.06	17	0.38	55	0.05	26	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.13	44	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	79	0.02	72	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.36	61	0.00	46	0.05	58	0.05	66	0.03	60	0.04
Osinska 1989		44	0.31	22	0.00	52	0.05	51	0.05	75	0.03	54	0.04
Pachmann 1927		84	0.01	28	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	79	0.03	78	0.03
Paderewski 1930		24	0.42	9	0.01	16	0.09	18	0.37	12	0.38	9	0.37
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.25	76	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.09	60	0.04	46	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		40	0.32	26	0.00	61	0.05	63	0.05	84	0.02	71	0.03
Poblocka 1999		42	0.31	66	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.09	71	0.03	51	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		6	0.52	29	0.00	10	0.09	12	0.41	17	0.40	8	0.40
Rachmaninoff 1923		12	0.48	15	0.01	7	0.09	7	0.46	21	0.28	10	0.36
Rangell 2001		65	0.19	82	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	78	0.02	81	0.03
Richter 1976		79	0.10	20	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03
Rosen 1989		33	0.38	45	0.00	34	0.06	31	0.24	52	0.04	34	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		7	0.51	6	0.03	6	0.11	6	0.48	7	0.54	3	0.51
Rosenthal 1931		52	0.27	36	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.04	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		49	0.27	31	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	52	0.05	52	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		20	0.43	30	0.00	30	0.06	26	0.32	29	0.22	16	0.27
Rosenthal 1931d		66	0.19	83	0.00	64	0.05	61	0.05	65	0.04	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		58	0.24	84	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	68	0.03	55	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		88	-0.12	51	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	85	0.02	89	0.01
Rubinstein 1952		89	-0.14	40	0.00	88	0.01	87	0.01	72	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		81	0.06	33	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.02	85	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		9	0.48	10	0.01	22	0.08	21	0.35	45	0.07	22	0.16
Shebanova 2002		80	0.08	49	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03
Smith 1975		8	0.50	14	0.01	8	0.11	8	0.45	56	0.04	27	0.13
Sokolov 2002		22	0.42	25	0.00	31	0.07	28	0.30	50	0.05	29	0.12
Sztompka 1959		4	0.56	3	0.10	3	0.21	3	0.54	12	0.45	4	0.49
Tomsic 1995		67	0.19	73	0.00	62	0.05	52	0.05	83	0.03	58	0.04
Uninsky 1932		18	0.44	11	0.01	4	0.18	5	0.48	14	0.44	5	0.46
Uninsky 1971		37	0.34	52	0.00	27	0.07	32	0.23	43	0.17	18	0.20
Wasowski 1980		70	0.16	18	0.01	65	0.04	73	0.04	50	0.05	53	0.04
Zak 1937		72	0.15	85	0.00	74	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	75	0.03
Zak 1951		68	0.18	63	0.00	73	0.04	65	0.04	82	0.03	76	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.16	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.03	86	0.02
Random 2		76	0.11	71	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	5	0.46	24	0.14
Random 3		69	0.18	70	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	8	0.45	28	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).