Rosenthal 1931b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		71	0.29	44	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	85	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.52	60	0.00	9	0.11	26	0.24	38	0.13	20	0.18
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.45	61	0.00	21	0.06	42	0.10	84	0.02	61	0.04
Bacha 2000		43	0.43	62	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.05	53	0.04
Badura 1965		75	0.26	63	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	73	0.03	70	0.03
Barbosa 1983		77	0.21	18	0.00	80	0.03	74	0.03	88	0.01	80	0.02
Biret 1990		46	0.41	45	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	85	0.02	72	0.03
Blet 2003		61	0.34	46	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	87	0.02	81	0.02
Block 1995		14	0.56	17	0.00	19	0.07	20	0.32	25	0.26	11	0.29
Blumental 1952		82	0.18	30	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.02	87	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		34	0.47	47	0.00	23	0.06	19	0.36	33	0.19	16	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.64	64	0.00	5	0.23	6	0.50	7	0.46	6	0.48
Bunin 1987		28	0.49	65	0.00	42	0.05	34	0.16	44	0.09	30	0.12
Bunin 1987b		29	0.49	66	0.00	41	0.05	32	0.17	44	0.09	27	0.12
Chiu 1999		65	0.33	48	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.05
Cohen 1997		51	0.38	12	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	25	0.28	29	0.12
Cortot 1951		74	0.27	49	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		78	0.21	19	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		70	0.30	31	0.00	71	0.03	68	0.03	70	0.03	69	0.03
Czerny 1990		60	0.34	27	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	81	0.03	71	0.03
Duchoud 2007		53	0.38	50	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.02	86	0.02
Ezaki 2006		33	0.47	11	0.00	44	0.05	41	0.10	84	0.02	52	0.04
Falvay 1989		21	0.51	36	0.00	16	0.06	28	0.22	47	0.05	33	0.10
Farrell 1958		20	0.51	51	0.00	47	0.08	44	0.08	32	0.14	31	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.24	15	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	82	0.02
Fliere 1977		8	0.59	67	0.00	18	0.08	13	0.41	54	0.05	24	0.14
Fou 1978		11	0.57	16	0.00	14	0.12	7	0.46	33	0.31	7	0.38
Francois 1956		47	0.40	23	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.09	67	0.04	45	0.06
Friedman 1923		86	0.14	68	0.00	58	0.03	67	0.03	58	0.05	62	0.04
Friedman 1923b		85	0.16	69	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	47	0.07	51	0.05
Friedman 1930		72	0.27	20	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.05
Garcia 2007		50	0.39	37	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	37	0.18	39	0.09
Garcia 2007b		73	0.27	38	0.00	34	0.05	40	0.11	9	0.35	19	0.20
Gierzod 1998		22	0.51	13	0.00	15	0.07	38	0.13	71	0.03	44	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		9	0.59	9	0.00	8	0.12	12	0.42	25	0.26	9	0.33
Groot 1988		12	0.56	32	0.00	6	0.12	9	0.43	33	0.17	14	0.27
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.49	24	0.00	10	0.11	8	0.44	31	0.19	12	0.29
Hatto 1993		58	0.35	21	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.03	73	0.03
Hatto 1997		59	0.34	70	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	82	0.02	68	0.03
Horowitz 1949		16	0.55	52	0.00	12	0.09	11	0.42	20	0.31	8	0.36
Indjic 1988		64	0.33	71	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.03	57	0.04
Kapell 1951		66	0.33	72	0.00	79	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.02	78	0.02
Kissin 1993		32	0.48	5	0.00	20	0.07	22	0.29	53	0.05	28	0.12
Kushner 1989		10	0.58	53	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.32	69	0.03	34	0.10
Luisada 1991		35	0.47	54	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	69	0.03	54	0.04
Lushtak 2004		62	0.34	73	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	68	0.03	59	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.60	55	0.00	17	0.08	14	0.40	45	0.07	22	0.17
Magaloff 1978		4	0.70	74	0.00	4	0.41	4	0.67	12	0.42	5	0.53
Magin 1975		13	0.56	75	0.00	24	0.07	16	0.38	31	0.21	13	0.28
Michalowski 1933		87	0.09	76	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.03
Milkina 1970		15	0.55	56	0.00	13	0.09	15	0.40	34	0.21	10	0.29
Mohovich 1999		24	0.50	77	0.00	27	0.07	27	0.23	80	0.03	42	0.08
Moravec 1969		57	0.35	10	0.00	76	0.02	80	0.02	78	0.03	74	0.02
Morozova 2008		44	0.42	78	0.00	30	0.06	24	0.28	78	0.03	38	0.09
Neighaus 1950		23	0.50	79	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.26	64	0.04	35	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		67	0.33	80	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	46	0.05	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.38	81	0.00	66	0.04	59	0.04	80	0.03	65	0.03
Osinska 1989		56	0.35	82	0.00	68	0.04	63	0.04	78	0.03	63	0.03
Pachmann 1927		49	0.39	83	0.00	32	0.07	29	0.21	32	0.23	18	0.22
Paderewski 1930		54	0.37	25	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.03	64	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.43	84	0.00	37	0.06	30	0.18	46	0.05	36	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		27	0.49	85	0.00	26	0.11	18	0.37	36	0.15	17	0.24
Poblocka 1999		63	0.34	86	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.03	76	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		79	0.20	8	0.00	82	0.02	81	0.02	88	0.02	77	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.46	26	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.28	42	0.10	21	0.17
Rangell 2001		17	0.53	33	0.00	22	0.06	17	0.37	57	0.05	25	0.14
Richter 1976		36	0.47	39	0.00	36	0.04	33	0.17	54	0.04	41	0.08
Rosen 1989		25	0.50	40	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	74	0.03	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		5	0.67	7	0.00	7	0.12	5	0.58	4	0.55	4	0.56
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.97	1	0.55	1	0.54	1	0.97	1	0.98	1	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.79	3	0.01	3	0.47	3	0.78	1	0.80	3	0.79
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.96	2	0.43	2	0.93	2	0.97	1	0.96	2	0.96
Rossi 2007		84	0.17	87	0.00	35	0.04	45	0.08	76	0.03	46	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.37	22	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.14	9	0.48	15	0.26
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.40	41	0.00	40	0.07	35	0.15	33	0.18	23	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.41	57	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.05	48	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.48	88	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	66	0.04	58	0.04
Shebanova 2002		68	0.32	28	0.00	75	0.02	79	0.02	78	0.03	84	0.02
Smith 1975		18	0.53	4	0.00	11	0.11	10	0.42	61	0.04	26	0.13
Sokolov 2002		37	0.46	34	0.00	50	0.05	46	0.05	76	0.03	55	0.04
Sztompka 1959		81	0.18	29	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.02	79	0.02
Tomsic 1995		42	0.43	42	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.11	52	0.04	43	0.07
Uninsky 1932		83	0.17	14	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	83	0.02
Uninsky 1971		69	0.31	6	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.03	67	0.03
Wasowski 1980		80	0.20	58	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	79	0.03	75	0.02
Zak 1937		39	0.46	59	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.14	57	0.05	40	0.08
Zak 1951		31	0.48	43	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.18	57	0.05	37	0.09
Random 1		88	0.06	89	0.00	60	0.03	66	0.03	9	0.42	32	0.11
Random 2		90	-0.02	90	0.00	88	0.01	87	0.01	17	0.30	50	0.05
Random 3		89	0.02	35	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).