Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.72	51	0.00	32	0.07	22	0.32	29	0.23	30	0.27
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.60	6	0.04	7	0.08	19	0.33	13	0.48	17	0.40
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.73	7	0.03	9	0.09	6	0.51	12	0.45	7	0.48
Bacha 2000		33	0.66	54	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	20	0.33	45	0.11
Badura 1965		65	0.49	12	0.01	46	0.04	52	0.04	34	0.22	47	0.09
Barbosa 1983		53	0.57	26	0.01	24	0.06	24	0.30	14	0.41	20	0.35
Biret 1990		4	0.78	47	0.00	11	0.10	5	0.53	4	0.49	5	0.51
Blet 2003		11	0.74	48	0.00	16	0.08	9	0.48	14	0.40	13	0.44
Block 1995		64	0.51	56	0.00	79	0.03	72	0.03	47	0.05	65	0.04
Blumental 1952		75	0.43	29	0.00	31	0.08	38	0.15	18	0.24	34	0.19
Boshniakovich 1969		52	0.57	13	0.01	69	0.03	78	0.03	59	0.04	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.59	60	0.00	73	0.04	53	0.04	47	0.06	55	0.05
Bunin 1987		46	0.62	42	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	41	0.12	49	0.08
Bunin 1987b		45	0.62	46	0.00	50	0.04	67	0.04	40	0.12	52	0.07
Chiu 1999		74	0.43	61	0.00	60	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04
Cohen 1997		68	0.48	18	0.01	6	0.08	41	0.13	6	0.48	32	0.25
Cortot 1951		14	0.73	32	0.00	21	0.10	14	0.43	9	0.48	12	0.45
Csalog 1996		24	0.69	2	0.14	4	0.14	21	0.32	3	0.57	14	0.43
Czerny 1949		47	0.61	82	0.00	41	0.05	35	0.17	33	0.20	36	0.18
Czerny 1990		15	0.72	78	0.00	25	0.08	16	0.42	30	0.23	27	0.31
Duchoud 2007		6	0.75	21	0.01	10	0.08	7	0.50	10	0.46	6	0.48
Ezaki 2006		7	0.75	10	0.01	19	0.10	10	0.48	27	0.24	23	0.34
Falvay 1989		29	0.68	35	0.00	33	0.06	27	0.25	39	0.13	35	0.18
Farrell 1958		34	0.66	43	0.00	62	0.04	49	0.04	38	0.11	51	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		2	0.81	3	0.06	2	0.15	3	0.57	2	0.64	2	0.60
Fliere 1977		5	0.76	9	0.01	26	0.09	20	0.33	49	0.05	42	0.13
Fou 1978		63	0.52	40	0.00	74	0.03	68	0.03	67	0.04	72	0.03
Francois 1956		44	0.62	59	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.15	39	0.12	44	0.13
Friedman 1923		88	0.10	75	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	61	0.05	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		87	0.11	76	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	71	0.05	66	0.04
Friedman 1930		82	0.31	66	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	42	0.09	58	0.05
Garcia 2007		76	0.43	62	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	38	0.17	53	0.07
Garcia 2007b		85	0.17	68	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		13	0.73	11	0.01	27	0.11	15	0.43	6	0.38	18	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		42	0.62	33	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.03	82	0.03
Groot 1988		26	0.68	25	0.01	56	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.04	67	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		79	0.36	38	0.00	55	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1993		72	0.46	36	0.00	15	0.11	31	0.24	9	0.42	25	0.32
Hatto 1997		56	0.55	4	0.05	8	0.09	26	0.28	11	0.43	21	0.35
Horowitz 1949		70	0.47	83	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		67	0.49	28	0.00	14	0.10	29	0.24	10	0.42	24	0.32
Kapell 1951		1	0.84	1	0.34	1	0.34	1	0.64	1	0.58	1	0.61
Kissin 1993		43	0.62	49	0.00	64	0.03	69	0.03	52	0.05	64	0.04
Kushner 1989		30	0.68	34	0.00	52	0.03	73	0.03	61	0.04	73	0.03
Luisada 1991		48	0.60	23	0.01	35	0.06	36	0.17	39	0.14	38	0.15
Lushtak 2004		19	0.71	5	0.05	3	0.15	2	0.58	5	0.54	3	0.56
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.69	14	0.01	61	0.04	55	0.04	72	0.03	75	0.03
Magaloff 1978		28	0.68	37	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	53	0.04	50	0.07
Magin 1975		69	0.47	22	0.01	76	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.03	71	0.03
Michalowski 1933		66	0.49	27	0.01	17	0.09	13	0.44	8	0.46	11	0.45
Milkina 1970		35	0.65	84	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.04	74	0.03
Mohovich 1999		17	0.72	30	0.00	37	0.06	32	0.21	35	0.12	37	0.16
Moravec 1969		40	0.64	65	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	25	0.29	46	0.11
Morozova 2008		61	0.52	45	0.00	54	0.04	56	0.04	71	0.03	77	0.03
Neighaus 1950		31	0.66	67	0.00	39	0.04	42	0.12	40	0.17	41	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		60	0.54	63	0.00	67	0.05	47	0.05	14	0.33	43	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.80	16	0.01	5	0.10	4	0.55	6	0.54	4	0.54
Osinska 1989		10	0.74	31	0.00	23	0.07	18	0.40	8	0.42	15	0.41
Pachmann 1927		73	0.44	57	0.00	80	0.04	50	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.04
Paderewski 1930		8	0.75	8	0.03	18	0.08	17	0.41	4	0.49	10	0.45
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.54	24	0.01	49	0.03	75	0.03	52	0.05	59	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.52	79	0.00	72	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.03	70	0.03
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rabcewiczowa 1932		36	0.65	58	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.21	22	0.35	28	0.27
Rachmaninoff 1923		78	0.40	80	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	81	0.03	69	0.03
Rangell 2001		27	0.68	19	0.01	43	0.04	43	0.11	33	0.19	40	0.14
Richter 1976		39	0.64	15	0.01	36	0.06	33	0.21	12	0.36	29	0.27
Rosen 1989		32	0.66	72	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	41	0.16	48	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		57	0.55	71	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.34	87	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.34	88	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	82	0.02	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		51	0.59	73	0.00	75	0.04	51	0.04	65	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.42	69	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	73	0.03	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		84	0.21	77	0.00	81	0.03	70	0.03	50	0.04	68	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.30	85	0.00	47	0.04	60	0.04	46	0.06	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		54	0.56	50	0.00	45	0.04	48	0.04	44	0.09	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.64	53	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	46	0.05	57	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		22	0.69	39	0.00	12	0.13	11	0.48	8	0.47	8	0.47
Shebanova 2002		20	0.71	20	0.01	29	0.07	25	0.28	19	0.43	22	0.35
Smith 1975		25	0.69	41	0.00	13	0.10	8	0.49	10	0.32	16	0.40
Sokolov 2002		18	0.72	86	0.00	34	0.07	28	0.25	31	0.27	31	0.26
Sztompka 1959		9	0.75	17	0.01	20	0.13	12	0.47	10	0.46	9	0.46
Tomsic 1995		21	0.70	64	0.00	40	0.04	40	0.15	38	0.13	39	0.14
Uninsky 1932		71	0.46	81	0.00	30	0.09	37	0.16	34	0.22	33	0.19
Uninsky 1971		37	0.65	52	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.32	22	0.40	19	0.36
Wasowski 1980		41	0.63	70	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.24	2	0.41	26	0.31
Zak 1937		55	0.56	55	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	63	0.04	61	0.04
Zak 1951		59	0.54	44	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	55	0.05	62	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.11	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	79	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.06	74	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	45	0.05	78	0.03
Random 3		86	0.14	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	53	0.05	81	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).