Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.51	79	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.03	66	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		46	0.53	14	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.17	55	0.04	38	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.61	74	0.00	35	0.05	24	0.28	47	0.05	30	0.12
Bacha 2000		70	0.40	11	0.01	87	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02
Badura 1965		45	0.53	18	0.00	10	0.14	15	0.39	17	0.40	8	0.39
Barbosa 1983		79	0.30	88	0.00	79	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.02	89	0.02
Biret 1990		55	0.50	55	0.00	58	0.03	64	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Blet 2003		51	0.51	83	0.00	55	0.05	51	0.05	72	0.03	63	0.04
Block 1995		42	0.54	75	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.09	43	0.11	34	0.10
Blumental 1952		74	0.34	20	0.00	66	0.03	63	0.03	66	0.03	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		34	0.57	59	0.00	27	0.07	35	0.18	44	0.10	29	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.50	37	0.00	62	0.03	66	0.03	71	0.04	70	0.03
Bunin 1987		22	0.59	60	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.31	37	0.16	18	0.22
Bunin 1987b		24	0.59	35	0.00	21	0.08	23	0.30	37	0.16	17	0.22
Chiu 1999		83	0.24	53	0.00	70	0.03	67	0.03	75	0.03	73	0.03
Cohen 1997		72	0.37	29	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	46	0.05	68	0.04
Cortot 1951		23	0.59	21	0.00	31	0.05	39	0.12	55	0.05	41	0.08
Csalog 1996		71	0.37	56	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.04	77	0.03
Czerny 1949		30	0.58	61	0.00	24	0.07	18	0.36	49	0.06	27	0.15
Czerny 1990		21	0.60	76	0.00	33	0.05	32	0.21	56	0.04	37	0.09
Duchoud 2007		39	0.56	47	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	59	0.04	67	0.04
Ezaki 2006		13	0.67	24	0.00	14	0.11	10	0.47	41	0.09	19	0.21
Falvay 1989		27	0.59	15	0.00	38	0.06	26	0.24	51	0.05	31	0.11
Farrell 1958		35	0.57	31	0.00	52	0.04	59	0.04	76	0.03	75	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.49	46	0.00	73	0.03	72	0.03	60	0.04	78	0.03
Fliere 1977		7	0.71	58	0.00	9	0.15	11	0.47	41	0.12	16	0.24
Fou 1978		41	0.55	65	0.00	36	0.05	28	0.22	40	0.18	20	0.20
Francois 1956		17	0.62	13	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.36	40	0.11	21	0.20
Friedman 1923		85	0.23	57	0.00	61	0.04	55	0.04	30	0.25	35	0.10
Friedman 1923b		84	0.24	68	0.00	60	0.03	62	0.03	30	0.23	40	0.08
Friedman 1930		66	0.43	40	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.22	26	0.32	12	0.27
Garcia 2007		82	0.29	71	0.00	74	0.03	73	0.03	65	0.04	81	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.09	38	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	56	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		11	0.67	8	0.02	17	0.08	21	0.33	44	0.09	25	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		8	0.71	48	0.00	8	0.16	7	0.58	15	0.36	6	0.46
Groot 1988		12	0.67	32	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.48	34	0.17	11	0.29
Harasiewicz 1955		64	0.45	17	0.00	12	0.11	16	0.38	35	0.16	15	0.25
Hatto 1993		76	0.32	39	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	63	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1997		73	0.36	73	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.02	90	0.02
Horowitz 1949		36	0.56	42	0.00	30	0.05	34	0.18	37	0.13	26	0.15
Indjic 1988		75	0.33	84	0.00	82	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.02	88	0.02
Kapell 1951		37	0.56	80	0.00	64	0.04	53	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.04
Kissin 1993		28	0.58	22	0.00	37	0.05	27	0.23	57	0.04	33	0.10
Kushner 1989		9	0.68	26	0.00	13	0.12	13	0.40	41	0.16	14	0.25
Luisada 1991		69	0.40	89	0.00	78	0.02	82	0.02	75	0.03	87	0.02
Lushtak 2004		57	0.50	41	0.00	34	0.05	38	0.14	71	0.03	46	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		6	0.75	44	0.00	7	0.14	8	0.53	18	0.36	7	0.44
Magaloff 1978		5	0.77	6	0.04	5	0.20	5	0.66	13	0.41	5	0.52
Magin 1975		40	0.55	19	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.15	50	0.05	36	0.09
Michalowski 1933		81	0.29	62	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.12	69	0.04	42	0.07
Milkina 1970		18	0.61	66	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	58	0.05	50	0.05
Mohovich 1999		25	0.59	36	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.21	64	0.03	39	0.08
Moravec 1969		49	0.52	23	0.00	67	0.03	68	0.03	49	0.04	69	0.03
Morozova 2008		60	0.49	33	0.00	25	0.06	25	0.28	54	0.04	32	0.11
Neighaus 1950		16	0.63	10	0.01	20	0.08	19	0.35	46	0.06	28	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.46	52	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	48	0.05	58	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.57	9	0.01	53	0.04	54	0.04	68	0.03	76	0.03
Osinska 1989		29	0.58	30	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	49	0.05	47	0.05
Pachmann 1927		78	0.32	72	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	45	0.06	61	0.04
Paderewski 1930		20	0.60	5	0.05	23	0.07	33	0.19	28	0.18	23	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.53	34	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.34	41	0.10	22	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		52	0.51	49	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	56	0.04	48	0.05
Poblocka 1999		26	0.59	54	0.00	63	0.03	65	0.03	51	0.04	71	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.42	50	0.00	77	0.03	69	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.51	28	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.21	35	0.14	24	0.17
Rangell 2001		32	0.57	43	0.00	32	0.04	41	0.11	54	0.05	43	0.07
Richter 1976		47	0.53	81	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	65	0.03	52	0.05
Rosen 1989		33	0.57	27	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.04	53	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		1	0.86	1	0.43	1	0.42	4	0.72	1	0.74	4	0.73
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.80	2	0.14	2	0.43	2	0.79	3	0.78	2	0.78
Rosenthal 1931b		3	0.79	3	0.11	3	0.44	1	0.80	3	0.78	1	0.79
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		4	0.79	7	0.03	4	0.32	3	0.78	3	0.76	3	0.77
Rossi 2007		86	0.21	63	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	54	0.03	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		80	0.30	67	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	40	0.13	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.47	82	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	50	0.07	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		48	0.52	69	0.00	65	0.03	61	0.03	55	0.05	64	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.65	12	0.01	15	0.07	12	0.43	34	0.21	10	0.30
Shebanova 2002		65	0.45	51	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03
Smith 1975		15	0.65	4	0.06	6	0.16	6	0.58	37	0.18	9	0.32
Sokolov 2002		10	0.68	45	0.00	16	0.07	14	0.40	41	0.17	13	0.26
Sztompka 1959		44	0.53	25	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	45	0.07	45	0.06
Tomsic 1995		38	0.56	85	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.11	76	0.03	44	0.06
Uninsky 1932		77	0.32	77	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03
Uninsky 1971		61	0.48	78	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.05	62	0.04
Wasowski 1980		68	0.40	64	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	46	0.06	57	0.04
Zak 1937		56	0.50	90	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.04
Zak 1951		50	0.52	86	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.05	51	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.01	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	25	0.23	54	0.05
Random 2		89	0.00	70	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	30	0.18	65	0.04
Random 3		88	0.09	16	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.14	55	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).