Uninsky 1971

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.68	26	0.01	20	0.08	20	0.41	24	0.27	22	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		41	0.54	24	0.01	25	0.07	29	0.32	22	0.31	26	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.62	75	0.00	29	0.09	24	0.39	28	0.27	24	0.32
Bacha 2000		71	0.40	76	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	75	0.03	84	0.02
Badura 1965		31	0.60	16	0.01	28	0.07	27	0.36	12	0.42	18	0.39
Barbosa 1983		20	0.65	38	0.00	15	0.07	19	0.42	13	0.43	12	0.42
Biret 1990		25	0.62	31	0.00	35	0.06	30	0.29	38	0.15	34	0.21
Blet 2003		5	0.72	53	0.00	13	0.11	16	0.43	17	0.38	17	0.40
Block 1995		65	0.43	28	0.00	65	0.04	64	0.04	66	0.04	62	0.04
Blumental 1952		40	0.54	44	0.00	36	0.07	42	0.18	17	0.27	32	0.22
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.54	68	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		69	0.42	25	0.01	83	0.02	83	0.02	69	0.04	70	0.03
Bunin 1987		3	0.77	3	0.05	3	0.25	3	0.58	4	0.55	3	0.56
Bunin 1987b		2	0.77	8	0.02	2	0.18	2	0.58	4	0.55	2	0.56
Chiu 1999		68	0.42	69	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	67	0.04	54	0.04
Cohen 1997		85	0.18	45	0.00	78	0.02	80	0.02	68	0.03	88	0.02
Cortot 1951		16	0.66	9	0.02	17	0.11	14	0.44	11	0.45	10	0.44
Csalog 1996		75	0.37	21	0.01	54	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.06	52	0.05
Czerny 1949		9	0.69	42	0.00	21	0.09	15	0.43	16	0.40	15	0.41
Czerny 1990		6	0.72	54	0.00	19	0.10	10	0.46	25	0.25	21	0.34
Duchoud 2007		7	0.71	11	0.01	8	0.09	13	0.44	11	0.45	9	0.44
Ezaki 2006		10	0.69	23	0.01	22	0.07	17	0.42	49	0.06	38	0.16
Falvay 1989		53	0.49	55	0.00	69	0.05	53	0.05	83	0.03	56	0.04
Farrell 1958		47	0.52	59	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		23	0.63	12	0.01	10	0.07	26	0.36	9	0.48	13	0.42
Fliere 1977		33	0.59	70	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	82	0.03	53	0.04
Fou 1978		82	0.32	80	0.00	85	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Francois 1956		36	0.57	20	0.01	41	0.07	39	0.19	35	0.13	40	0.16
Friedman 1923		81	0.32	88	0.00	42	0.08	38	0.19	5	0.53	25	0.32
Friedman 1923b		76	0.34	90	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.21	4	0.53	23	0.33
Friedman 1930		79	0.34	51	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.17	32	0.23	35	0.20
Garcia 2007		61	0.45	71	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	16	0.35	42	0.13
Garcia 2007b		86	0.13	87	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		30	0.60	46	0.00	38	0.06	31	0.28	43	0.11	37	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.56	34	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	67	0.03	65	0.04
Groot 1988		32	0.60	39	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.15	56	0.04	48	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		39	0.55	2	0.06	5	0.18	4	0.53	19	0.33	14	0.42
Hatto 1993		74	0.38	49	0.00	34	0.08	41	0.18	20	0.32	31	0.24
Hatto 1997		59	0.46	47	0.00	26	0.08	34	0.23	19	0.36	28	0.29
Horowitz 1949		62	0.44	72	0.00	66	0.03	69	0.03	65	0.04	75	0.03
Indjic 1988		72	0.40	77	0.00	33	0.08	40	0.18	23	0.32	30	0.24
Kapell 1951		12	0.68	6	0.03	6	0.10	9	0.46	12	0.47	6	0.46
Kissin 1993		63	0.43	61	0.00	81	0.02	81	0.02	67	0.04	76	0.03
Kushner 1989		34	0.58	56	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	70	0.03	73	0.03
Luisada 1991		70	0.41	62	0.00	74	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.03
Lushtak 2004		22	0.63	52	0.00	12	0.08	18	0.42	18	0.36	19	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.66	13	0.01	24	0.09	23	0.40	36	0.14	29	0.24
Magaloff 1978		50	0.50	78	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	52	0.04	55	0.04
Magin 1975		60	0.45	81	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	51	0.05	51	0.05
Michalowski 1933		44	0.53	50	0.00	9	0.07	6	0.48	9	0.45	7	0.46
Milkina 1970		58	0.46	40	0.00	82	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03
Mohovich 1999		15	0.67	43	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.35	55	0.04	44	0.12
Moravec 1969		52	0.50	82	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	74	0.03	67	0.03
Morozova 2008		51	0.50	64	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	72	0.03	78	0.03
Neighaus 1950		28	0.60	30	0.00	30	0.11	25	0.37	53	0.05	41	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.42	65	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.03	72	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.60	14	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.27	42	0.13	36	0.19
Osinska 1989		37	0.56	7	0.02	48	0.05	56	0.05	43	0.09	49	0.07
Pachmann 1927		73	0.38	48	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	48	0.05	60	0.04
Paderewski 1930		26	0.61	41	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.21	26	0.22	33	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.68	27	0.00	14	0.08	8	0.47	19	0.34	16	0.40
Pierdomenico 2008		67	0.42	57	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.03	85	0.02
Poblocka 1999		21	0.65	4	0.04	16	0.07	22	0.40	23	0.32	20	0.36
Rabcewiczowa 1932		18	0.66	33	0.00	23	0.07	21	0.41	11	0.46	11	0.43
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.54	79	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.27	43	0.09	39	0.16
Rangell 2001		56	0.46	18	0.01	75	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.04	80	0.03
Richter 1976		45	0.53	60	0.00	47	0.05	57	0.05	40	0.08	50	0.06
Rosen 1989		46	0.52	22	0.01	57	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.03	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		35	0.58	19	0.01	45	0.08	45	0.08	34	0.21	43	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.34	89	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	69	0.03	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.31	37	0.00	72	0.03	68	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.48	83	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	56	0.04	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.34	66	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Rossi 2007		84	0.29	84	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.09	35	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.34	29	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		64	0.43	85	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	80	0.03	87	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		17	0.66	32	0.00	11	0.08	11	0.45	7	0.47	8	0.46
Shebanova 2002		57	0.46	17	0.01	53	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.03	61	0.04
Smith 1975		14	0.67	15	0.01	18	0.09	12	0.45	34	0.19	27	0.29
Sokolov 2002		4	0.76	5	0.03	4	0.24	5	0.53	2	0.53	4	0.53
Sztompka 1959		8	0.71	10	0.01	7	0.11	7	0.47	8	0.50	5	0.48
Tomsic 1995		27	0.61	73	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.21	46	0.05	45	0.10
Uninsky 1932		1	0.87	1	0.50	1	0.49	1	0.72	1	0.74	1	0.73
Uninsky 1971		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Wasowski 1980		55	0.46	74	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	81	0.03	69	0.03
Zak 1937		49	0.51	58	0.00	63	0.05	49	0.05	79	0.03	58	0.04
Zak 1951		48	0.51	86	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	69	0.04	59	0.04
Random 1		88	0.02	36	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	20	0.31	47	0.08
Random 2		90	0.00	63	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	20	0.29	46	0.08
Random 3		89	0.02	67	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	46	0.06	79	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).