Sokolov 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		24	0.70	63	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.29	28	0.23	33	0.26
Anderszewski 2003		18	0.72	27	0.01	16	0.10	11	0.44	11	0.50	8	0.47
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.71	21	0.01	15	0.10	19	0.39	23	0.32	27	0.35
Bacha 2000		77	0.42	70	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.03	86	0.02
Badura 1965		48	0.58	9	0.03	22	0.08	28	0.33	14	0.41	23	0.37
Barbosa 1983		64	0.52	86	0.00	55	0.06	48	0.06	37	0.23	46	0.12
Biret 1990		16	0.72	35	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.25	28	0.22	39	0.23
Blet 2003		20	0.71	89	0.00	31	0.10	25	0.35	22	0.32	28	0.33
Block 1995		69	0.50	64	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.10	58	0.07
Blumental 1952		79	0.38	87	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	48	0.05	69	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.54	54	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	54	0.04	81	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.52	61	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	57	0.04	74	0.03
Bunin 1987		6	0.77	5	0.06	6	0.16	12	0.44	5	0.51	9	0.47
Bunin 1987b		7	0.77	7	0.03	7	0.18	13	0.44	5	0.51	7	0.47
Chiu 1999		78	0.39	72	0.00	72	0.03	67	0.03	61	0.04	75	0.03
Cohen 1997		83	0.26	32	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		17	0.72	53	0.00	32	0.07	24	0.36	7	0.50	16	0.42
Csalog 1996		75	0.42	33	0.00	64	0.03	66	0.03	49	0.06	68	0.04
Czerny 1949		23	0.71	2	0.14	2	0.14	8	0.46	7	0.53	6	0.49
Czerny 1990		2	0.80	6	0.04	4	0.14	3	0.51	5	0.51	3	0.51
Duchoud 2007		1	0.82	3	0.10	3	0.12	4	0.51	5	0.50	4	0.50
Ezaki 2006		3	0.79	26	0.01	9	0.12	6	0.46	17	0.35	18	0.40
Falvay 1989		44	0.61	49	0.00	57	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.05	59	0.05
Farrell 1958		47	0.59	67	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	31	0.15	57	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		40	0.65	56	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	22	0.37	42	0.14
Fliere 1977		11	0.75	37	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.24	45	0.06	45	0.12
Fou 1978		71	0.47	60	0.00	78	0.03	74	0.03	63	0.05	63	0.04
Francois 1956		35	0.66	62	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.26	22	0.27	36	0.26
Friedman 1923		85	0.24	79	0.00	66	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.29	50	0.11
Friedman 1923b		84	0.25	69	0.00	65	0.04	63	0.04	27	0.28	49	0.11
Friedman 1930		76	0.42	43	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	28	0.30	47	0.12
Garcia 2007		72	0.47	81	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	12	0.40	44	0.13
Garcia 2007b		87	0.21	88	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	59	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		32	0.67	16	0.02	42	0.06	42	0.15	42	0.12	43	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.69	28	0.01	43	0.06	43	0.12	31	0.19	40	0.15
Groot 1988		38	0.66	73	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	46	0.05	71	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		49	0.58	8	0.03	10	0.09	5	0.49	8	0.44	12	0.46
Hatto 1993		68	0.50	77	0.00	38	0.09	38	0.21	19	0.32	34	0.26
Hatto 1997		51	0.57	17	0.02	24	0.08	30	0.28	20	0.36	30	0.32
Horowitz 1949		63	0.52	84	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	54	0.05	66	0.04
Indjic 1988		60	0.53	40	0.00	26	0.06	35	0.25	11	0.41	29	0.32
Kapell 1951		5	0.77	19	0.01	17	0.11	10	0.46	13	0.47	11	0.46
Kissin 1993		50	0.57	45	0.00	61	0.03	72	0.03	49	0.06	67	0.04
Kushner 1989		8	0.76	29	0.01	27	0.06	26	0.35	11	0.39	22	0.37
Luisada 1991		53	0.56	13	0.02	69	0.03	69	0.03	58	0.04	73	0.03
Lushtak 2004		27	0.69	20	0.01	8	0.15	17	0.41	15	0.41	17	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.77	18	0.02	21	0.09	14	0.44	24	0.28	26	0.35
Magaloff 1978		28	0.68	22	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	47	0.05	56	0.07
Magin 1975		39	0.65	34	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.18	11	0.32	37	0.24
Michalowski 1933		59	0.53	15	0.02	20	0.10	20	0.38	1	0.54	13	0.45
Milkina 1970		46	0.59	24	0.01	68	0.04	65	0.04	52	0.05	65	0.04
Mohovich 1999		37	0.66	59	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.04	70	0.04
Moravec 1969		58	0.54	65	0.00	48	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.12	54	0.07
Morozova 2008		29	0.68	23	0.01	23	0.08	23	0.36	6	0.37	24	0.36
Neighaus 1950		33	0.67	41	0.00	39	0.09	39	0.20	50	0.05	52	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.51	75	0.00	62	0.04	55	0.04	22	0.25	51	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.75	11	0.02	14	0.09	16	0.42	15	0.39	20	0.40
Osinska 1989		43	0.62	25	0.01	47	0.04	53	0.04	41	0.13	55	0.07
Pachmann 1927		82	0.34	82	0.00	82	0.03	73	0.03	62	0.04	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		55	0.55	48	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	65	0.03	76	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.66	14	0.02	19	0.11	18	0.40	5	0.46	15	0.43
Pierdomenico 2008		45	0.60	44	0.00	58	0.07	46	0.07	50	0.04	60	0.05
Poblocka 1999		19	0.72	83	0.00	37	0.07	31	0.27	28	0.25	32	0.26
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.67	55	0.00	34	0.07	37	0.22	13	0.41	31	0.30
Rachmaninoff 1923		30	0.68	31	0.00	18	0.12	15	0.43	4	0.49	10	0.46
Rangell 2001		65	0.51	68	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	76	0.03	88	0.02
Richter 1976		21	0.71	12	0.02	13	0.10	9	0.46	1	0.53	5	0.49
Rosen 1989		54	0.56	66	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	63	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		13	0.74	50	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.37	6	0.54	14	0.45
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.51	85	0.00	67	0.03	71	0.03	45	0.07	62	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.46	71	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	46	0.05	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		31	0.68	57	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.17	14	0.40	35	0.26
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.46	78	0.00	79	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.04	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		81	0.37	76	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	9	0.30	48	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.23	42	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.37	38	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		70	0.47	46	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.74	4	0.07	5	0.16	1	0.53	5	0.50	2	0.51
Shebanova 2002		61	0.53	58	0.00	70	0.03	68	0.03	66	0.04	79	0.03
Smith 1975		12	0.74	10	0.03	12	0.11	7	0.46	17	0.27	25	0.35
Sokolov 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		15	0.73	51	0.00	28	0.07	22	0.37	13	0.44	19	0.40
Tomsic 1995		26	0.69	39	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.27	31	0.21	38	0.24
Uninsky 1932		41	0.64	52	0.00	11	0.09	27	0.34	16	0.43	21	0.38
Uninsky 1971		9	0.76	1	0.14	1	0.14	2	0.53	5	0.53	1	0.53
Wasowski 1980		42	0.63	30	0.00	46	0.07	45	0.07	17	0.28	41	0.14
Zak 1937		56	0.55	36	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04
Zak 1951		52	0.56	47	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.05	61	0.05
Random 1		89	0.00	80	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	17	0.35	53	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.11	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.06	90	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	47	0.06	82	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).